UFC Fight Night: Bonfim vs. Brady · Light Heavyweight · 3 rounds
Opening locked Oct 3, 2026 · Billy Elekana 51% · Decision · Distance · waiting on the result

USABilly Elekana
“Son of Susie”
Unranked · 10-2 · striker · Southpaw · 31 · IQ C+ 65
Uprising MMA · USA
Billy Elekana
50.6%
Lucas Fernando
49.4%
Model win probability · confidence 43%
No market posted yet.
Why the model leans this way
Billy Elekana is the model side at 50.6% because the largest live edges sit where this fight is likely to be fought. Grappler historical edge: Fernando (ground 58) into Elekana (TD reaction 54). Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly. Ground game is the clearest separator: Fernando 58 (C) vs Elekana 38 (D). Fernando brings 3.0 TD/15 and 2 sub wins into Elekana's 82% takedown defense.
Ground game
FernandoFernando 58 (C) vs Elekana 38 (D). Fernando brings 3.0 TD/15 and 2 sub wins into Elekana's 82% takedown defense.
Takedown reaction
FernandoFernando 65 (C+) vs Elekana 54 (C). When the shot comes, Fernando stuffs it at 73% — Elekana is at 82%.
Punching agility
ElekanaElekana 50 (C) vs Fernando 43 (D). Hand speed / output lean Elekana (2.7 SLpM at 59%).
Counter punching
ElekanaElekana 48 (D) vs Fernando 43 (D). Elekana's return is the live one (0.10 KD/15, 0 KOs) against Fernando's entries.
Path · Elekana
Elekana has to stuff the first takedown (54 TD-reaction), keep this standing, and hunt a pocket that grades 61 on defense. Wrestling is the death lane.
Path · Fernando
Fernando has to wrestle early, chain the second shot, and make Elekana defend the neck instead of throwing. It is the only reliable flip if the pocket goes cold.
A one-score fight on the model. Any three-minute pocket explosion or a stuck takedown against the grain wipes a lot of this number.
Style and location. Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish. Elekana is built as: Pocket striker — suspect hips against the shot, southpaw. Fernando is built as: Hybrid who can change levels. Fight IQ delta is -3 toward Fernando — that is composure, win-lane diversity, and whether they solve a second problem when the first look dies.
The edges that move the number. Ground game: Fernando 58 (C) vs Elekana 38 (D). Fernando brings 3.0 TD/15 and 2 sub wins into Elekana's 82% takedown defense. Takedown reaction: Fernando 65 (C+) vs Elekana 54 (C). When the shot comes, Fernando stuffs it at 73% — Elekana is at 82%. Punching agility: Elekana 50 (C) vs Fernando 43 (D). Hand speed / output lean Elekana (2.7 SLpM at 59%).
The finish path leans the mat (28% submission). Once a takedown sticks, the neck becomes the whole fight. A one-score fight on the model. Any three-minute pocket explosion or a stuck takedown against the grain wipes a lot of this number. These trait marks are derived from FightMetric rates, career method shares, and loaded bout rows — reaction time and agility are proxies, not stopwatch numbers. The model folds the same scores into win probability, so a hole on this card is a hole in the percentage.
Fight IQ, ground game, defense, counter punching, reaction, agility, and takedown reaction — scored from tape and folded into the win number above.
Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish.
R1
22%
R2
15%
R3
18%
Dist
45%
Most likely: Distance. Expected 10.6 minutes.
Grappler historical edge: Fernando (ground 58) into Elekana (TD reaction 54). Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly.
Striking differential
-0.94 vs -2.08 SLpM−SApM (recency / opp. adjusted)
Ground game (tape)
38 vs 58
Damage ratio
0.74 vs 0.47 landed/absorbed
Takedown reaction
82% vs 73% hips on the shot
Grappling composite
TD avg × acc × def + control + submission threat (adj.)
Output (SLpM)
2.71 vs 1.87
Reach / length
77.5" vs 80.5"
Striking efficiency
59% vs 55%
Style interaction
Grappler historical edge: Fernando (ground 58) into Elekana (TD reaction 54). Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly.
Punching agility
Output × accuracy × age curve
Fight IQ
C+ 65 vs C+ 67 — composure, win-lane diversity, adjustments
Counter punching
48 vs 43
Striking defense
63% vs 64%
Timing & reaction
Defense + absorb + knockdown timing proxy
Age-adjusted curve
31 vs 29
Takedown mismatch
TD def 82% vs 73%
Pocket defense (tape)
C+ vs C+
Durability
0 vs 0 KO losses
Cardio proxy
Output sustainability + distance rate
Recency form
Opp.-adjusted last 0/0 UFC rows
Strength of schedule
Opp. quality 50 vs 50
Layoff / rust
Time since last fight
Championship / 5-round
Three-round fight
No recent UFC tape in the book.
No recent UFC tape in the book.
Sign in to request a written analyst note on this fight.