UFC Fight Night: Procházka vs. Stirling · Flyweight · 3 rounds
Opening locked Oct 1, 2026 · Alessandro Costa 65% · Decision · Distance · waiting on the result
Amir Albazi
34.9%
Alessandro Costa
65.1%
Model win probability · confidence 59%
No market posted yet.
Why the model leans this way
Alessandro Costa is the model side at 65.1% because the largest live edges sit where this fight is likely to be fought. hybrid meets striker. Punching agility is the clearest separator: Costa 57 (C) vs Albazi 34 (D). Hand speed / output lean Costa (3.9 SLpM at 51%).
Punching agility
CostaCosta 57 (C) vs Albazi 34 (D). Hand speed / output lean Costa (3.9 SLpM at 51%).
Counter punching
CostaCosta 49 (D) vs Albazi 32 (D). Costa's return is the live one (0.51 KD/15, 0 KOs) against Albazi's entries.
Ground game
AlbaziAlbazi 40 (D) vs Costa 34 (D). Albazi brings 1.2 TD/15 and 9 sub wins into Costa's 82% takedown defense.
Timing & reaction
CostaCosta 68 (B) vs Albazi 64 (C+). The reaction proxy — defense plus absorb plus knockdown timing — sits with Costa.
Path · Albazi
Albazi wins by forcing the fight into durability and denying Costa a long look at durability.
Path · Costa
Volume. Costa wins ugly minutes at range, clutter the center, and never give Albazi a clean reset.
A one-score fight on the model. Any three-minute pocket explosion or a stuck takedown against the grain wipes a lot of this number.
Style and location. The fight should spend most of its minutes at range. Costa is built as: Pocket striker. Albazi is built as: Hybrid who can change levels. Fight IQ delta is +2 toward Costa — that is composure, win-lane diversity, and whether they solve a second problem when the first look dies.
The edges that move the number. Punching agility: Costa 57 (C) vs Albazi 34 (D). Hand speed / output lean Costa (3.9 SLpM at 51%). Counter punching: Costa 49 (D) vs Albazi 32 (D). Costa's return is the live one (0.51 KD/15, 0 KOs) against Albazi's entries. Ground game: Albazi 40 (D) vs Costa 34 (D). Albazi brings 1.2 TD/15 and 9 sub wins into Costa's 82% takedown defense.
The finish path leans strikes (33% KO/TKO vs 29% submission). One clean read in the pocket can flip a close card. A one-score fight on the model. Any three-minute pocket explosion or a stuck takedown against the grain wipes a lot of this number. These trait marks are derived from FightMetric rates, career method shares, and loaded bout rows — reaction time and agility are proxies, not stopwatch numbers. The model folds the same scores into win probability, so a hole on this card is a hole in the percentage.
Fight IQ, ground game, defense, counter punching, reaction, agility, and takedown reaction — scored from tape and folded into the win number above.
The fight should spend most of its minutes at range.
R1
27%
R2
17%
R3
18%
Dist
38%
Most likely: Distance. Expected 9.9 minutes.
hybrid meets striker.
Striking differential
-1.27 vs 0.61 SLpM−SApM (recency / opp. adjusted)
Damage ratio
0.66 vs 1.19 landed/absorbed
Punching agility
Output × accuracy × age curve
Counter punching
32 vs 49
Output (SLpM)
2.47 vs 3.86
Striking efficiency
41% vs 51%
Ground game (tape)
40 vs 34
Striking defense
63% vs 60%
Timing & reaction
Defense + absorb + knockdown timing proxy
Fight IQ
C+ 64 vs C+ 66 — composure, win-lane diversity, adjustments
Pocket defense (tape)
C+ vs C+
Recency form
Opp.-adjusted last 0/0 UFC rows
Durability
0 vs 0 KO losses
Reach / length
68.0" vs 67.0"
Grappling composite
TD avg × acc × def + control + submission threat (adj.)
Cardio proxy
Output sustainability + distance rate
Takedown reaction
80% vs 82% hips on the shot
Age-adjusted curve
32 vs 30
Takedown mismatch
TD def 80% vs 82%
Strength of schedule
Opp. quality 50 vs 50
Style interaction
hybrid meets striker.
Layoff / rust
Time since last fight
Championship / 5-round
Three-round fight
No recent UFC tape in the book.
No recent UFC tape in the book.
Sign in to request a written analyst note on this fight.