UFC Fight Night: Allen vs. Duncan · Lightweight · 3 rounds
Opening locked Oct 2, 2026 · Matheus Camilo 52% · Decision · Distance · scored miss (Jai Herbert / Decision - Unanimous)

BrazilMatheus Camilo
“Jaguar”
Unranked · 11-3 · wrestler · Orthodox · 25 · IQ C 54
Xtreme Couture · Brazil
Matheus Camilo
51.7%
Jai Herbert
48.3%
Model win probability · confidence 44%
Desk
51.7% / 48.3%
Market
63.2% / 36.8%
Moneyline
-186 / +164
Edge
−11.5% Herbert
Pinnacle moneyline, two-way de-vigged. Desk is well off the market on Herbert. Not a betting tip.
Why the model leans this way
Matheus Camilo is the model side at 51.7% because the largest live edges sit where this fight is likely to be fought. Grappler historical edge: Camilo (ground 72) into Herbert (TD reaction 63). Ground game is the clearest separator: Camilo 72 (B) vs Herbert 18 (D). Camilo brings 4.4 TD/15 and 2 sub wins into Herbert's 83% takedown defense.
Ground game
CamiloCamilo 72 (B) vs Herbert 18 (D). Camilo brings 4.4 TD/15 and 2 sub wins into Herbert's 83% takedown defense.
Takedown reaction
HerbertHerbert 63 (C+) vs Camilo 49 (D). When the shot comes, Herbert stuffs it at 83% — Camilo is at 67%.
Striking defense
HerbertHerbert 63 (C+) vs Camilo 62 (C+). Herbert absorbs 3.48/min at 62% defense; Camilo is a softer target at 3.83 SApM.
Counter punching
HerbertHerbert 45 (D) vs Camilo 43 (D). Herbert's return is the live one (0.27 KD/15, 0 KOs) against Camilo's entries.
Path · Camilo
Camilo has to wrestle early, chain the second shot, and make Herbert defend the neck instead of throwing. That is the percentage path.
Path · Herbert
Herbert has to stuff the first takedown (63 TD-reaction), keep this standing, and hunt a pocket that grades 62 on defense. Wrestling is the death lane.
A one-score fight on the model. Any three-minute pocket explosion or a stuck takedown against the grain wipes a lot of this number.
Style and location. Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish. Camilo is built as: Hybrid who can change levels — suspect hips against the shot. Herbert is built as: Pocket striker. Fight IQ delta is -2 toward Herbert — that is composure, win-lane diversity, and whether they solve a second problem when the first look dies.
The edges that move the number. Ground game: Camilo 72 (B) vs Herbert 18 (D). Camilo brings 4.4 TD/15 and 2 sub wins into Herbert's 83% takedown defense. Takedown reaction: Herbert 63 (C+) vs Camilo 49 (D). When the shot comes, Herbert stuffs it at 83% — Camilo is at 67%. Striking defense: Herbert 63 (C+) vs Camilo 62 (C+). Herbert absorbs 3.48/min at 62% defense; Camilo is a softer target at 3.83 SApM.
The clock is live — decision is the modal ending (48%). Minutes and control matter more than a single shot. A one-score fight on the model. Any three-minute pocket explosion or a stuck takedown against the grain wipes a lot of this number. These trait marks are derived from FightMetric rates, career method shares, and loaded bout rows — reaction time and agility are proxies, not stopwatch numbers. The model folds the same scores into win probability, so a hole on this card is a hole in the percentage.
Fight IQ, ground game, defense, counter punching, reaction, agility, and takedown reaction — scored from tape and folded into the win number above.
Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish.
R1
22%
R2
14%
R3
16%
Dist
48%
Most likely: Distance. Expected 10.8 minutes.
Grappler historical edge: Camilo (ground 72) into Herbert (TD reaction 63).
Ground game (tape)
72 vs 18
Striking differential
-1.64 vs -0.29 SLpM−SApM (recency / opp. adjusted)
Grappling composite
TD avg × acc × def + control + submission threat (adj.)
Reach / length
69.0" vs 77.0"
Damage ratio
0.57 vs 0.92 landed/absorbed
Takedown reaction
67% vs 83% hips on the shot
Output (SLpM)
2.19 vs 3.19
Age-adjusted curve
25 vs 38
Style interaction
Grappler historical edge: Camilo (ground 72) into Herbert (TD reaction 63).
Striking defense
64% vs 62%
Striking efficiency
53% vs 51%
Fight IQ
C 54 vs C 55 — composure, win-lane diversity, adjustments
Recency form
Opp.-adjusted last 0/0 UFC rows
Takedown mismatch
TD def 67% vs 83%
Pocket defense (tape)
C+ vs C+
Counter punching
43 vs 45
Timing & reaction
Defense + absorb + knockdown timing proxy
Punching agility
Output × accuracy × age curve
Cardio proxy
Output sustainability + distance rate
Strength of schedule
Opp. quality 50 vs 50
Layoff / rust
Time since last fight
Championship / 5-round
Three-round fight
Durability
0 vs 0 KO losses
No recent UFC tape in the book.
No recent UFC tape in the book.
Sign in to request a written analyst note on this fight.