UFC 335: Oliveira vs. Lopes · Middleweight · 3 rounds
Opening locked Sep 16, 2026 · Opponent TBA 50% · Decision · Distance · waiting on the result
Joe Pyfer
32.3%
Bo Nickal
67.7%
Model win probability · confidence 62%
No market posted yet.
Why the model leans this way
Bo Nickal is the model side at 67.7% because the largest live edges sit where this fight is likely to be fought. Grappler historical edge: Nickal (ground 80) into Pyfer (TD reaction 57). Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly. Ground game is the clearest separator: Nickal 80 (B+) vs Pyfer 46 (D). Nickal brings 3.1 TD/15 and 4 sub wins into Pyfer's 79% takedown defense.
Ground game
NickalNickal 80 (B+) vs Pyfer 46 (D). Nickal brings 3.1 TD/15 and 4 sub wins into Pyfer's 79% takedown defense.
Counter punching
NickalNickal 69 (B) vs Pyfer 49 (D). Nickal's return is the live one (0.84 KD/15, 0 KOs) against Pyfer's entries.
Punching agility
NickalNickal 70 (B) vs Pyfer 54 (C). Hand speed / output lean Nickal (3.4 SLpM at 68%).
Fight IQ
NickalNickal 80 (B+) vs Pyfer 63 (C+). Problem-solving and win-lane diversity sit with Nickal (B+ vs C+).
Path · Pyfer
Pyfer has to stuff the first takedown (57 TD-reaction), keep this standing, and hunt a pocket that grades 64 on defense. Wrestling is the death lane.
Path · Nickal
Nickal has to wrestle early, chain the second shot, and make Pyfer defend the neck instead of throwing. That is the percentage path.
A one-score fight on the model. Any three-minute pocket explosion or a stuck takedown against the grain wipes a lot of this number.
Style and location. Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish. Nickal is built as: Hybrid who can change levels — southpaw. Pyfer is built as: Hybrid who can change levels. Fight IQ delta is +16 toward Nickal — that is composure, win-lane diversity, and whether they solve a second problem when the first look dies.
The edges that move the number. Ground game: Nickal 80 (B+) vs Pyfer 46 (D). Nickal brings 3.1 TD/15 and 4 sub wins into Pyfer's 79% takedown defense. Counter punching: Nickal 69 (B) vs Pyfer 49 (D). Nickal's return is the live one (0.84 KD/15, 0 KOs) against Pyfer's entries. Punching agility: Nickal 70 (B) vs Pyfer 54 (C). Hand speed / output lean Nickal (3.4 SLpM at 68%).
The finish path leans strikes (47% KO/TKO vs 42% submission). One clean read in the pocket can flip a close card. A one-score fight on the model. Any three-minute pocket explosion or a stuck takedown against the grain wipes a lot of this number. These trait marks are derived from FightMetric rates, career method shares, and loaded bout rows — reaction time and agility are proxies, not stopwatch numbers. The model folds the same scores into win probability, so a hole on this card is a hole in the percentage.
Fight IQ, ground game, defense, counter punching, reaction, agility, and takedown reaction — scored from tape and folded into the win number above.
Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish.
R1
45%
R2
23%
R3
20%
Dist
12%
Most likely: Round 1. Expected 7 minutes.
Grappler historical edge: Nickal (ground 80) into Pyfer (TD reaction 57). Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly.
Ground game (tape)
46 vs 80
Striking efficiency
46% vs 68%
Fight IQ
C+ 63 vs B+ 80 — composure, win-lane diversity, adjustments
Grappling composite
TD avg × acc × def + control + submission threat (adj.)
Counter punching
49 vs 69
Punching agility
Output × accuracy × age curve
Takedown reaction
79% vs 73% hips on the shot
Striking differential
0.15 vs -0.06 SLpM−SApM (recency / opp. adjusted)
Style interaction
Grappler historical edge: Nickal (ground 80) into Pyfer (TD reaction 57). Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly.
Durability
0 vs 0 KO losses
Damage ratio
1.04 vs 0.98 landed/absorbed
Reach / length
75.0" vs 76.0"
Recency form
Opp.-adjusted last 0/0 UFC rows
Output (SLpM)
3.52 vs 3.36
Timing & reaction
Defense + absorb + knockdown timing proxy
Takedown mismatch
TD def 79% vs 73%
Striking defense
61% vs 61%
Pocket defense (tape)
C+ vs C+
Cardio proxy
Output sustainability + distance rate
Age-adjusted curve
30 vs 30
Strength of schedule
Opp. quality 50 vs 50
Layoff / rust
Time since last fight
Championship / 5-round
Three-round fight
No recent UFC tape in the book.
No recent UFC tape in the book.
Sign in to request a written analyst note on this fight.