UFC 334: Gane vs. Hokit · Welterweight · 3 rounds
Opening locked Sep 9, 2026 · Opponent TBA 50% · Decision · Distance · waiting on the result

USAStephen Thompson
“Wonderboy”
#6 · 17-9-1 · striker · Orthodox · 43 · IQ C 58
Team Upstate Karate · USA
Stephen Thompson
50.9%
Charles Radtke
49.1%
Model win probability · confidence 43%
No market posted yet.
Why the model leans this way
Stephen Thompson is the model side at 50.9% because the largest live edges sit where this fight is likely to be fought. Grappler historical edge: Radtke (ground 48) into Thompson (TD reaction 65). Ground game is the clearest separator: Radtke 48 (D) vs Thompson 20 (D). Radtke brings 2.0 TD/15 and 3 sub wins into Thompson's 84% takedown defense.
Ground game
RadtkeRadtke 48 (D) vs Thompson 20 (D). Radtke brings 2.0 TD/15 and 3 sub wins into Thompson's 84% takedown defense.
Fight IQ
RadtkeRadtke 71 (B) vs Thompson 58 (C). Problem-solving and win-lane diversity sit with Radtke (B vs C).
Durability
RadtkeRadtke 85 (A) vs Thompson 77 (B+). Radtke has been finished by strikes 0 times; Thompson 0.
Timing & reaction
ThompsonThompson 65 (C+) vs Radtke 58 (C). The reaction proxy — defense plus absorb plus knockdown timing — sits with Thompson.
Path · Thompson
Thompson has to stuff the first takedown (65 TD-reaction), keep this standing, and hunt a pocket that grades 62 on defense. Wrestling is the death lane.
Path · Radtke
Radtke has to wrestle early, chain the second shot, and make Thompson defend the neck instead of throwing. It is the only reliable flip if the pocket goes cold.
A one-score fight on the model. Any three-minute pocket explosion or a stuck takedown against the grain wipes a lot of this number.
Style and location. Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish. Thompson is built as: Power striker. Radtke is built as: Hybrid who can change levels. Fight IQ delta is -13 toward Radtke — that is composure, win-lane diversity, and whether they solve a second problem when the first look dies.
The edges that move the number. Ground game: Radtke 48 (D) vs Thompson 20 (D). Radtke brings 2.0 TD/15 and 3 sub wins into Thompson's 84% takedown defense. Fight IQ: Radtke 71 (B) vs Thompson 58 (C). Problem-solving and win-lane diversity sit with Radtke (B vs C). Durability: Radtke 85 (A) vs Thompson 77 (B+). Radtke has been finished by strikes 0 times; Thompson 0.
The finish path leans strikes (38% KO/TKO vs 19% submission). One clean read in the pocket can flip a close card. A one-score fight on the model. Any three-minute pocket explosion or a stuck takedown against the grain wipes a lot of this number. These trait marks are derived from FightMetric rates, career method shares, and loaded bout rows — reaction time and agility are proxies, not stopwatch numbers. The model folds the same scores into win probability, so a hole on this card is a hole in the percentage.
Fight IQ, ground game, defense, counter punching, reaction, agility, and takedown reaction — scored from tape and folded into the win number above.
Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish.
R1
30%
R2
15%
R3
13%
Dist
43%
Most likely: Distance. Expected 9.8 minutes.
Grappler historical edge: Radtke (ground 48) into Thompson (TD reaction 65).
Striking differential
0.87 vs -1.22 SLpM−SApM (recency / opp. adjusted)
Ground game (tape)
20 vs 48
Damage ratio
1.27 vs 0.67 landed/absorbed
Fight IQ
C 58 vs B 71 — composure, win-lane diversity, adjustments
Striking efficiency
50% vs 68%
Output (SLpM)
4.05 vs 2.50
Grappling composite
TD avg × acc × def + control + submission threat (adj.)
Reach / length
75.0" vs 72.0"
Striking defense
60% vs 63%
Durability
0 vs 0 KO losses
Age-adjusted curve
43 vs 36
Style interaction
Grappler historical edge: Radtke (ground 48) into Thompson (TD reaction 65).
Counter punching
62 vs 57
Timing & reaction
Defense + absorb + knockdown timing proxy
Pocket defense (tape)
C+ vs C+
Recency form
Opp.-adjusted last 0/0 UFC rows
Cardio proxy
Output sustainability + distance rate
Takedown mismatch
TD def 84% vs 77%
Punching agility
Output × accuracy × age curve
Takedown reaction
84% vs 77% hips on the shot
Strength of schedule
Opp. quality 50 vs 50
Layoff / rust
Time since last fight
Championship / 5-round
Three-round fight
No recent UFC tape in the book.
No recent UFC tape in the book.
Sign in to request a written analyst note on this fight.