UFC 333: Volkanovski vs. Evloev · Lightweight · 3 rounds
Opening locked Aug 19, 2026 · Grant Dawson 62% · Submission · Distance · waiting on the result
Grant Dawson
62.4%
Nurullo Aliev
37.6%
Model win probability · confidence 56%
No market posted yet.
Why the model leans this way
Grant Dawson is the model side at 62.4% because the largest live edges sit where this fight is likely to be fought. Grappler historical edge: Dawson (ground 76) into Aliev (TD reaction 66). Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly. Ground game is the clearest separator: Dawson 76 (B) vs Aliev 42 (D). Dawson brings 3.8 TD/15 and 14 sub wins into Aliev's 77% takedown defense.
Ground game
DawsonDawson 76 (B) vs Aliev 42 (D). Dawson brings 3.8 TD/15 and 14 sub wins into Aliev's 77% takedown defense.
Durability
AlievAliev 85 (A) vs Dawson 75 (B). Aliev has been finished by strikes 0 times; Dawson 0.
Counter punching
DawsonDawson 56 (C) vs Aliev 47 (D). Dawson's return is the live one (0.20 KD/15, 0 KOs) against Aliev's entries.
Punching agility
DawsonDawson 57 (C) vs Aliev 50 (C). Hand speed / output lean Dawson (3.2 SLpM at 65%).
Path · Dawson
Dawson has to wrestle early, chain the second shot, and make Aliev defend the neck instead of throwing. That is the percentage path.
Path · Aliev
Aliev has to stuff the first takedown (66 TD-reaction), keep this standing, and hunt a pocket that grades 63 on defense. Wrestling is the death lane.
A one-score fight on the model. Any three-minute pocket explosion or a stuck takedown against the grain wipes a lot of this number.
Style and location. Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish. Dawson is built as: Hybrid who can change levels. Aliev is built as: Hybrid who can change levels. Fight IQ delta is +2 toward Dawson — that is composure, win-lane diversity, and whether they solve a second problem when the first look dies.
The edges that move the number. Ground game: Dawson 76 (B) vs Aliev 42 (D). Dawson brings 3.8 TD/15 and 14 sub wins into Aliev's 77% takedown defense. Durability: Aliev 85 (A) vs Dawson 75 (B). Aliev has been finished by strikes 0 times; Dawson 0. Counter punching: Dawson 56 (C) vs Aliev 47 (D). Dawson's return is the live one (0.20 KD/15, 0 KOs) against Aliev's entries.
The finish path leans the mat (43% submission). Once a takedown sticks, the neck becomes the whole fight. A one-score fight on the model. Any three-minute pocket explosion or a stuck takedown against the grain wipes a lot of this number. These trait marks are derived from FightMetric rates, career method shares, and loaded bout rows — reaction time and agility are proxies, not stopwatch numbers. The model folds the same scores into win probability, so a hole on this card is a hole in the percentage.
Fight IQ, ground game, defense, counter punching, reaction, agility, and takedown reaction — scored from tape and folded into the win number above.
Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish.
R1
29%
R2
19%
R3
22%
Dist
30%
Most likely: Distance. Expected 9.3 minutes.
Grappler historical edge: Dawson (ground 76) into Aliev (TD reaction 66). Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly.
Ground game (tape)
76 vs 42
Striking differential
-0.27 vs -0.93 SLpM−SApM (recency / opp. adjusted)
Grappling composite
TD avg × acc × def + control + submission threat (adj.)
Striking efficiency
65% vs 57%
Damage ratio
0.92 vs 0.75 landed/absorbed
Counter punching
56 vs 47
Durability
0 vs 0 KO losses
Style interaction
Grappler historical edge: Dawson (ground 76) into Aliev (TD reaction 66). Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly.
Output (SLpM)
3.21 vs 2.72
Punching agility
Output × accuracy × age curve
Fight IQ
B 74 vs B 72 — composure, win-lane diversity, adjustments
Recency form
Opp.-adjusted last 0/0 UFC rows
Age-adjusted curve
32 vs 25
Takedown reaction
70% vs 77% hips on the shot
Timing & reaction
Defense + absorb + knockdown timing proxy
Striking defense
62% vs 63%
Takedown mismatch
TD def 70% vs 77%
Pocket defense (tape)
C+ vs C+
Cardio proxy
Output sustainability + distance rate
Reach / length
72.0" vs 72.0"
Strength of schedule
Opp. quality 50 vs 50
Layoff / rust
Time since last fight
Championship / 5-round
Three-round fight
No recent UFC tape in the book.
No recent UFC tape in the book.
Sign in to request a written analyst note on this fight.