UFC 329: McGregor vs. Holloway 2 · Lightweight · 3 rounds
Opening locked Aug 19, 2026 · Terrance McKinney 62% · Submission · Round 1 · scored miss (King Green / KO/TKO)
King Green
37.9%
Terrance McKinney
62.1%
Model win probability · confidence 56%
No market posted yet.
Why the model leans this way
Terrance McKinney is the model side at 62.1% because the largest live edges sit where this fight is likely to be fought. Grappler historical edge: McKinney (ground 78) into Green (TD reaction 62). Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly. Ground game is the clearest separator: McKinney 78 (B+) vs Green 40 (D). McKinney brings 3.3 TD/15 and 9 sub wins into Green's 80% takedown defense.
Ground game
McKinneyMcKinney 78 (B+) vs Green 40 (D). McKinney brings 3.3 TD/15 and 9 sub wins into Green's 80% takedown defense.
Punching agility
McKinneyMcKinney 80 (B+) vs Green 67 (C+). Hand speed / output lean McKinney (6.5 SLpM at 59%).
Takedown reaction
GreenGreen 62 (C+) vs McKinney 54 (C). When the shot comes, Green stuffs it at 80% — McKinney is at 72%.
Counter punching
McKinneyMcKinney 43 (D) vs Green 36 (D). McKinney's return is the live one (0.52 KD/15, 0 KOs) against Green's entries.
Path · Green
Green has to stuff the first takedown (62 TD-reaction), keep this standing, and hunt a pocket that grades 73 on defense. Wrestling is the death lane.
Path · McKinney
McKinney has to wrestle early, chain the second shot, and make Green defend the neck instead of throwing. That is the percentage path.
A one-score fight on the model. Any three-minute pocket explosion or a stuck takedown against the grain wipes a lot of this number.
Style and location. Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish. McKinney is built as: Volume pressure striker — suspect hips against the shot. Green is built as: Volume pressure striker. Fight IQ delta is -3 toward Green — that is composure, win-lane diversity, and whether they solve a second problem when the first look dies.
The edges that move the number. Ground game: McKinney 78 (B+) vs Green 40 (D). McKinney brings 3.3 TD/15 and 9 sub wins into Green's 80% takedown defense. Punching agility: McKinney 80 (B+) vs Green 67 (C+). Hand speed / output lean McKinney (6.5 SLpM at 59%). Takedown reaction: Green 62 (C+) vs McKinney 54 (C). When the shot comes, Green stuffs it at 80% — McKinney is at 72%.
The finish path leans the mat (44% submission). Once a takedown sticks, the neck becomes the whole fight. A one-score fight on the model. Any three-minute pocket explosion or a stuck takedown against the grain wipes a lot of this number. These trait marks are derived from FightMetric rates, career method shares, and loaded bout rows — reaction time and agility are proxies, not stopwatch numbers. The model folds the same scores into win probability, so a hole on this card is a hole in the percentage.
Fight IQ, ground game, defense, counter punching, reaction, agility, and takedown reaction — scored from tape and folded into the win number above.
Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish.
R1
36%
R2
22%
R3
23%
Dist
20%
Most likely: Round 1. Expected 8.3 minutes.
Grappler historical edge: McKinney (ground 78) into Green (TD reaction 62). Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly.
Ground game (tape)
40 vs 78
Grappling composite
TD avg × acc × def + control + submission threat (adj.)
Punching agility
Output × accuracy × age curve
Takedown reaction
80% vs 72% hips on the shot
Age-adjusted curve
39 vs 31
Counter punching
36 vs 43
Reach / length
71.0" vs 73.5"
Fight IQ
C+ 62 vs C 59 — composure, win-lane diversity, adjustments
Durability
0 vs 0 KO losses
Style interaction
Grappler historical edge: McKinney (ground 78) into Green (TD reaction 62). Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly.
Striking efficiency
56% vs 59%
Timing & reaction
Defense + absorb + knockdown timing proxy
Damage ratio
2.76 vs 2.83 landed/absorbed
Striking differential
4.12 vs 4.22 SLpM−SApM (recency / opp. adjusted)
Takedown mismatch
TD def 80% vs 72%
Output (SLpM)
6.46 vs 6.53
Recency form
Opp.-adjusted last 0/0 UFC rows
Striking defense
55% vs 55%
Pocket defense (tape)
B vs B
Cardio proxy
Output sustainability + distance rate
Strength of schedule
Opp. quality 50 vs 50
Layoff / rust
Time since last fight
Championship / 5-round
Three-round fight
No recent UFC tape in the book.
No recent UFC tape in the book.
Sign in to request a written analyst note on this fight.