UFC 329: McGregor vs. Holloway 2 · Bantamweight · 3 rounds
Opening locked Aug 19, 2026 · Adrian Yañez 75% · Decision · Distance · scored hit (Adrian Yañez / KO/TKO)
Cody Garbrandt
24.9%
Adrian Yañez
75.1%
Model win probability · confidence 71%
No market posted yet.
Why the model leans this way
Adrian Yañez is the model side at 75.1% because the largest live edges sit where this fight is likely to be fought. hybrid meets striker. Counter punching is the clearest separator: Garbrandt 59 (C) vs Yañez 36 (D). Garbrandt's return is the live one (0.73 KD/15, 8 KOs) against Yañez's entries.
Counter punching
GarbrandtGarbrandt 59 (C) vs Yañez 36 (D). Garbrandt's return is the live one (0.73 KD/15, 8 KOs) against Yañez's entries.
Punching agility
YañezYañez 65 (C+) vs Garbrandt 42 (D). Hand speed / output lean Yañez (6.0 SLpM at 42%).
Striking defense
YañezYañez 71 (B) vs Garbrandt 63 (C+). Yañez absorbs 2.51/min at 56% defense; Garbrandt is a softer target at 3.62 SApM.
Durability
YañezYañez 85 (A) vs Garbrandt 77 (B+). Yañez has been finished by strikes 0 times; Garbrandt 0.
Path · Garbrandt
Garbrandt wins by forcing the fight into durability and denying Yañez a long look at durability.
Path · Yañez
Volume. Yañez wins ugly minutes at range, clutter the center, and never give Garbrandt a clean reset.
This is a firm lean, not a lock. The upset script is Garbrandt attacking ground game with durability.
Style and location. The fight should spend most of its minutes at range. Yañez is built as: Volume pressure striker. Garbrandt is built as: Hybrid who can change levels. Fight IQ delta is -6 toward Garbrandt — that is composure, win-lane diversity, and whether they solve a second problem when the first look dies.
The edges that move the number. Counter punching: Garbrandt 59 (C) vs Yañez 36 (D). Garbrandt's return is the live one (0.73 KD/15, 8 KOs) against Yañez's entries. Punching agility: Yañez 65 (C+) vs Garbrandt 42 (D). Hand speed / output lean Yañez (6.0 SLpM at 42%). Striking defense: Yañez 71 (B) vs Garbrandt 63 (C+). Yañez absorbs 2.51/min at 56% defense; Garbrandt is a softer target at 3.62 SApM.
The finish path leans strikes (39% KO/TKO vs 13% submission). One clean read in the pocket can flip a close card. This is a firm lean, not a lock. The upset script is Garbrandt attacking ground game with durability. These trait marks are derived from FightMetric rates, career method shares, and loaded bout rows — reaction time and agility are proxies, not stopwatch numbers. The model folds the same scores into win probability, so a hole on this card is a hole in the percentage.
Fight IQ, ground game, defense, counter punching, reaction, agility, and takedown reaction — scored from tape and folded into the win number above.
The fight should spend most of its minutes at range.
R1
27%
R2
13%
R3
12%
Dist
48%
Most likely: Distance. Expected 10.3 minutes.
hybrid meets striker.
Striking differential
-0.83 vs 3.45 SLpM−SApM (recency / opp. adjusted)
Damage ratio
0.77 vs 2.37 landed/absorbed
Output (SLpM)
2.79 vs 5.96
Counter punching
59 vs 36
Punching agility
Output × accuracy × age curve
Striking defense
62% vs 56%
Reach / length
65.5" vs 70.0"
Fight IQ
C 57 vs C 52 — composure, win-lane diversity, adjustments
Ground game (tape)
21 vs 14
Pocket defense (tape)
C+ vs B
Durability
0 vs 0 KO losses
Takedown reaction
82% vs 85% hips on the shot
Grappling composite
TD avg × acc × def + control + submission threat (adj.)
Timing & reaction
Defense + absorb + knockdown timing proxy
Recency form
Opp.-adjusted last 0/0 UFC rows
Cardio proxy
Output sustainability + distance rate
Age-adjusted curve
35 vs 32
Striking efficiency
43% vs 42%
Takedown mismatch
TD def 82% vs 85%
Strength of schedule
Opp. quality 50 vs 50
Style interaction
hybrid meets striker.
Layoff / rust
Time since last fight
Championship / 5-round
Three-round fight
No recent UFC tape in the book.
No recent UFC tape in the book.
Sign in to request a written analyst note on this fight.