UFC Fight Night: Fiziev vs. Torres · Flyweight · 3 rounds
Opening locked Aug 19, 2026 · Charles Johnson 54% · Decision · Distance · scored miss (Asu Almabayev / Submission)

KazakhstanAsu Almabayev
“Zulfikar”
Unranked · 24-3 · wrestler · Orthodox · 32 · IQ B 74
Dar Pro Team Kazakhstan · Kazakhstan
Asu Almabayev
45.9%
Charles Johnson
54.1%
Model win probability · confidence 47%
No market posted yet.
Why the model leans this way
Charles Johnson is the model side at 54.1% because the largest live edges sit where this fight is likely to be fought. Grappler historical edge: Almabayev (ground 88) into Johnson (TD reaction 65). Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly. Ground game is the clearest separator: Almabayev 88 (A) vs Johnson 25 (D). Almabayev brings 4.7 TD/15 and 11 sub wins into Johnson's 83% takedown defense.
Ground game
AlmabayevAlmabayev 88 (A) vs Johnson 25 (D). Almabayev brings 4.7 TD/15 and 11 sub wins into Johnson's 83% takedown defense.
Punching agility
JohnsonJohnson 57 (C) vs Almabayev 47 (D). Hand speed / output lean Johnson (4.6 SLpM at 55%).
Fight IQ
AlmabayevAlmabayev 74 (B) vs Johnson 65 (C+). Problem-solving and win-lane diversity sit with Almabayev (B vs C+).
Timing & reaction
JohnsonJohnson 63 (C+) vs Almabayev 57 (C). The reaction proxy — defense plus absorb plus knockdown timing — sits with Johnson.
Path · Almabayev
Almabayev has to wrestle early, chain the second shot, and make Johnson defend the neck instead of throwing. It is the only reliable flip if the pocket goes cold.
Path · Johnson
Johnson has to stuff the first takedown (65 TD-reaction), keep this standing, and hunt a pocket that grades 62 on defense. Wrestling is the death lane.
A one-score fight on the model. Any three-minute pocket explosion or a stuck takedown against the grain wipes a lot of this number.
Style and location. Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish. Johnson is built as: Pocket striker. Almabayev is built as: Chain-wrestling grappler. Fight IQ delta is -9 toward Almabayev — that is composure, win-lane diversity, and whether they solve a second problem when the first look dies.
The edges that move the number. Ground game: Almabayev 88 (A) vs Johnson 25 (D). Almabayev brings 4.7 TD/15 and 11 sub wins into Johnson's 83% takedown defense. Punching agility: Johnson 57 (C) vs Almabayev 47 (D). Hand speed / output lean Johnson (4.6 SLpM at 55%). Fight IQ: Almabayev 74 (B) vs Johnson 65 (C+). Problem-solving and win-lane diversity sit with Almabayev (B vs C+).
The finish path leans the mat (30% submission). Once a takedown sticks, the neck becomes the whole fight. A one-score fight on the model. Any three-minute pocket explosion or a stuck takedown against the grain wipes a lot of this number. These trait marks are derived from FightMetric rates, career method shares, and loaded bout rows — reaction time and agility are proxies, not stopwatch numbers. The model folds the same scores into win probability, so a hole on this card is a hole in the percentage.
Fight IQ, ground game, defense, counter punching, reaction, agility, and takedown reaction — scored from tape and folded into the win number above.
Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish.
R1
23%
R2
15%
R3
17%
Dist
45%
Most likely: Distance. Expected 10.5 minutes.
Grappler historical edge: Almabayev (ground 88) into Johnson (TD reaction 65). Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly.
Striking differential
-1.52 vs 1.61 SLpM−SApM (recency / opp. adjusted)
Ground game (tape)
88 vs 25
Damage ratio
0.60 vs 1.54 landed/absorbed
Grappling composite
TD avg × acc × def + control + submission threat (adj.)
Output (SLpM)
2.28 vs 4.60
Fight IQ
B 74 vs C+ 65 — composure, win-lane diversity, adjustments
Reach / length
65.0" vs 70.0"
Striking defense
63% vs 59%
Striking efficiency
61% vs 55%
Punching agility
Output × accuracy × age curve
Recency form
Opp.-adjusted last 0/0 UFC rows
Style interaction
Grappler historical edge: Almabayev (ground 88) into Johnson (TD reaction 65). Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly.
Pocket defense (tape)
C+ vs C+
Timing & reaction
Defense + absorb + knockdown timing proxy
Durability
0 vs 0 KO losses
Age-adjusted curve
32 vs 35
Takedown reaction
66% vs 83% hips on the shot
Takedown mismatch
TD def 66% vs 83%
Cardio proxy
Output sustainability + distance rate
Counter punching
47 vs 45
Strength of schedule
Opp. quality 50 vs 50
Layoff / rust
Time since last fight
Championship / 5-round
Three-round fight
No recent UFC tape in the book.
No recent UFC tape in the book.
Sign in to request a written analyst note on this fight.