UFC Fight Night: Fiziev vs. Torres · Bantamweight · 3 rounds
Opening locked Aug 19, 2026 · Jean Matsumoto 83% · Decision · Distance · scored hit (Jean Matsumoto / Decision - Unanimous)

KazakhstanBekzat Almakhan
“The Turan Warrior”
Unranked · 12-4 · hybrid · Orthodox · 28 · IQ C 53
Kazakhstan
Bekzat Almakhan
17.2%
Jean Matsumoto
82.8%
Model win probability · confidence 80%
No market posted yet.
Why the model leans this way
Jean Matsumoto is the model side at 82.8% because the largest live edges sit where this fight is likely to be fought. Grappler historical edge: Matsumoto (ground 60) into Almakhan (TD reaction 61). Ground game is the clearest separator: Matsumoto 60 (C) vs Almakhan 14 (D). Matsumoto brings 3.0 TD/15 and 6 sub wins into Almakhan's 85% takedown defense.
Ground game
MatsumotoMatsumoto 60 (C) vs Almakhan 14 (D). Matsumoto brings 3.0 TD/15 and 6 sub wins into Almakhan's 85% takedown defense.
Punching agility
MatsumotoMatsumoto 57 (C) vs Almakhan 37 (D). Hand speed / output lean Matsumoto (5.4 SLpM at 45%).
Fight IQ
MatsumotoMatsumoto 69 (B) vs Almakhan 53 (C). Problem-solving and win-lane diversity sit with Matsumoto (B vs C).
Striking defense
MatsumotoMatsumoto 69 (B) vs Almakhan 62 (C+). Matsumoto absorbs 2.72/min at 57% defense; Almakhan is a softer target at 3.70 SApM.
Path · Almakhan
Almakhan has to stuff the first takedown (61 TD-reaction), keep this standing, and hunt a pocket that grades 69 on defense. Wrestling is the death lane.
Path · Matsumoto
Matsumoto has to wrestle early, chain the second shot, and make Almakhan defend the neck instead of throwing. That is the percentage path.
This is a firm lean, not a lock. The upset script is Almakhan attacking counter punching with durability.
Style and location. Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish. Matsumoto is built as: Pocket striker. Almakhan is built as: Hybrid who can change levels. Fight IQ delta is +16 toward Matsumoto — that is composure, win-lane diversity, and whether they solve a second problem when the first look dies.
The edges that move the number. Ground game: Matsumoto 60 (C) vs Almakhan 14 (D). Matsumoto brings 3.0 TD/15 and 6 sub wins into Almakhan's 85% takedown defense. Punching agility: Matsumoto 57 (C) vs Almakhan 37 (D). Hand speed / output lean Matsumoto (5.4 SLpM at 45%). Fight IQ: Matsumoto 69 (B) vs Almakhan 53 (C). Problem-solving and win-lane diversity sit with Matsumoto (B vs C).
The clock is live — decision is the modal ending (49%). Minutes and control matter more than a single shot. This is a firm lean, not a lock. The upset script is Almakhan attacking counter punching with durability. These trait marks are derived from FightMetric rates, career method shares, and loaded bout rows — reaction time and agility are proxies, not stopwatch numbers. The model folds the same scores into win probability, so a hole on this card is a hole in the percentage.
Fight IQ, ground game, defense, counter punching, reaction, agility, and takedown reaction — scored from tape and folded into the win number above.
Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish.
R1
20%
R2
14%
R3
16%
Dist
49%
Most likely: Distance. Expected 10.9 minutes.
Grappler historical edge: Matsumoto (ground 60) into Almakhan (TD reaction 61).
Striking differential
-1.12 vs 2.65 SLpM−SApM (recency / opp. adjusted)
Ground game (tape)
14 vs 60
Damage ratio
0.70 vs 1.97 landed/absorbed
Output (SLpM)
2.58 vs 5.37
Fight IQ
C 53 vs B 69 — composure, win-lane diversity, adjustments
Grappling composite
TD avg × acc × def + control + submission threat (adj.)
Punching agility
Output × accuracy × age curve
Striking defense
63% vs 57%
Striking efficiency
39% vs 45%
Pocket defense (tape)
C+ vs B
Style interaction
Grappler historical edge: Matsumoto (ground 60) into Almakhan (TD reaction 61).
Recency form
Opp.-adjusted last 0/0 UFC rows
Timing & reaction
Defense + absorb + knockdown timing proxy
Takedown reaction
85% vs 73% hips on the shot
Counter punching
33 vs 30
Cardio proxy
Output sustainability + distance rate
Takedown mismatch
TD def 85% vs 73%
Durability
0 vs 0 KO losses
Reach / length
68.0" vs 68.5"
Age-adjusted curve
28 vs 26
Strength of schedule
Opp. quality 50 vs 50
Layoff / rust
Time since last fight
Championship / 5-round
Three-round fight
No recent UFC tape in the book.
No recent UFC tape in the book.
Sign in to request a written analyst note on this fight.