UFC Fight Night: Kape vs. Horiguchi 2 · Flyweight · 5 rounds
Opening locked Aug 19, 2026 · Manel Kape 61% · Decision · Distance · scored hit (Manel Kape / KO/TKO)

PortugalManel Kape
“Starboy”
Unranked · 23-7 · striker · Southpaw · 32 · IQ C+ 66
Xtreme Couture · Portugal
Manel Kape
61.0%
Kyoji Horiguchi
39.0%
Model win probability · confidence 55%
No market posted yet.
Why the model leans this way
Manel Kape is the model side at 61.0% because the largest live edges sit where this fight is likely to be fought. Striker vs striker. The pocket and the counter become the whole fight. Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly. Punching agility is the clearest separator: Kape 67 (C+) vs Horiguchi 51 (C). Hand speed / output lean Kape (5.0 SLpM at 57%).
Punching agility
KapeKape 67 (C+) vs Horiguchi 51 (C). Hand speed / output lean Kape (5.0 SLpM at 57%).
Ground game
HoriguchiHoriguchi 37 (D) vs Kape 27 (D). Horiguchi brings 1.6 TD/15 and 6 sub wins into Kape's 83% takedown defense.
Timing & reaction
KapeKape 70 (B) vs Horiguchi 60 (C). The reaction proxy — defense plus absorb plus knockdown timing — sits with Kape.
Fight IQ
HoriguchiHoriguchi 71 (B) vs Kape 66 (C+). Problem-solving and win-lane diversity sit with Horiguchi (B vs C+).
Path · Kape
Volume. Kape wins ugly minutes at range, clutter the center, and never give Horiguchi a clean reset.
Path · Horiguchi
Horiguchi has to wrestle early, chain the second shot, and make Kape defend the neck instead of throwing. It is the only reliable flip if the pocket goes cold.
A one-score fight on the model. Any three-minute pocket explosion or a stuck takedown against the grain wipes a lot of this number.
Style and location. Almost exclusively standing. Power and volume decide it. Kape is built as: Pocket striker — southpaw. Horiguchi is built as: Pocket striker. Fight IQ delta is -5 toward Horiguchi — that is composure, win-lane diversity, and whether they solve a second problem when the first look dies.
The edges that move the number. Punching agility: Kape 67 (C+) vs Horiguchi 51 (C). Hand speed / output lean Kape (5.0 SLpM at 57%). Ground game: Horiguchi 37 (D) vs Kape 27 (D). Horiguchi brings 1.6 TD/15 and 6 sub wins into Kape's 83% takedown defense. Timing & reaction: Kape 70 (B) vs Horiguchi 60 (C). The reaction proxy — defense plus absorb plus knockdown timing — sits with Kape.
The finish path leans strikes (38% KO/TKO vs 21% submission). One clean read in the pocket can flip a close card. A one-score fight on the model. Any three-minute pocket explosion or a stuck takedown against the grain wipes a lot of this number. These trait marks are derived from FightMetric rates, career method shares, and loaded bout rows — reaction time and agility are proxies, not stopwatch numbers. The model folds the same scores into win probability, so a hole on this card is a hole in the percentage.
Fight IQ, ground game, defense, counter punching, reaction, agility, and takedown reaction — scored from tape and folded into the win number above.
Almost exclusively standing. Power and volume decide it.
R1
26%
R2
16%
R3
12%
R4
2%
R5
3%
Dist
41%
Most likely: Distance. Expected 14.5 minutes.
Striker vs striker. The pocket and the counter become the whole fight. Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly.
Striking differential
2.20 vs 0.49 SLpM−SApM (recency / opp. adjusted)
Damage ratio
1.77 vs 1.15 landed/absorbed
Ground game (tape)
27 vs 37
Output (SLpM)
5.04 vs 3.77
Reach / length
68.0" vs 63.0"
Punching agility
Output × accuracy × age curve
Fight IQ
C+ 66 vs B 71 — composure, win-lane diversity, adjustments
Timing & reaction
Defense + absorb + knockdown timing proxy
Striking defense
58% vs 60%
Grappling composite
TD avg × acc × def + control + submission threat (adj.)
Pocket defense (tape)
C+ vs C+
Recency form
Opp.-adjusted last 0/0 UFC rows
Age-adjusted curve
32 vs 35
Takedown reaction
83% vs 79% hips on the shot
Cardio proxy
Output sustainability + distance rate
Counter punching
49 vs 48
Style interaction
Striker vs striker. The pocket and the counter become the whole fight. Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly.
Takedown mismatch
TD def 83% vs 79%
Striking efficiency
57% vs 57%
Strength of schedule
Opp. quality 50 vs 50
Layoff / rust
Time since last fight
Championship / 5-round
Five-round experience matters
Durability
0 vs 0 KO losses
No recent UFC tape in the book.
No recent UFC tape in the book.
Sign in to request a written analyst note on this fight.