UFC 329: McGregor vs. Holloway 2 · Welterweight · 5 rounds
Opening locked Aug 19, 2026 · Conor McGregor 66% · KO/TKO · Distance · scored miss (Max Holloway / KO/TKO)

IrelandConor McGregor
“The Notorious”
Unranked · 22-7 · striker · Southpaw · 38 · IQ C 51
SBG Ireland · Ireland
Conor McGregor
65.8%
Max Holloway
34.2%
Model win probability · confidence 63%
No market posted yet.
Why the model leans this way
Conor McGregor is the model side at 65.8% because the largest live edges sit where this fight is likely to be fought. Striker vs striker. The pocket and the counter become the whole fight. Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly. Timing & reaction is the clearest separator: McGregor 66 (C+) vs Holloway 38 (D). The reaction proxy — defense plus absorb plus knockdown timing — sits with McGregor.
Timing & reaction
McGregorMcGregor 66 (C+) vs Holloway 38 (D). The reaction proxy — defense plus absorb plus knockdown timing — sits with McGregor.
Striking defense
McGregorMcGregor 69 (B) vs Holloway 51 (C). McGregor absorbs 2.76/min at 57% defense; Holloway is a softer target at 4.18 SApM.
Fight IQ
HollowayHolloway 64 (C+) vs McGregor 51 (C). Problem-solving and win-lane diversity sit with Holloway (C+ vs C).
Counter punching
McGregorMcGregor 51 (C) vs Holloway 38 (D). McGregor's return is the live one (0.77 KD/15, 0 KOs) against Holloway's entries.
Path · McGregor
McGregor wins by forcing the fight into durability and denying Holloway a long look at durability.
Path · Holloway
Holloway wins by forcing the fight into durability and denying McGregor a long look at durability.
A one-score fight on the model. Any three-minute pocket explosion or a stuck takedown against the grain wipes a lot of this number.
Style and location. Almost exclusively standing. Power and volume decide it. McGregor is built as: Pocket striker — suspect hips against the shot, southpaw. Holloway is built as: Power striker — suspect hips against the shot, porous pocket. Fight IQ delta is -13 toward Holloway — that is composure, win-lane diversity, and whether they solve a second problem when the first look dies.
The edges that move the number. Timing & reaction: McGregor 66 (C+) vs Holloway 38 (D). The reaction proxy — defense plus absorb plus knockdown timing — sits with McGregor. Striking defense: McGregor 69 (B) vs Holloway 51 (C). McGregor absorbs 2.76/min at 57% defense; Holloway is a softer target at 4.18 SApM. Fight IQ: Holloway 64 (C+) vs McGregor 51 (C). Problem-solving and win-lane diversity sit with Holloway (C+ vs C).
The finish path leans strikes (48% KO/TKO vs 11% submission). One clean read in the pocket can flip a close card. A one-score fight on the model. Any three-minute pocket explosion or a stuck takedown against the grain wipes a lot of this number. These trait marks are derived from FightMetric rates, career method shares, and loaded bout rows — reaction time and agility are proxies, not stopwatch numbers. The model folds the same scores into win probability, so a hole on this card is a hole in the percentage.
Fight IQ, ground game, defense, counter punching, reaction, agility, and takedown reaction — scored from tape and folded into the win number above.
Almost exclusively standing. Power and volume decide it.
R1
30%
R2
15%
R3
12%
R4
1%
R5
1%
Dist
41%
Most likely: Distance. Expected 13.9 minutes.
Striker vs striker. The pocket and the counter become the whole fight. Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly.
Striking differential
2.51 vs 1.18 SLpM−SApM (recency / opp. adjusted)
Damage ratio
1.91 vs 1.28 landed/absorbed
Fight IQ
C 51 vs C+ 64 — composure, win-lane diversity, adjustments
Timing & reaction
Defense + absorb + knockdown timing proxy
Pocket defense (tape)
B vs C
Striking defense
57% vs 50%
Recency form
Opp.-adjusted last 0/2 UFC rows
Strength of schedule
Opp. quality 50 vs 88
Counter punching
51 vs 38
Reach / length
74.0" vs 69.0"
Takedown reaction
82% vs 67% hips on the shot
Punching agility
Output × accuracy × age curve
Grappling composite
TD avg × acc × def + control + submission threat (adj.)
Age-adjusted curve
38 vs 34
Durability
0 vs 0 KO losses
Striking efficiency
56% vs 53%
Cardio proxy
Output sustainability + distance rate
Ground game (tape)
30 vs 29
Output (SLpM)
5.27 vs 5.41
Takedown mismatch
TD def 82% vs 66%
Style interaction
Striker vs striker. The pocket and the counter become the whole fight. Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly.
Layoff / rust
Time since last fight
Championship / 5-round
Five-round experience matters
No recent UFC tape in the book.
Charles Oliveira
Decision - Unanimous · R5 5:00
Yair Rodriguez
Decision - Unanimous · R5 5:00
Sign in to request a written analyst note on this fight.