UFC Fight Night: Moicano vs. Nolan · Welterweight · 3 rounds
Opening locked Oct 2, 2026 · Rodrigo Sezinando 75% · Decision · Distance · waiting on the result
Rodrigo Sezinando
75.2%
Theodor Berggren
24.8%
Model win probability · confidence 71%
No market posted yet.
Why the model leans this way
Rodrigo Sezinando is the model side at 75.2% because the largest live edges sit where this fight is likely to be fought. Grappler historical edge: Sezinando (ground 49) into Berggren (TD reaction 61). Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly. Ground game is the clearest separator: Sezinando 49 (D) vs Berggren 19 (D). Sezinando brings 3.4 TD/15 and 3 sub wins into Berggren's 85% takedown defense.
Ground game
SezinandoSezinando 49 (D) vs Berggren 19 (D). Sezinando brings 3.4 TD/15 and 3 sub wins into Berggren's 85% takedown defense.
Counter punching
BerggrenBerggren 37 (D) vs Sezinando 31 (D). Berggren's return is the live one (0.10 KD/15, 0 KOs) against Sezinando's entries.
Fight IQ
SezinandoSezinando 64 (C+) vs Berggren 58 (C). Problem-solving and win-lane diversity sit with Sezinando (C+ vs C).
Striking defense
SezinandoSezinando 62 (C+) vs Berggren 57 (C). Sezinando absorbs 3.81/min at 64% defense; Berggren is a softer target at 4.60 SApM.
Path · Sezinando
Sezinando has to wrestle early, chain the second shot, and make Berggren defend the neck instead of throwing. That is the percentage path.
Path · Berggren
Berggren has to stuff the first takedown (61 TD-reaction), keep this standing, and hunt a pocket that grades 62 on defense. Wrestling is the death lane.
This is a firm lean, not a lock. The upset script is Berggren attacking counter punching with durability.
Style and location. Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish. Sezinando is built as: Hybrid who can change levels. Berggren is built as: Hybrid who can change levels. Fight IQ delta is +6 toward Sezinando — that is composure, win-lane diversity, and whether they solve a second problem when the first look dies.
The edges that move the number. Ground game: Sezinando 49 (D) vs Berggren 19 (D). Sezinando brings 3.4 TD/15 and 3 sub wins into Berggren's 85% takedown defense. Counter punching: Berggren 37 (D) vs Sezinando 31 (D). Berggren's return is the live one (0.10 KD/15, 0 KOs) against Sezinando's entries. Fight IQ: Sezinando 64 (C+) vs Berggren 58 (C). Problem-solving and win-lane diversity sit with Sezinando (C+ vs C).
The clock is live — decision is the modal ending (50%). Minutes and control matter more than a single shot. This is a firm lean, not a lock. The upset script is Berggren attacking counter punching with durability. These trait marks are derived from FightMetric rates, career method shares, and loaded bout rows — reaction time and agility are proxies, not stopwatch numbers. The model folds the same scores into win probability, so a hole on this card is a hole in the percentage.
Fight IQ, ground game, defense, counter punching, reaction, agility, and takedown reaction — scored from tape and folded into the win number above.
Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish.
R1
20%
R2
14%
R3
16%
Dist
50%
Most likely: Distance. Expected 11 minutes.
Grappler historical edge: Sezinando (ground 49) into Berggren (TD reaction 61). Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly.
Striking differential
-1.56 vs -4.60 SLpM−SApM (recency / opp. adjusted)
Ground game (tape)
49 vs 19
Striking efficiency
28% vs 0%
Damage ratio
0.59 vs 0.00 landed/absorbed
Output (SLpM)
2.25 vs 0.00
Grappling composite
TD avg × acc × def + control + submission threat (adj.)
Fight IQ
C+ 64 vs C 58 — composure, win-lane diversity, adjustments
Reach / length
71.0" vs 75.0"
Striking defense
64% vs 68%
Style interaction
Grappler historical edge: Sezinando (ground 49) into Berggren (TD reaction 61). Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly.
Counter punching
31 vs 37
Recency form
Opp.-adjusted last 0/0 UFC rows
Pocket defense (tape)
C+ vs C
Takedown reaction
72% vs 85% hips on the shot
Punching agility
Output × accuracy × age curve
Takedown mismatch
TD def 72% vs 85%
Cardio proxy
Output sustainability + distance rate
Durability
0 vs 0 KO losses
Age-adjusted curve
28 vs 26
Timing & reaction
Defense + absorb + knockdown timing proxy
Strength of schedule
Opp. quality 50 vs 50
Layoff / rust
Time since last fight
Championship / 5-round
Three-round fight
No recent UFC tape in the book.
No recent UFC tape in the book.
Sign in to request a written analyst note on this fight.