UFC 333: Volkanovski vs. Evloev · Bantamweight · 3 rounds
Opening locked Oct 2, 2026 · Colby Thicknesse 88% · Decision · Distance · waiting on the result

AustraliaColby Thicknesse
“Slickness”
Unranked · 9-1 · striker · Orthodox · 27 · IQ B 71
Freestyle Fighting Gym · Australia
Colby Thicknesse
87.8%
Asaf Chopurov
12.2%
Model win probability · confidence 85%
No market posted yet.
Why the model leans this way
Colby Thicknesse is the model side at 87.8% because the largest live edges sit where this fight is likely to be fought. Grappler historical edge: Thicknesse (ground 31) into Chopurov (TD reaction 69). Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly. Fight IQ is the clearest separator: Thicknesse 71 (B) vs Chopurov 43 (D). Problem-solving and win-lane diversity sit with Thicknesse (B vs D).
Fight IQ
ThicknesseThicknesse 71 (B) vs Chopurov 43 (D). Problem-solving and win-lane diversity sit with Thicknesse (B vs D).
Durability
ThicknesseThicknesse 85 (A) vs Chopurov 65 (C+). Thicknesse has been finished by strikes 0 times; Chopurov 0.
Ground game
ThicknesseThicknesse 31 (D) vs Chopurov 12 (D). Thicknesse brings 1.0 TD/15 and 2 sub wins into Chopurov's 85% takedown defense.
Punching agility
ThicknesseThicknesse 48 (D) vs Chopurov 38 (D). Hand speed / output lean Thicknesse (3.3 SLpM at 50%).
Path · Thicknesse
Thicknesse has to wrestle early, chain the second shot, and make Chopurov defend the neck instead of throwing. That is the percentage path.
Path · Chopurov
Chopurov has to stuff the first takedown (69 TD-reaction), keep this standing, and hunt a pocket that grades 64 on defense. Wrestling is the death lane.
This is a firm lean, not a lock. The upset script is Chopurov attacking ground game with their best weapon.
Style and location. Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish. Thicknesse is built as: Pocket striker. Chopurov is built as: Hybrid who can change levels. Fight IQ delta is +28 toward Thicknesse — that is composure, win-lane diversity, and whether they solve a second problem when the first look dies.
The edges that move the number. Fight IQ: Thicknesse 71 (B) vs Chopurov 43 (D). Problem-solving and win-lane diversity sit with Thicknesse (B vs D). Durability: Thicknesse 85 (A) vs Chopurov 65 (C+). Thicknesse has been finished by strikes 0 times; Chopurov 0. Ground game: Thicknesse 31 (D) vs Chopurov 12 (D). Thicknesse brings 1.0 TD/15 and 2 sub wins into Chopurov's 85% takedown defense.
The clock is live — decision is the modal ending (56%). Minutes and control matter more than a single shot. This is a firm lean, not a lock. The upset script is Chopurov attacking ground game with their best weapon. These trait marks are derived from FightMetric rates, career method shares, and loaded bout rows — reaction time and agility are proxies, not stopwatch numbers. The model folds the same scores into win probability, so a hole on this card is a hole in the percentage.
Fight IQ, ground game, defense, counter punching, reaction, agility, and takedown reaction — scored from tape and folded into the win number above.
Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish.
R1
17%
R2
12%
R3
14%
Dist
56%
Most likely: Distance. Expected 11.5 minutes.
Grappler historical edge: Thicknesse (ground 31) into Chopurov (TD reaction 69). Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly.
Striking differential
-0.10 vs -4.60 SLpM−SApM (recency / opp. adjusted)
Striking efficiency
50% vs 0%
Fight IQ
B 71 vs D 43 — composure, win-lane diversity, adjustments
Damage ratio
0.97 vs 0.00 landed/absorbed
Output (SLpM)
3.33 vs 0.00
Recency form
Opp.-adjusted last 0/0 UFC rows
Ground game (tape)
31 vs 12
Durability
0 vs 0 KO losses
Striking defense
61% vs 68%
Grappling composite
TD avg × acc × def + control + submission threat (adj.)
Punching agility
Output × accuracy × age curve
Pocket defense (tape)
C+ vs C
Style interaction
Grappler historical edge: Thicknesse (ground 31) into Chopurov (TD reaction 69). Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly.
Counter punching
42 vs 37
Timing & reaction
Defense + absorb + knockdown timing proxy
Cardio proxy
Output sustainability + distance rate
Reach / length
69.0" vs 68.0"
Takedown reaction
81% vs 85% hips on the shot
Takedown mismatch
TD def 81% vs 85%
Age-adjusted curve
27 vs 24
Strength of schedule
Opp. quality 50 vs 50
Layoff / rust
Time since last fight
Championship / 5-round
Three-round fight
No recent UFC tape in the book.
No recent UFC tape in the book.
Sign in to request a written analyst note on this fight.