UFC Fight Night: Procházka vs. Stirling · Welterweight · 3 rounds
Opening locked Oct 1, 2026 · Jake Matthews 83% · Decision · Distance · waiting on the result

AustraliaJake Matthews
“The Celtic Kid”
Unranked · 23-8 · striker · Orthodox · 32 · IQ C 58
Nexus · Australia
Jake Matthews
82.5%
Tahir Abdullayev
17.5%
Model win probability · confidence 79%
No market posted yet.
Why the model leans this way
Jake Matthews is the model side at 82.5% because the largest live edges sit where this fight is likely to be fought. Grappler historical edge: Matthews (ground 47) into Abdullayev (TD reaction 59). Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly. Ground game is the clearest separator: Matthews 47 (D) vs Abdullayev 18 (D). Matthews brings 1.4 TD/15 and 9 sub wins into Abdullayev's 85% takedown defense.
Ground game
MatthewsMatthews 47 (D) vs Abdullayev 18 (D). Matthews brings 1.4 TD/15 and 9 sub wins into Abdullayev's 85% takedown defense.
Punching agility
MatthewsMatthews 48 (D) vs Abdullayev 39 (D). Hand speed / output lean Matthews (3.4 SLpM at 53%).
Striking defense
MatthewsMatthews 64 (C+) vs Abdullayev 57 (C). Matthews absorbs 3.42/min at 61% defense; Abdullayev is a softer target at 4.60 SApM.
Counter punching
MatthewsMatthews 44 (D) vs Abdullayev 38 (D). Matthews's return is the live one (0.10 KD/15, 0 KOs) against Abdullayev's entries.
Path · Matthews
Matthews has to wrestle early, chain the second shot, and make Abdullayev defend the neck instead of throwing. That is the percentage path.
Path · Abdullayev
Abdullayev has to stuff the first takedown (59 TD-reaction), keep this standing, and hunt a pocket that grades 64 on defense. Wrestling is the death lane.
This is a firm lean, not a lock. The upset script is Abdullayev attacking counter punching with durability.
Style and location. Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish. Matthews is built as: Pocket striker — suspect hips against the shot. Abdullayev is built as: Hybrid who can change levels. Fight IQ delta is -6 toward Abdullayev — that is composure, win-lane diversity, and whether they solve a second problem when the first look dies.
The edges that move the number. Ground game: Matthews 47 (D) vs Abdullayev 18 (D). Matthews brings 1.4 TD/15 and 9 sub wins into Abdullayev's 85% takedown defense. Punching agility: Matthews 48 (D) vs Abdullayev 39 (D). Hand speed / output lean Matthews (3.4 SLpM at 53%). Striking defense: Matthews 64 (C+) vs Abdullayev 57 (C). Matthews absorbs 3.42/min at 61% defense; Abdullayev is a softer target at 4.60 SApM.
The finish path leans the mat (37% submission). Once a takedown sticks, the neck becomes the whole fight. This is a firm lean, not a lock. The upset script is Abdullayev attacking counter punching with durability. These trait marks are derived from FightMetric rates, career method shares, and loaded bout rows — reaction time and agility are proxies, not stopwatch numbers. The model folds the same scores into win probability, so a hole on this card is a hole in the percentage.
Fight IQ, ground game, defense, counter punching, reaction, agility, and takedown reaction — scored from tape and folded into the win number above.
Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish.
R1
24%
R2
17%
R3
20%
Dist
39%
Most likely: Distance. Expected 10.1 minutes.
Grappler historical edge: Matthews (ground 47) into Abdullayev (TD reaction 59). Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly.
Striking differential
-0.06 vs -4.60 SLpM−SApM (recency / opp. adjusted)
Striking efficiency
53% vs 0%
Damage ratio
0.98 vs 0.00 landed/absorbed
Ground game (tape)
47 vs 18
Output (SLpM)
3.36 vs 0.00
Grappling composite
TD avg × acc × def + control + submission threat (adj.)
Striking defense
61% vs 68%
Fight IQ
C 58 vs C+ 64 — composure, win-lane diversity, adjustments
Style interaction
Grappler historical edge: Matthews (ground 47) into Abdullayev (TD reaction 59). Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly.
Pocket defense (tape)
C+ vs C
Takedown reaction
80% vs 85% hips on the shot
Punching agility
Output × accuracy × age curve
Counter punching
44 vs 38
Recency form
Opp.-adjusted last 0/0 UFC rows
Cardio proxy
Output sustainability + distance rate
Age-adjusted curve
32 vs 29
Timing & reaction
Defense + absorb + knockdown timing proxy
Takedown mismatch
TD def 80% vs 85%
Durability
0 vs 0 KO losses
Reach / length
73.0" vs 73.0"
Strength of schedule
Opp. quality 50 vs 50
Layoff / rust
Time since last fight
Championship / 5-round
Three-round fight
No recent UFC tape in the book.
No recent UFC tape in the book.
Sign in to request a written analyst note on this fight.