UFC Fight Night: Allen vs. Duncan · Women's Strawweight · 3 rounds
Opening locked Oct 2, 2026 · Loopy Godínez 60% · Decision · Distance · scored hit (Loopy Godínez / Decision - Unanimous)
Loopy Godínez
60.1%
Ketlen Souza
39.9%
Model win probability · confidence 54%
Desk
60.1% / 39.9%
Market
66.6% / 33.4%
Moneyline
-218 / +191
Edge
−6.5% Souza
Pinnacle moneyline, two-way de-vigged. Desk leans off the market on Souza. Not a betting tip.
Why the model leans this way
Loopy Godínez is the model side at 60.1% because the largest live edges sit where this fight is likely to be fought. Grappler historical edge: Godínez (ground 59) into Souza (TD reaction 58). Ground game is the clearest separator: Godínez 59 (C) vs Souza 21 (D). Godínez brings 3.0 TD/15 and 2 sub wins into Souza's 83% takedown defense.
Ground game
GodínezGodínez 59 (C) vs Souza 21 (D). Godínez brings 3.0 TD/15 and 2 sub wins into Souza's 83% takedown defense.
Counter punching
SouzaSouza 50 (C) vs Godínez 42 (D). Souza's return is the live one (0.12 KD/15, 0 KOs) against Godínez's entries.
Timing & reaction
SouzaSouza 65 (C+) vs Godínez 60 (C). The reaction proxy — defense plus absorb plus knockdown timing — sits with Souza.
Fight IQ
GodínezGodínez 61 (C+) vs Souza 57 (C). Problem-solving and win-lane diversity sit with Godínez (C+ vs C).
Path · Godínez
Godínez has to wrestle early, chain the second shot, and make Souza defend the neck instead of throwing. That is the percentage path.
Path · Souza
Souza has to stuff the first takedown (58 TD-reaction), keep this standing, and hunt a pocket that grades 66 on defense. Wrestling is the death lane.
A one-score fight on the model. Any three-minute pocket explosion or a stuck takedown against the grain wipes a lot of this number.
Style and location. Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish. Godínez is built as: Hybrid who can change levels. Souza is built as: Pocket striker. Fight IQ delta is +4 toward Godínez — that is composure, win-lane diversity, and whether they solve a second problem when the first look dies.
The edges that move the number. Ground game: Godínez 59 (C) vs Souza 21 (D). Godínez brings 3.0 TD/15 and 2 sub wins into Souza's 83% takedown defense. Counter punching: Souza 50 (C) vs Godínez 42 (D). Souza's return is the live one (0.12 KD/15, 0 KOs) against Godínez's entries. Timing & reaction: Souza 65 (C+) vs Godínez 60 (C). The reaction proxy — defense plus absorb plus knockdown timing — sits with Souza.
The clock is live — decision is the modal ending (55%). Minutes and control matter more than a single shot. A one-score fight on the model. Any three-minute pocket explosion or a stuck takedown against the grain wipes a lot of this number. These trait marks are derived from FightMetric rates, career method shares, and loaded bout rows — reaction time and agility are proxies, not stopwatch numbers. The model folds the same scores into win probability, so a hole on this card is a hole in the percentage.
Fight IQ, ground game, defense, counter punching, reaction, agility, and takedown reaction — scored from tape and folded into the win number above.
Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish.
R1
18%
R2
12%
R3
15%
Dist
55%
Most likely: Distance. Expected 11.4 minutes.
Grappler historical edge: Godínez (ground 59) into Souza (TD reaction 58).
Ground game (tape)
59 vs 21
Grappling composite
TD avg × acc × def + control + submission threat (adj.)
Striking differential
1.38 vs 0.81 SLpM−SApM (recency / opp. adjusted)
Damage ratio
1.45 vs 1.25 landed/absorbed
Striking efficiency
54% vs 61%
Counter punching
42 vs 50
Fight IQ
C+ 61 vs C 57 — composure, win-lane diversity, adjustments
Style interaction
Grappler historical edge: Godínez (ground 59) into Souza (TD reaction 58).
Reach / length
61.0" vs 63.0"
Output (SLpM)
4.43 vs 4.01
Timing & reaction
Defense + absorb + knockdown timing proxy
Takedown reaction
73% vs 83% hips on the shot
Punching agility
Output × accuracy × age curve
Takedown mismatch
TD def 73% vs 83%
Striking defense
59% vs 60%
Recency form
Opp.-adjusted last 0/0 UFC rows
Pocket defense (tape)
C+ vs C+
Cardio proxy
Output sustainability + distance rate
Age-adjusted curve
33 vs 32
Strength of schedule
Opp. quality 50 vs 50
Layoff / rust
Time since last fight
Championship / 5-round
Three-round fight
Durability
0 vs 0 KO losses
No recent UFC tape in the book.
No recent UFC tape in the book.
Sign in to request a written analyst note on this fight.