UFC Fight Night: Buckley vs. Malott · Lightweight · 3 rounds
Opening locked Oct 9, 2026 · Kyle Nelson 53% · Decision · Distance · waiting on the result

CanadaKyle Nelson
“The Monster”
Unranked · 17-7-1 · striker · Switch · 35 · IQ C+ 62
House Of Champions · Canada
Kyle Nelson
52.8%
Cristian Pérez
47.2%
Model win probability · confidence 45%
Desk
52.8% / 47.2%
Market
25.4% / 74.6%
Moneyline
+282 / -330
Edge
+27.4% Nelson
Pinnacle moneyline, two-way de-vigged. Desk is well off the market on Nelson. Not a betting tip.
Why the model leans this way
Kyle Nelson is the model side at 52.8% because the largest live edges sit where this fight is likely to be fought. Grappler historical edge: Pérez (ground 71) into Nelson (TD reaction 63). Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly. Ground game is the clearest separator: Pérez 71 (B) vs Nelson 36 (D). Pérez brings 3.5 TD/15 and 6 sub wins into Nelson's 80% takedown defense.
Ground game
PérezPérez 71 (B) vs Nelson 36 (D). Pérez brings 3.5 TD/15 and 6 sub wins into Nelson's 80% takedown defense.
Fight IQ
PérezPérez 77 (B+) vs Nelson 62 (C+). Problem-solving and win-lane diversity sit with Pérez (B+ vs C+).
Durability
NelsonNelson 85 (A) vs Pérez 81 (B+). Nelson has been finished by strikes 0 times; Pérez 0.
Striking defense
NelsonNelson 64 (C+) vs Pérez 61 (C+). Nelson absorbs 3.34/min at 61% defense; Pérez is a softer target at 4.14 SApM.
Path · Nelson
Nelson has to stuff the first takedown (63 TD-reaction), keep this standing, and hunt a pocket that grades 61 on defense. Wrestling is the death lane.
Path · Pérez
Pérez has to wrestle early, chain the second shot, and make Nelson defend the neck instead of throwing. It is the only reliable flip if the pocket goes cold.
A one-score fight on the model. Any three-minute pocket explosion or a stuck takedown against the grain wipes a lot of this number.
Style and location. Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish. Nelson is built as: Pocket striker. Pérez is built as: Hybrid who can change levels. Fight IQ delta is -14 toward Pérez — that is composure, win-lane diversity, and whether they solve a second problem when the first look dies.
The edges that move the number. Ground game: Pérez 71 (B) vs Nelson 36 (D). Pérez brings 3.5 TD/15 and 6 sub wins into Nelson's 80% takedown defense. Fight IQ: Pérez 77 (B+) vs Nelson 62 (C+). Problem-solving and win-lane diversity sit with Pérez (B+ vs C+). Durability: Nelson 85 (A) vs Pérez 81 (B+). Nelson has been finished by strikes 0 times; Pérez 0.
The finish path leans the mat (29% submission). Once a takedown sticks, the neck becomes the whole fight. A one-score fight on the model. Any three-minute pocket explosion or a stuck takedown against the grain wipes a lot of this number. These trait marks are derived from FightMetric rates, career method shares, and loaded bout rows — reaction time and agility are proxies, not stopwatch numbers. The model folds the same scores into win probability, so a hole on this card is a hole in the percentage.
Fight IQ, ground game, defense, counter punching, reaction, agility, and takedown reaction — scored from tape and folded into the win number above.
Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish.
R1
22%
R2
15%
R3
17%
Dist
46%
Most likely: Distance. Expected 10.6 minutes.
Grappler historical edge: Pérez (ground 71) into Nelson (TD reaction 63). Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly.
Striking differential
0.26 vs -2.83 SLpM−SApM (recency / opp. adjusted)
Ground game (tape)
36 vs 71
Damage ratio
1.08 vs 0.32 landed/absorbed
Fight IQ
C+ 62 vs B+ 77 — composure, win-lane diversity, adjustments
Output (SLpM)
3.60 vs 1.31
Grappling composite
TD avg × acc × def + control + submission threat (adj.)
Striking efficiency
52% vs 66%
Striking defense
61% vs 65%
Age-adjusted curve
35 vs 27
Recency form
Opp.-adjusted last 0/0 UFC rows
Style interaction
Grappler historical edge: Pérez (ground 71) into Nelson (TD reaction 63). Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly.
Pocket defense (tape)
C+ vs C+
Counter punching
46 vs 50
Durability
0 vs 0 KO losses
Reach / length
71.0" vs 72.0"
Cardio proxy
Output sustainability + distance rate
Takedown mismatch
TD def 80% vs 71%
Takedown reaction
80% vs 71% hips on the shot
Timing & reaction
Defense + absorb + knockdown timing proxy
Punching agility
Output × accuracy × age curve
Strength of schedule
Opp. quality 50 vs 50
Layoff / rust
Time since last fight
Championship / 5-round
Three-round fight
No recent UFC tape in the book.
No recent UFC tape in the book.
Sign in to request a written analyst note on this fight.