UFC Fight Night: Rosas Jr. vs. Barcelos · Bantamweight · 3 rounds
Opening locked Aug 28, 2026 · Montel Jackson 57% · Decision · Distance · scored hit (Montel Jackson / KO/TKO)
Montel Jackson
57.0%
Ricky Simon
43.0%
Model win probability · confidence 50%
Desk
57.0% / 43.0%
Market
67.0% / 33.0%
Moneyline
-222 / +195
Edge
−10.0% Simon
Pinnacle moneyline, two-way de-vigged. Desk is well off the market on Simon. Not a betting tip.
Why the model leans this way
Montel Jackson is the model side at 57.0% because the largest live edges sit where this fight is likely to be fought. hybrid meets wrestler. Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly. Counter punching is the clearest separator: Jackson 59 (C) vs Simon 41 (D). Jackson's return is the live one (0.59 KD/15, 0 KOs) against Simon's entries.
Counter punching
JacksonJackson 59 (C) vs Simon 41 (D). Jackson's return is the live one (0.59 KD/15, 0 KOs) against Simon's entries.
Punching agility
JacksonJackson 59 (C) vs Simon 43 (D). Hand speed / output lean Jackson (3.0 SLpM at 62%).
Ground game
SimonSimon 64 (C+) vs Jackson 53 (C). Simon brings 4.5 TD/15 and 4 sub wins into Jackson's 74% takedown defense.
Takedown reaction
JacksonJackson 65 (C+) vs Simon 58 (C). When the shot comes, Jackson stuffs it at 74% — Simon is at 67%.
Path · Jackson
Jackson has to stuff the first takedown (65 TD-reaction), keep this standing, and hunt a pocket that grades 63 on defense. Wrestling is the death lane.
Path · Simon
Simon has to wrestle early, chain the second shot, and make Jackson defend the neck instead of throwing. It is the only reliable flip if the pocket goes cold.
A one-score fight on the model. Any three-minute pocket explosion or a stuck takedown against the grain wipes a lot of this number.
Style and location. The fight should spend most of its minutes at range. Jackson is built as: Hybrid who can change levels — southpaw. Simon is built as: Hybrid who can change levels. Fight IQ delta is +5 toward Jackson — that is composure, win-lane diversity, and whether they solve a second problem when the first look dies.
The edges that move the number. Counter punching: Jackson 59 (C) vs Simon 41 (D). Jackson's return is the live one (0.59 KD/15, 0 KOs) against Simon's entries. Punching agility: Jackson 59 (C) vs Simon 43 (D). Hand speed / output lean Jackson (3.0 SLpM at 62%). Ground game: Simon 64 (C+) vs Jackson 53 (C). Simon brings 4.5 TD/15 and 4 sub wins into Jackson's 74% takedown defense.
The clock is live — decision is the modal ending (53%). Minutes and control matter more than a single shot. A one-score fight on the model. Any three-minute pocket explosion or a stuck takedown against the grain wipes a lot of this number. These trait marks are derived from FightMetric rates, career method shares, and loaded bout rows — reaction time and agility are proxies, not stopwatch numbers. The model folds the same scores into win probability, so a hole on this card is a hole in the percentage.
Fight IQ, ground game, defense, counter punching, reaction, agility, and takedown reaction — scored from tape and folded into the win number above.
The fight should spend most of its minutes at range.
R1
21%
R2
13%
R3
13%
Dist
53%
Most likely: Distance. Expected 11.1 minutes.
hybrid meets wrestler. Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly.
Striking efficiency
62% vs 48%
Counter punching
59 vs 41
Ground game (tape)
53 vs 64
Reach / length
75.5" vs 69.0"
Punching agility
Output × accuracy × age curve
Fight IQ
B 69 vs C+ 64 — composure, win-lane diversity, adjustments
Takedown reaction
74% vs 67% hips on the shot
Grappling composite
TD avg × acc × def + control + submission threat (adj.)
Timing & reaction
Defense + absorb + knockdown timing proxy
Takedown mismatch
TD def 74% vs 67%
Recency form
Opp.-adjusted last 0/0 UFC rows
Style interaction
hybrid meets wrestler. Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly.
Age-adjusted curve
34 vs 33
Damage ratio
0.85 vs 0.86 landed/absorbed
Striking differential
-0.52 vs -0.51 SLpM−SApM (recency / opp. adjusted)
Output (SLpM)
3.02 vs 3.03
Striking defense
62% vs 62%
Strength of schedule
Opp. quality 50 vs 50
Cardio proxy
Output sustainability + distance rate
Layoff / rust
Time since last fight
Championship / 5-round
Three-round fight
Pocket defense (tape)
C+ vs C+
Durability
0 vs 0 KO losses
No recent UFC tape in the book.
No recent UFC tape in the book.
Sign in to request a written analyst note on this fight.