Dana White's Contender Series: Season 10, Week 5 · Light Heavyweight · 3 rounds
Quentin Pasley
48.0%
Arlind Berisha
52.0%
Model win probability · confidence 44%
No market posted yet.
Why the model leans this way
Arlind Berisha is the model side at 52.0% because the largest live edges sit where this fight is likely to be fought. hybrid meets hybrid. Fight IQ is the clearest separator: Berisha 72 (B) vs Pasley 68 (C+). Problem-solving and win-lane diversity sit with Berisha (B vs C+).
Fight IQ
BerishaBerisha 72 (B) vs Pasley 68 (C+). Problem-solving and win-lane diversity sit with Berisha (B vs C+).
Ground game
BerishaBerisha 16 (D) vs Pasley 12 (D). Berisha brings 0.0 TD/15 and 1 sub wins into Pasley's 85% takedown defense.
Punching agility
BerishaBerisha 39 (D) vs Pasley 38 (D). Hand speed / output lean Berisha (0.0 SLpM at 0%).
Timing & reaction
BerishaBerisha 59 (C) vs Pasley 58 (C). The reaction proxy — defense plus absorb plus knockdown timing — sits with Berisha.
Path · Pasley
Pasley wins by forcing the fight into durability and denying Berisha a long look at durability.
Path · Berisha
Berisha wins by forcing the fight into durability and denying Pasley a long look at durability.
A one-score fight on the model. Any three-minute pocket explosion or a stuck takedown against the grain wipes a lot of this number.
Style and location. The fight should spend most of its minutes at range. Berisha is built as: Hybrid who can change levels. Pasley is built as: Hybrid who can change levels. Fight IQ delta is +5 toward Berisha — that is composure, win-lane diversity, and whether they solve a second problem when the first look dies.
The edges that move the number. Fight IQ: Berisha 72 (B) vs Pasley 68 (C+). Problem-solving and win-lane diversity sit with Berisha (B vs C+). Ground game: Berisha 16 (D) vs Pasley 12 (D). Berisha brings 0.0 TD/15 and 1 sub wins into Pasley's 85% takedown defense. Punching agility: Berisha 39 (D) vs Pasley 38 (D). Hand speed / output lean Berisha (0.0 SLpM at 0%).
The clock is live — decision is the modal ending (60%). Minutes and control matter more than a single shot. A one-score fight on the model. Any three-minute pocket explosion or a stuck takedown against the grain wipes a lot of this number. These trait marks are derived from FightMetric rates, career method shares, and loaded bout rows — reaction time and agility are proxies, not stopwatch numbers. The model folds the same scores into win probability, so a hole on this card is a hole in the percentage.
Fight IQ, ground game, defense, counter punching, reaction, agility, and takedown reaction — scored from tape and folded into the win number above.
The fight should spend most of its minutes at range.
R1
16%
R2
11%
R3
13%
Dist
60%
Most likely: Distance. Expected 11.9 minutes.
hybrid meets hybrid.
Fight IQ
C+ 68 vs B 72 — composure, win-lane diversity, adjustments
Ground game (tape)
12 vs 16
Reach / length
78.0" vs 79.0"
Punching agility
Output × accuracy × age curve
Timing & reaction
Defense + absorb + knockdown timing proxy
Striking differential
-4.60 vs -4.60 SLpM−SApM (recency / opp. adjusted)
Damage ratio
0.00 vs 0.00 landed/absorbed
Output (SLpM)
0.00 vs 0.00
Striking efficiency
0% vs 0%
Striking defense
68% vs 68%
Grappling composite
TD avg × acc × def + control + submission threat (adj.)
Takedown mismatch
TD def 85% vs 85%
Age-adjusted curve
0 vs 25
Recency form
Opp.-adjusted last 0/0 UFC rows
Strength of schedule
Opp. quality 50 vs 50
Cardio proxy
Output sustainability + distance rate
Style interaction
hybrid meets hybrid.
Layoff / rust
Time since last fight
Championship / 5-round
Three-round fight
Takedown reaction
85% vs 85% hips on the shot
Pocket defense (tape)
C vs C
Counter punching
37 vs 37
Durability
0 vs 0 KO losses
No recent UFC tape in the book.
No recent UFC tape in the book.
Sign in to request a written analyst note on this fight.