UFC Fight Night: Moicano vs. Nolan · Women's Flyweight · 3 rounds
Opening locked Aug 25, 2026 · Opponent TBA 50% · Decision · Distance · waiting on the result
Lucia Szabova
27.2%
Tainara Lisboa
72.8%
Model win probability · confidence 68%
No market posted yet.
Why the model leans this way
Tainara Lisboa is the model side at 72.8% because the largest live edges sit where this fight is likely to be fought. Grappler historical edge: Lisboa (ground 42) into Szabova (TD reaction 69). Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly. Ground game is the clearest separator: Lisboa 42 (D) vs Szabova 12 (D). Lisboa brings 1.7 TD/15 and 3 sub wins into Szabova's 85% takedown defense.
Ground game
LisboaLisboa 42 (D) vs Szabova 12 (D). Lisboa brings 1.7 TD/15 and 3 sub wins into Szabova's 85% takedown defense.
Takedown reaction
SzabovaSzabova 69 (B) vs Lisboa 53 (C). When the shot comes, Szabova stuffs it at 85% — Lisboa is at 78%.
Fight IQ
SzabovaSzabova 68 (C+) vs Lisboa 57 (C). Problem-solving and win-lane diversity sit with Szabova (C+ vs C).
Counter punching
LisboaLisboa 47 (D) vs Szabova 37 (D). Lisboa's return is the live one (0.10 KD/15, 0 KOs) against Szabova's entries.
Path · Szabova
Szabova has to stuff the first takedown (69 TD-reaction), keep this standing, and hunt a pocket that grades 61 on defense. Wrestling is the death lane.
Path · Lisboa
Lisboa has to wrestle early, chain the second shot, and make Szabova defend the neck instead of throwing. That is the percentage path.
This is a firm lean, not a lock. The upset script is Szabova attacking ground game with durability.
Style and location. Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish. Lisboa is built as: Hybrid who can change levels — suspect hips against the shot. Szabova is built as: Hybrid who can change levels. Fight IQ delta is -11 toward Szabova — that is composure, win-lane diversity, and whether they solve a second problem when the first look dies.
The edges that move the number. Ground game: Lisboa 42 (D) vs Szabova 12 (D). Lisboa brings 1.7 TD/15 and 3 sub wins into Szabova's 85% takedown defense. Takedown reaction: Szabova 69 (B) vs Lisboa 53 (C). When the shot comes, Szabova stuffs it at 85% — Lisboa is at 78%. Fight IQ: Szabova 68 (C+) vs Lisboa 57 (C). Problem-solving and win-lane diversity sit with Szabova (C+ vs C).
The clock is live — decision is the modal ending (49%). Minutes and control matter more than a single shot. This is a firm lean, not a lock. The upset script is Szabova attacking ground game with durability. These trait marks are derived from FightMetric rates, career method shares, and loaded bout rows — reaction time and agility are proxies, not stopwatch numbers. The model folds the same scores into win probability, so a hole on this card is a hole in the percentage.
Fight IQ, ground game, defense, counter punching, reaction, agility, and takedown reaction — scored from tape and folded into the win number above.
Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish.
R1
20%
R2
14%
R3
16%
Dist
49%
Most likely: Distance. Expected 11 minutes.
Grappler historical edge: Lisboa (ground 42) into Szabova (TD reaction 69). Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly.
Striking differential
-4.60 vs -1.89 SLpM−SApM (recency / opp. adjusted)
Striking efficiency
0% vs 61%
Ground game (tape)
12 vs 42
Damage ratio
0.00 vs 0.52 landed/absorbed
Output (SLpM)
0.00 vs 2.01
Fight IQ
C+ 68 vs C 57 — composure, win-lane diversity, adjustments
Takedown reaction
85% vs 78% hips on the shot
Recency form
Opp.-adjusted last 0/0 UFC rows
Grappling composite
TD avg × acc × def + control + submission threat (adj.)
Counter punching
37 vs 47
Striking defense
68% vs 64%
Age-adjusted curve
0 vs 35
Pocket defense (tape)
C vs C+
Durability
0 vs 0 KO losses
Punching agility
Output × accuracy × age curve
Style interaction
Grappler historical edge: Lisboa (ground 42) into Szabova (TD reaction 69). Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly.
Reach / length
68.0" vs 67.0"
Cardio proxy
Output sustainability + distance rate
Takedown mismatch
TD def 85% vs 78%
Timing & reaction
Defense + absorb + knockdown timing proxy
Strength of schedule
Opp. quality 50 vs 50
Layoff / rust
Time since last fight
Championship / 5-round
Three-round fight
No recent UFC tape in the book.
No recent UFC tape in the book.
Sign in to request a written analyst note on this fight.