UFC 334: Gane vs. Hokit · Heavyweight · 5 rounds
Opening locked Sep 9, 2026 · Opponent TBA 50% · Decision · Distance · waiting on the result
Ciryl Gane
33.3%
Josh Hokit
66.7%
Model win probability · confidence 64%
Desk
33.3% / 66.7%
Market
68.9% / 31.1%
Moneyline
-252 / +210
Edge
−35.6% Hokit
Pinnacle moneyline, two-way de-vigged. Desk is well off the market on Hokit. Not a betting tip.
Why the model leans this way
Josh Hokit is the model side at 66.7% because the largest live edges sit where this fight is likely to be fought. Grappler historical edge: Hokit (ground 63) into Gane (TD reaction 67). Ground game is the clearest separator: Hokit 63 (C+) vs Gane 32 (D). Hokit brings 3.7 TD/15 and 3 sub wins into Gane's 100% takedown defense.
Ground game
HokitHokit 63 (C+) vs Gane 32 (D). Hokit brings 3.7 TD/15 and 3 sub wins into Gane's 100% takedown defense.
Punching agility
HokitHokit 95 (A+) vs Gane 69 (B). Hand speed / output lean Hokit (9.3 SLpM at 67%).
Striking defense
GaneGane 94 (A+) vs Hokit 72 (B). Gane absorbs 1.10/min at 75% defense; Hokit is a softer target at 1.40 SApM.
Durability
HokitHokit 83 (B+) vs Gane 61 (C+). Hokit has been finished by strikes 0 times; Gane 0.
Path · Gane
Gane has to stuff the first takedown (67 TD-reaction), keep this standing, and hunt a pocket that grades 72 on defense. Wrestling is the death lane.
Path · Hokit
Hokit has to wrestle early, chain the second shot, and make Gane defend the neck instead of throwing. That is the percentage path.
A one-score fight on the model. Any three-minute pocket explosion or a stuck takedown against the grain wipes a lot of this number.
Style and location. Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish. Hokit is built as: Volume pressure striker — high-IQ problem solver. Gane is built as: Power striker. Fight IQ delta is +7 toward Hokit — that is composure, win-lane diversity, and whether they solve a second problem when the first look dies.
The edges that move the number. Ground game: Hokit 63 (C+) vs Gane 32 (D). Hokit brings 3.7 TD/15 and 3 sub wins into Gane's 100% takedown defense. Punching agility: Hokit 95 (A+) vs Gane 69 (B). Hand speed / output lean Hokit (9.3 SLpM at 67%). Striking defense: Gane 94 (A+) vs Hokit 72 (B). Gane absorbs 1.10/min at 75% defense; Hokit is a softer target at 1.40 SApM.
The finish path leans strikes (55% KO/TKO vs 29% submission). One clean read in the pocket can flip a close card. A one-score fight on the model. Any three-minute pocket explosion or a stuck takedown against the grain wipes a lot of this number. These trait marks are derived from FightMetric rates, career method shares, and loaded bout rows — reaction time and agility are proxies, not stopwatch numbers. The model folds the same scores into win probability, so a hole on this card is a hole in the percentage.
Fight IQ, ground game, defense, counter punching, reaction, agility, and takedown reaction — scored from tape and folded into the win number above.
Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish.
R1
44%
R2
21%
R3
17%
R4
1%
R5
1%
Dist
16%
Most likely: Round 1. Expected 9.2 minutes.
Grappler historical edge: Hokit (ground 63) into Gane (TD reaction 67).
Striking differential
5.38 vs 7.89 SLpM−SApM (recency / opp. adjusted)
Damage ratio
5.49 vs 6.64 landed/absorbed
Striking defense
76% vs 49%
Ground game (tape)
32 vs 63
Output (SLpM)
6.58 vs 9.29
Pocket defense (tape)
A+ vs B
Punching agility
Output × accuracy × age curve
Reach / length
81.0" vs 73.5"
Durability
0 vs 0 KO losses
Grappling composite
TD avg × acc × def + control + submission threat (adj.)
Fight IQ
B 73 vs B+ 80 — composure, win-lane diversity, adjustments
Counter punching
65 vs 53
Strength of schedule
Opp. quality 79 vs 50
Timing & reaction
Defense + absorb + knockdown timing proxy
Age-adjusted curve
36 vs 28
Takedown mismatch
TD def 90% vs 70%
Style interaction
Grappler historical edge: Hokit (ground 63) into Gane (TD reaction 67).
Recency form
Opp.-adjusted last 2/0 UFC rows
Cardio proxy
Output sustainability + distance rate
Takedown reaction
100% vs 70% hips on the shot
Striking efficiency
66% vs 67%
Layoff / rust
Time since last fight
Championship / 5-round
Five-round experience matters
Serghei Spivac
KO/TKO · R2 3:44
Francis Ngannou
Decision - Unanimous · R5 5:00
No recent UFC tape in the book.
Sign in to request a written analyst note on this fight.