UFC Fight Night: Buckley vs. Malott · Middleweight · 3 rounds
Opening locked Aug 19, 2026 · Gilbert Urbina 90% · Decision · Distance · waiting on the result
Julien LeBlanc
10.4%
Gilbert Urbina
89.6%
Model win probability · confidence 86%
No market posted yet.
Why the model leans this way
Gilbert Urbina is the model side at 89.6% because the largest live edges sit where this fight is likely to be fought. Grappler historical edge: Urbina (ground 57) into LeBlanc (TD reaction 59). Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly. Ground game is the clearest separator: Urbina 57 (C) vs LeBlanc 19 (D). Urbina brings 2.7 TD/15 and 2 sub wins into LeBlanc's 85% takedown defense.
Ground game
UrbinaUrbina 57 (C) vs LeBlanc 19 (D). Urbina brings 2.7 TD/15 and 2 sub wins into LeBlanc's 85% takedown defense.
Punching agility
UrbinaUrbina 85 (A) vs LeBlanc 47 (D). Hand speed / output lean Urbina (6.7 SLpM at 65%).
Striking defense
UrbinaUrbina 73 (B) vs LeBlanc 61 (C+). Urbina absorbs 2.26/min at 55% defense; LeBlanc is a softer target at 4.01 SApM.
Counter punching
LeBlancLeBlanc 51 (C) vs Urbina 45 (D). LeBlanc's return is the live one (0.10 KD/15, 0 KOs) against Urbina's entries.
Path · LeBlanc
LeBlanc has to stuff the first takedown (59 TD-reaction), keep this standing, and hunt a pocket that grades 73 on defense. Wrestling is the death lane.
Path · Urbina
Urbina has to wrestle early, chain the second shot, and make LeBlanc defend the neck instead of throwing. That is the percentage path.
This is a firm lean, not a lock. The upset script is LeBlanc attacking counter punching with durability.
Style and location. Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish. Urbina is built as: Volume pressure striker. LeBlanc is built as: Hybrid who can change levels — southpaw. Fight IQ delta is -4 toward LeBlanc — that is composure, win-lane diversity, and whether they solve a second problem when the first look dies.
The edges that move the number. Ground game: Urbina 57 (C) vs LeBlanc 19 (D). Urbina brings 2.7 TD/15 and 2 sub wins into LeBlanc's 85% takedown defense. Punching agility: Urbina 85 (A) vs LeBlanc 47 (D). Hand speed / output lean Urbina (6.7 SLpM at 65%). Striking defense: Urbina 73 (B) vs LeBlanc 61 (C+). Urbina absorbs 2.26/min at 55% defense; LeBlanc is a softer target at 4.01 SApM.
The finish path leans strikes (35% KO/TKO vs 29% submission). One clean read in the pocket can flip a close card. This is a firm lean, not a lock. The upset script is LeBlanc attacking counter punching with durability. These trait marks are derived from FightMetric rates, career method shares, and loaded bout rows — reaction time and agility are proxies, not stopwatch numbers. The model folds the same scores into win probability, so a hole on this card is a hole in the percentage.
Fight IQ, ground game, defense, counter punching, reaction, agility, and takedown reaction — scored from tape and folded into the win number above.
Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish.
R1
27%
R2
17%
R3
19%
Dist
36%
Most likely: Distance. Expected 9.7 minutes.
Grappler historical edge: Urbina (ground 57) into LeBlanc (TD reaction 59). Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly.
Striking differential
-2.32 vs 4.42 SLpM−SApM (recency / opp. adjusted)
Damage ratio
0.42 vs 2.96 landed/absorbed
Output (SLpM)
1.69 vs 6.68
Ground game (tape)
19 vs 57
Punching agility
Output × accuracy × age curve
Grappling composite
TD avg × acc × def + control + submission threat (adj.)
Striking defense
65% vs 55%
Pocket defense (tape)
C+ vs B
Fight IQ
C+ 68 vs C+ 64 — composure, win-lane diversity, adjustments
Counter punching
51 vs 45
Recency form
Opp.-adjusted last 0/0 UFC rows
Style interaction
Grappler historical edge: Urbina (ground 57) into LeBlanc (TD reaction 59). Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly.
Cardio proxy
Output sustainability + distance rate
Durability
0 vs 0 KO losses
Reach / length
74.0" vs 75.0"
Takedown mismatch
TD def 85% vs 74%
Age-adjusted curve
34 vs 30
Striking efficiency
67% vs 65%
Timing & reaction
Defense + absorb + knockdown timing proxy
Takedown reaction
85% vs 74% hips on the shot
Strength of schedule
Opp. quality 50 vs 50
Layoff / rust
Time since last fight
Championship / 5-round
Three-round fight
No recent UFC tape in the book.
No recent UFC tape in the book.
Sign in to request a written analyst note on this fight.