UFC Fight Night: Buckley vs. Malott · Middleweight · 3 rounds
Opening locked Aug 19, 2026 · Gilbert Urbina 90% · Decision · Distance · scored miss (Nick Galanti / Submission)
Julien LeBlanc
61.2%
Nick Galanti
38.8%
Model win probability · confidence 62%
Desk
61.2% / 38.8%
Market
15.0% / 85.0%
Moneyline
+549 / -700
Edge
+46.3% LeBlanc
Pinnacle moneyline, two-way de-vigged. Desk is well off the market on LeBlanc. Not a betting tip.
Why the model leans this way
Julien LeBlanc is the model side at 61.2% because the largest live edges sit where this fight is likely to be fought. hybrid meets hybrid. Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly. Counter punching is the clearest separator: LeBlanc 51 (C) vs Galanti 37 (D). LeBlanc's return is the live one (0.10 KD/15, 0 KOs) against Galanti's entries.
Counter punching
LeBlancLeBlanc 51 (C) vs Galanti 37 (D). LeBlanc's return is the live one (0.10 KD/15, 0 KOs) against Galanti's entries.
Takedown reaction
GalantiGalanti 69 (B) vs LeBlanc 59 (C). When the shot comes, Galanti stuffs it at 85% — LeBlanc is at 85%.
Punching agility
LeBlancLeBlanc 47 (D) vs Galanti 39 (D). Hand speed / output lean LeBlanc (1.7 SLpM at 67%).
Striking defense
LeBlancLeBlanc 61 (C+) vs Galanti 57 (C). LeBlanc absorbs 4.01/min at 65% defense; Galanti is a softer target at 4.60 SApM.
Path · LeBlanc
Volume. LeBlanc wins ugly minutes at range, clutter the center, and never give Galanti a clean reset.
Path · Galanti
Galanti wins by forcing the fight into durability and denying LeBlanc a long look at durability.
A one-score fight on the model. Any three-minute pocket explosion or a stuck takedown against the grain wipes a lot of this number.
Style and location. The fight should spend most of its minutes at range. LeBlanc is built as: Hybrid who can change levels — southpaw. Galanti is built as: Hybrid who can change levels. Fight IQ delta is -2 toward Galanti — that is composure, win-lane diversity, and whether they solve a second problem when the first look dies.
The edges that move the number. Counter punching: LeBlanc 51 (C) vs Galanti 37 (D). LeBlanc's return is the live one (0.10 KD/15, 0 KOs) against Galanti's entries. Takedown reaction: Galanti 69 (B) vs LeBlanc 59 (C). When the shot comes, Galanti stuffs it at 85% — LeBlanc is at 85%. Punching agility: LeBlanc 47 (D) vs Galanti 39 (D). Hand speed / output lean LeBlanc (1.7 SLpM at 67%).
The clock is live — decision is the modal ending (53%). Minutes and control matter more than a single shot. A one-score fight on the model. Any three-minute pocket explosion or a stuck takedown against the grain wipes a lot of this number. These trait marks are derived from FightMetric rates, career method shares, and loaded bout rows — reaction time and agility are proxies, not stopwatch numbers. The model folds the same scores into win probability, so a hole on this card is a hole in the percentage.
Fight IQ, ground game, defense, counter punching, reaction, agility, and takedown reaction — scored from tape and folded into the win number above.
The fight should spend most of its minutes at range.
R1
19%
R2
13%
R3
15%
Dist
53%
Most likely: Distance. Expected 11.3 minutes.
hybrid meets hybrid. Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly.
Striking efficiency
67% vs 22%
Striking differential
-2.32 vs -3.80 SLpM−SApM (recency / opp. adjusted)
Recency form
Opp.-adjusted last 0/6 UFC rows
Damage ratio
0.42 vs 0.14 landed/absorbed
Counter punching
51 vs 37
Output (SLpM)
1.69 vs 0.60
Takedown reaction
85% vs 85% hips on the shot
Striking defense
65% vs 70%
Cardio proxy
Output sustainability + distance rate
Punching agility
Output × accuracy × age curve
Fight IQ
C+ 68 vs B 70 — composure, win-lane diversity, adjustments
Pocket defense (tape)
C+ vs C
Age-adjusted curve
34 vs 28
Ground game (tape)
19 vs 21
Timing & reaction
Defense + absorb + knockdown timing proxy
Durability
0 vs 0 KO losses
Style interaction
hybrid meets hybrid. Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly.
Grappling composite
TD avg × acc × def + control + submission threat (adj.)
Strength of schedule
Opp. quality 50 vs 49
Layoff / rust
Time since last fight
Takedown mismatch
TD def 85% vs 87%
Reach / length
74.0" vs 74.0"
Championship / 5-round
Three-round fight
No recent UFC tape in the book.
Fighter 5365551
Decision - Unanimous · R5 5:00
Fighter 5365550
Submission (Rear Naked Choke) · R1 1:11
Fighter 4697154
KO/TKO · R3 4:03
Fighter 3016619
Submission (Guillotine) · R1 1:59
Fighter 5125276
Submission (Guillotine) · R2 4:47
Brandon Holmes
Decision - Unanimous · R3 5:00
Sign in to request a written analyst note on this fight.