UFC 333: Volkanovski vs. Evloev · Featherweight · 5 rounds
Opening locked Aug 19, 2026 · Movsar Evloev 56% · Decision · Distance · waiting on the result

AustraliaAlexander Volkanovski
“The Great”
Champion · 28-4 · striker · Orthodox · 37 · IQ B+ 79
City Kickboxing · Australia
Alexander Volkanovski
44.2%
Movsar Evloev
55.8%
Model win probability · confidence 57%
No market posted yet.
Why the model leans this way
Movsar Evloev is the model side at 55.8% because the largest live edges sit where this fight is likely to be fought. Grappler historical edge: Evloev (ground 69) into Volkanovski (TD reaction 47). Ground game is the clearest separator: Evloev 69 (B) vs Volkanovski 35 (D). Evloev brings 4.8 TD/15 and 4 sub wins into Volkanovski's 60% takedown defense.
Ground game
EvloevEvloev 69 (B) vs Volkanovski 35 (D). Evloev brings 4.8 TD/15 and 4 sub wins into Volkanovski's 60% takedown defense.
Takedown reaction
EvloevEvloev 62 (C+) vs Volkanovski 47 (D). When the shot comes, Evloev stuffs it at 66% — Volkanovski is at 60%.
Timing & reaction
EvloevEvloev 57 (C) vs Volkanovski 43 (D). The reaction proxy — defense plus absorb plus knockdown timing — sits with Evloev.
Punching agility
VolkanovskiVolkanovski 66 (C+) vs Evloev 58 (C). Hand speed / output lean Volkanovski (6.0 SLpM at 60%).
Path · Volkanovski
Volkanovski has to stuff the first takedown (47 TD-reaction), keep this standing, and hunt a pocket that grades 65 on defense. Wrestling is the death lane.
Path · Evloev
Evloev has to wrestle early, chain the second shot, and make Volkanovski defend the neck instead of throwing. That is the percentage path.
A one-score fight on the model. Any three-minute pocket explosion or a stuck takedown against the grain wipes a lot of this number.
Style and location. Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish. Evloev is built as: Hybrid who can change levels. Volkanovski is built as: Volume pressure striker — suspect hips against the shot. Fight IQ delta is -0 toward Volkanovski — that is composure, win-lane diversity, and whether they solve a second problem when the first look dies.
The edges that move the number. Ground game: Evloev 69 (B) vs Volkanovski 35 (D). Evloev brings 4.8 TD/15 and 4 sub wins into Volkanovski's 60% takedown defense. Takedown reaction: Evloev 62 (C+) vs Volkanovski 47 (D). When the shot comes, Evloev stuffs it at 66% — Volkanovski is at 60%. Timing & reaction: Evloev 57 (C) vs Volkanovski 43 (D). The reaction proxy — defense plus absorb plus knockdown timing — sits with Evloev.
The clock is live — decision is the modal ending (53%). Minutes and control matter more than a single shot. A one-score fight on the model. Any three-minute pocket explosion or a stuck takedown against the grain wipes a lot of this number. These trait marks are derived from FightMetric rates, career method shares, and loaded bout rows — reaction time and agility are proxies, not stopwatch numbers. The model folds the same scores into win probability, so a hole on this card is a hole in the percentage.
Fight IQ, ground game, defense, counter punching, reaction, agility, and takedown reaction — scored from tape and folded into the win number above.
Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish.
R1
21%
R2
13%
R3
9%
R4
2%
R5
2%
Dist
53%
Most likely: Distance. Expected 16.6 minutes.
Grappler historical edge: Evloev (ground 69) into Volkanovski (TD reaction 47).
Ground game (tape)
35 vs 69
Striking differential
2.11 vs 0.68 SLpM−SApM (recency / opp. adjusted)
Grappling composite
TD avg × acc × def + control + submission threat (adj.)
Damage ratio
1.72 vs 1.21 landed/absorbed
Takedown reaction
60% vs 66% hips on the shot
Striking defense
53% vs 60%
Output (SLpM)
5.02 vs 3.91
Cardio proxy
Output sustainability + distance rate
Takedown mismatch
TD def 61% vs 66%
Timing & reaction
Defense + absorb + knockdown timing proxy
Style interaction
Grappler historical edge: Evloev (ground 69) into Volkanovski (TD reaction 47).
Strength of schedule
Opp. quality 68 vs 50
Age-adjusted curve
37 vs 32
Punching agility
Output × accuracy × age curve
Pocket defense (tape)
C vs C+
Recency form
Opp.-adjusted last 7/0 UFC rows
Striking efficiency
59% vs 62%
Counter punching
47 vs 51
Reach / length
71.5" vs 72.5"
Durability
0 vs 0 KO losses
Championship / 5-round
Five-round experience matters
Fight IQ
B+ 79 vs B+ 79 — composure, win-lane diversity, adjustments
Layoff / rust
Time since last fight
Fighter 4881999
Decision - Unanimous · R5 5:00
Fighter 4881999
Decision - Unanimous · R5 5:00
Fighter 4350812
KO/TKO · R2 3:32
Islam Makhachev
KO/TKO · R1 3:06
Yair Rodriguez
KO/TKO · R3 4:19
Islam Makhachev
Decision - Unanimous · R5 5:00
Brian Ortega
Decision - Unanimous · R5 5:00
No recent UFC tape in the book.
Sign in to request a written analyst note on this fight.