UFC Fight Night: Hernandez vs. Rodrigues · Featherweight · 3 rounds
Opening locked Aug 19, 2026 · Lerryan Douglas 81% · Decision · Distance · scored miss (Jamall Emmers / KO/TKO)
Jamall Emmers
18.6%
Lerryan Douglas
81.4%
Model win probability · confidence 86%
Desk
18.6% / 81.4%
Market
23.4% / 76.6%
Moneyline
+315 / -372
Edge
−4.8% Douglas
Pinnacle moneyline, two-way de-vigged. Desk leans off the market on Douglas. Not a betting tip.
Why the model leans this way
Lerryan Douglas is the model side at 81.4% because the largest live edges sit where this fight is likely to be fought. Grappler historical edge: Emmers (ground 50) into Douglas (TD reaction 57). Timing & reaction is the clearest separator: Douglas 67 (C+) vs Emmers 30 (D). The reaction proxy — defense plus absorb plus knockdown timing — sits with Douglas.
Timing & reaction
DouglasDouglas 67 (C+) vs Emmers 30 (D). The reaction proxy — defense plus absorb plus knockdown timing — sits with Douglas.
Punching agility
DouglasDouglas 85 (A) vs Emmers 49 (D). Hand speed / output lean Douglas (8.7 SLpM at 66%).
Ground game
EmmersEmmers 50 (C) vs Douglas 16 (D). Emmers brings 2.6 TD/15 and 3 sub wins into Douglas's 85% takedown defense.
Takedown reaction
DouglasDouglas 57 (C) vs Emmers 29 (D). When the shot comes, Douglas stuffs it at 85% — Emmers is at 0%.
Path · Emmers
Emmers has to wrestle early, chain the second shot, and make Douglas defend the neck instead of throwing. It is the only reliable flip if the pocket goes cold.
Path · Douglas
Douglas has to stuff the first takedown (57 TD-reaction), keep this standing, and hunt a pocket that grades 48 on defense. Wrestling is the death lane.
This is a firm lean, not a lock. The upset script is Emmers attacking ground game with durability.
Style and location. Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish. Douglas is built as: Volume pressure striker. Emmers is built as: Pocket striker — suspect hips against the shot, porous pocket. Fight IQ delta is +11 toward Douglas — that is composure, win-lane diversity, and whether they solve a second problem when the first look dies.
The edges that move the number. Timing & reaction: Douglas 67 (C+) vs Emmers 30 (D). The reaction proxy — defense plus absorb plus knockdown timing — sits with Douglas. Punching agility: Douglas 85 (A) vs Emmers 49 (D). Hand speed / output lean Douglas (8.7 SLpM at 66%). Ground game: Emmers 50 (C) vs Douglas 16 (D). Emmers brings 2.6 TD/15 and 3 sub wins into Douglas's 85% takedown defense.
The finish path leans strikes (28% KO/TKO vs 25% submission). One clean read in the pocket can flip a close card. This is a firm lean, not a lock. The upset script is Emmers attacking ground game with durability. These trait marks are derived from FightMetric rates, career method shares, and loaded bout rows — reaction time and agility are proxies, not stopwatch numbers. The model folds the same scores into win probability, so a hole on this card is a hole in the percentage.
Fight IQ, ground game, defense, counter punching, reaction, agility, and takedown reaction — scored from tape and folded into the win number above.
Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish.
R1
24%
R2
15%
R3
15%
Dist
46%
Most likely: Distance. Expected 10.5 minutes.
Grappler historical edge: Emmers (ground 50) into Douglas (TD reaction 57).
Damage ratio
1.69 vs 4.74 landed/absorbed
Striking differential
2.63 vs 4.94 SLpM−SApM (recency / opp. adjusted)
Ground game (tape)
50 vs 16
Takedown reaction
0% vs 85% hips on the shot
Timing & reaction
Defense + absorb + knockdown timing proxy
Punching agility
Output × accuracy × age curve
Pocket defense (tape)
D vs B
Fight IQ
C 58 vs B 69 — composure, win-lane diversity, adjustments
Recency form
Opp.-adjusted last 6/6 UFC rows
Striking efficiency
50% vs 64%
Counter punching
34 vs 44
Grappling composite
TD avg × acc × def + control + submission threat (adj.)
Durability
0 vs 0 KO losses
Style interaction
Grappler historical edge: Emmers (ground 50) into Douglas (TD reaction 57).
Age-adjusted curve
37 vs 31
Reach / length
74.0" vs 72.0"
Strength of schedule
Opp. quality 58 vs 50
Striking defense
51% vs 53%
Takedown mismatch
TD def 35% vs 88%
Cardio proxy
Output sustainability + distance rate
Output (SLpM)
6.45 vs 6.27
Layoff / rust
Time since last fight
Championship / 5-round
Three-round fight
Fighter 5027356
Decision - Unanimous · R3 5:00
Fighter 2558526
KO/TKO · R1 4:06
Fighter 3821549
KO/TKO · R1 4:43
Fighter 4686735
KO/TKO · R1 0:49
Jack Jenkins
Decision - Split · R3 5:00
Fighter 4218576
Decision - Unanimous · R3 5:00
Fighter 3955577
KO/TKO · R1 3:33
Fighter 5222338
KO/TKO · R1 0:36
Fighter 4424219
TKO (Punches) · R2 2:35
Fighter 4687104
KO/TKO · R2 2:56
Fighter 4781801
KO/TKO · R2 0:45
Fighter 5125478
KO/TKO · R1 1:38
Sign in to request a written analyst note on this fight.