Dana White's Contender Series: Season 10, Week 4 · Middleweight · 3 rounds

USABrandon Holmes
Unranked · 6-1 · striker · Orthodox · 29 · IQ C+ 62
TNT Martial Arts & Fitness · USA
BrazilModestino Rodrigues
“The Slenderman”
Unranked · 7-1 · hybrid · -- · 22 · IQ C+ 64
Revira Black Team · Brazil
Brandon Holmes
82.2%
Modestino Rodrigues
17.8%
Model win probability · confidence 86%
No market posted yet.
Why the model leans this way
Brandon Holmes is the model side at 82.2% because the largest live edges sit where this fight is likely to be fought. striker meets hybrid. Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly. Punching agility is the clearest separator: Holmes 53 (C) vs Rodrigues 38 (D). Hand speed / output lean Holmes (4.7 SLpM at 45%).
Punching agility
HolmesHolmes 53 (C) vs Rodrigues 38 (D). Hand speed / output lean Holmes (4.7 SLpM at 45%).
Durability
HolmesHolmes 87 (A) vs Rodrigues 74 (B). Holmes has been finished by strikes 0 times; Rodrigues 0.
Striking defense
HolmesHolmes 64 (C+) vs Rodrigues 55 (C). Holmes absorbs 2.95/min at 59% defense; Rodrigues is a softer target at 4.60 SApM.
Timing & reaction
HolmesHolmes 65 (C+) vs Rodrigues 58 (C). The reaction proxy — defense plus absorb plus knockdown timing — sits with Holmes.
Path · Holmes
Volume. Holmes wins ugly minutes at range, clutter the center, and never give Rodrigues a clean reset.
Path · Rodrigues
Rodrigues wins by forcing the fight into durability and denying Holmes a long look at durability.
This is a firm lean, not a lock. The upset script is Rodrigues attacking ground game with durability.
Style and location. The fight should spend most of its minutes at range. Holmes is built as: Pocket striker. Rodrigues is built as: Hybrid who can change levels. Fight IQ delta is -2 toward Rodrigues — that is composure, win-lane diversity, and whether they solve a second problem when the first look dies.
The edges that move the number. Punching agility: Holmes 53 (C) vs Rodrigues 38 (D). Hand speed / output lean Holmes (4.7 SLpM at 45%). Durability: Holmes 87 (A) vs Rodrigues 74 (B). Holmes has been finished by strikes 0 times; Rodrigues 0. Striking defense: Holmes 64 (C+) vs Rodrigues 55 (C). Holmes absorbs 2.95/min at 59% defense; Rodrigues is a softer target at 4.60 SApM.
The clock is live — decision is the modal ending (68%). Minutes and control matter more than a single shot. This is a firm lean, not a lock. The upset script is Rodrigues attacking ground game with durability. These trait marks are derived from FightMetric rates, career method shares, and loaded bout rows — reaction time and agility are proxies, not stopwatch numbers. The model folds the same scores into win probability, so a hole on this card is a hole in the percentage.
Fight IQ, ground game, defense, counter punching, reaction, agility, and takedown reaction — scored from tape and folded into the win number above.
The fight should spend most of its minutes at range.
R1
12%
R2
9%
R3
10%
Dist
68%
Most likely: Distance. Expected 12.5 minutes.
striker meets hybrid. Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly.
Striking differential
1.91 vs -3.81 SLpM−SApM (recency / opp. adjusted)
Damage ratio
1.67 vs 0.14 landed/absorbed
Output (SLpM)
4.73 vs 0.60
Striking efficiency
45% vs 22%
Striking defense
60% vs 69%
Cardio proxy
Output sustainability + distance rate
Punching agility
Output × accuracy × age curve
Recency form
Opp.-adjusted last 6/6 UFC rows
Durability
0 vs 0 KO losses
Pocket defense (tape)
C+ vs C
Timing & reaction
Defense + absorb + knockdown timing proxy
Fight IQ
C+ 62 vs C+ 64 — composure, win-lane diversity, adjustments
Counter punching
34 vs 37
Strength of schedule
Opp. quality 55 vs 48
Reach / length
74.0" vs 75.0"
Age-adjusted curve
29 vs 22
Layoff / rust
Time since last fight
Style interaction
striker meets hybrid. Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly.
Grappling composite
TD avg × acc × def + control + submission threat (adj.)
Takedown mismatch
TD def 86% vs 87%
Championship / 5-round
Three-round fight
Ground game (tape)
12 vs 12
Takedown reaction
85% vs 85% hips on the shot
Fighter 5350158
KO/TKO · R1 3:13
Fighter 4694832
KO/TKO · R1 2:58
Fighter 5078230
KO/TKO · R3 4:58
Nick Galanti
Decision - Unanimous · R3 5:00
Fighter 5296769
KO/TKO · R1 1:13
Fighter 5296768
Decision - Unanimous · R3 5:00
Fighter 5369638
KO/TKO · R2 1:09
Fighter 5369636
KO/TKO · R1 1:05
Fighter 5320396
KO/TKO · R1 1:06
Fighter 4348609
KO/TKO · R2 0:32
Fighter 5369635
KO/TKO · R1 1:00
Fighter 4423433
KO/TKO · R1 0:27
Sign in to request a written analyst note on this fight.