UFC 332 · Middleweight · 3 rounds
Opening locked Aug 19, 2026 · Ateba Gautier 54% · KO/TKO · Round 1 · waiting on the result

CameroonAteba Gautier
“The Storm”
Unranked · 11-1 · striker · Switch · 24 · IQ C+ 63
Manchester Top Team · Cameroon
Ateba Gautier
54.1%
Roman Kopylov
45.9%
Model win probability · confidence 47%
No market posted yet.
Why the model leans this way
Ateba Gautier is the model side at 54.1% because the largest live edges sit where this fight is likely to be fought. Striker vs striker. The pocket and the counter become the whole fight. Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly. Takedown reaction is the clearest separator: Gautier 68 (B) vs Kopylov 55 (C). When the shot comes, Gautier stuffs it at 83% — Kopylov is at 81%.
Takedown reaction
GautierGautier 68 (B) vs Kopylov 55 (C). When the shot comes, Gautier stuffs it at 83% — Kopylov is at 81%.
Fight IQ
GautierGautier 63 (C+) vs Kopylov 54 (C). Problem-solving and win-lane diversity sit with Gautier (C+ vs C).
Timing & reaction
GautierGautier 72 (B) vs Kopylov 67 (C+). The reaction proxy — defense plus absorb plus knockdown timing — sits with Gautier.
Counter punching
GautierGautier 55 (C) vs Kopylov 50 (C). Gautier's return is the live one (1.17 KD/15, 0 KOs) against Kopylov's entries.
Path · Gautier
Gautier wins by forcing the fight into durability and denying Kopylov a long look at durability.
Path · Kopylov
Kopylov wins by forcing the fight into durability and denying Gautier a long look at durability.
A one-score fight on the model. Any three-minute pocket explosion or a stuck takedown against the grain wipes a lot of this number.
Style and location. Almost exclusively standing. Power and volume decide it. Gautier is built as: Pocket striker. Kopylov is built as: Pocket striker — southpaw. Fight IQ delta is +9 toward Gautier — that is composure, win-lane diversity, and whether they solve a second problem when the first look dies.
The edges that move the number. Takedown reaction: Gautier 68 (B) vs Kopylov 55 (C). When the shot comes, Gautier stuffs it at 83% — Kopylov is at 81%. Fight IQ: Gautier 63 (C+) vs Kopylov 54 (C). Problem-solving and win-lane diversity sit with Gautier (C+ vs C). Timing & reaction: Gautier 72 (B) vs Kopylov 67 (C+). The reaction proxy — defense plus absorb plus knockdown timing — sits with Gautier.
The finish path leans strikes (60% KO/TKO vs 13% submission). One clean read in the pocket can flip a close card. A one-score fight on the model. Any three-minute pocket explosion or a stuck takedown against the grain wipes a lot of this number. These trait marks are derived from FightMetric rates, career method shares, and loaded bout rows — reaction time and agility are proxies, not stopwatch numbers. The model folds the same scores into win probability, so a hole on this card is a hole in the percentage.
Fight IQ, ground game, defense, counter punching, reaction, agility, and takedown reaction — scored from tape and folded into the win number above.
Almost exclusively standing. Power and volume decide it.
R1
38%
R2
19%
R3
16%
Dist
27%
Most likely: Round 1. Expected 8.4 minutes.
Striker vs striker. The pocket and the counter become the whole fight. Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly.
Fight IQ
C+ 63 vs C 54 — composure, win-lane diversity, adjustments
Takedown reaction
83% vs 81% hips on the shot
Reach / length
81.0" vs 75.0"
Striking differential
1.23 vs 1.53 SLpM−SApM (recency / opp. adjusted)
Recency form
Opp.-adjusted last 0/0 UFC rows
Age-adjusted curve
24 vs 34
Damage ratio
1.40 vs 1.51 landed/absorbed
Counter punching
55 vs 50
Striking efficiency
49% vs 52%
Timing & reaction
Defense + absorb + knockdown timing proxy
Ground game (tape)
28 vs 30
Grappling composite
TD avg × acc × def + control + submission threat (adj.)
Output (SLpM)
4.32 vs 4.54
Style interaction
Striker vs striker. The pocket and the counter become the whole fight. Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly.
Striking defense
59% vs 59%
Pocket defense (tape)
C+ vs C+
Takedown mismatch
TD def 83% vs 81%
Punching agility
Output × accuracy × age curve
Cardio proxy
Output sustainability + distance rate
Strength of schedule
Opp. quality 50 vs 50
Layoff / rust
Time since last fight
Championship / 5-round
Three-round fight
Durability
0 vs 0 KO losses
No recent UFC tape in the book.
No recent UFC tape in the book.
Sign in to request a written analyst note on this fight.