UFC Fight Night: Hooker vs. Parnasse · Featherweight · 3 rounds

Opening locked Aug 19, 2026 · Felipe Lima 73% · Decision · Distance · waiting on the result

Morgan Charrière vs Felipe Lima

Morgan Charrière
FranceFrance

Morgan Charrière

The Last Pirate

Unranked · 21-12-1 · striker · Orthodox · 30 · IQ C 58

Team Chapa Quente · France

VS
Felipe Lima
BrazilBrazil

Felipe Lima

Jungle Boy

Unranked · 14-2 · hybrid · Orthodox · 28 · IQ B 69

Allstars Training Center · Brazil

Morgan Charrière

26.6%

Felipe Lima

73.4%

Model win probability · confidence 84%

No market posted yet.

Why the model leans this way

Lima 73 — the tape favors hybrid who can change levels

Felipe Lima is the model side at 73.4% because the largest live edges sit where this fight is likely to be fought. striker meets hybrid. Striking defense is the clearest separator: Lima 79 (B+) vs Charrière 32 (D). Lima absorbs 2.00/min at 65% defense; Charrière is a softer target at 4.80 SApM.

  1. 01

    Striking defense

    Lima

    Lima 79 (B+) vs Charrière 32 (D). Lima absorbs 2.00/min at 65% defense; Charrière is a softer target at 4.80 SApM.

  2. 02

    Timing & reaction

    Lima

    Lima 72 (B) vs Charrière 36 (D). The reaction proxy — defense plus absorb plus knockdown timing — sits with Lima.

  3. 03

    Durability

    Lima

    Lima 91 (A+) vs Charrière 76 (B+). Lima has been finished by strikes 0 times; Charrière 0.

  4. 04

    Fight IQ

    Lima

    Lima 69 (B) vs Charrière 58 (C). Problem-solving and win-lane diversity sit with Lima (B vs C).

Path · Charrière

Charrière wins by forcing the fight into durability and denying Lima a long look at durability.

Path · Lima

Lima wins by forcing the fight into durability and denying Charrière a long look at durability.

This is a firm lean, not a lock. The upset script is Charrière attacking counter punching with durability.

Full read

Style and location. The fight should spend most of its minutes at range. Lima is built as: Hybrid who can change levels. Charrière is built as: Pocket striker — porous pocket. Fight IQ delta is +11 toward Lima — that is composure, win-lane diversity, and whether they solve a second problem when the first look dies.

The edges that move the number. Striking defense: Lima 79 (B+) vs Charrière 32 (D). Lima absorbs 2.00/min at 65% defense; Charrière is a softer target at 4.80 SApM. Timing & reaction: Lima 72 (B) vs Charrière 36 (D). The reaction proxy — defense plus absorb plus knockdown timing — sits with Lima. Durability: Lima 91 (A+) vs Charrière 76 (B+). Lima has been finished by strikes 0 times; Charrière 0.

The clock is live — decision is the modal ending (61%). Minutes and control matter more than a single shot. This is a firm lean, not a lock. The upset script is Charrière attacking counter punching with durability. These trait marks are derived from FightMetric rates, career method shares, and loaded bout rows — reaction time and agility are proxies, not stopwatch numbers. The model folds the same scores into win probability, so a hole on this card is a hole in the percentage.

Style & IQ board

Fight IQ, ground game, defense, counter punching, reaction, agility, and takedown reaction — scored from tape and folded into the win number above.

CharrièreTraitLima
58 C
IQ
69 B
44 D
Ground
48 D
32 D
Defense
79 B+
40 D
Counter
41 D
36 D
Reaction
72 B
48 D
Agility
51 C
63 C+
TD react
56 C
76 B+
Chin
91 A+

Method of victory

KO / TKO
22%
Submission
17%
Decision
61%

The fight should spend most of its minutes at range.

Duration

R1

16%

R2

11%

R3

12%

Dist

61%

Most likely: Distance. Expected 11.8 minutes.

Style matchup

striker meets hybrid.

  • Striking defense

    39% vs 66%

    Lima
  • Striking differential

    -1.05 vs 0.34 SLpM−SApM (recency / opp. adjusted)

    Lima
  • Pocket defense (tape)

    D vs B+

    Lima
  • Timing & reaction

    Defense + absorb + knockdown timing proxy

    Lima
  • Fight IQ

    C 58 vs B 69 — composure, win-lane diversity, adjustments

    Lima
  • Recency form

    Opp.-adjusted last 6/6 UFC rows

    Lima
  • Damage ratio

    0.78 vs 1.18 landed/absorbed

    Lima
  • Output (SLpM)

    3.78 vs 2.24

    Charrière
  • Durability

    0 vs 0 KO losses

    Lima
  • Cardio proxy

    Output sustainability + distance rate

    Lima
  • Takedown reaction

    77% vs 80% hips on the shot

    Charrière
  • Striking efficiency

    51% vs 47%

    Charrière
  • Ground game (tape)

    44 vs 48

    Lima
  • Grappling composite

    TD avg × acc × def + control + submission threat (adj.)

    Lima
  • Strength of schedule

    Opp. quality 54 vs 60

    Lima
  • Punching agility

    Output × accuracy × age curve

    Lima
  • Reach / length

    69.0" vs 68.0"

    Charrière
  • Age-adjusted curve

    30 vs 28

    Lima
  • Counter punching

    40 vs 41

    Lima
  • Takedown mismatch

    TD def 76% vs 81%

    Lima
  • Layoff / rust

    Time since last fight

    Charrière
  • Style interaction

    striker meets hybrid.

    Charrière
  • Championship / 5-round

    Three-round fight

    Charrière

Tape

CharrièreMetricLima
4.02SLpM2.86
4.80SApM2.00
55%Str Acc52%
40%Str Def65%
2.06TD Avg2.18
47%TD Acc27%
77%TD Def80%
0.29Sub Avg0.73
0.00KD/150.00
5'9"Reach5'8"
30Age28

Morgan Charrière

L

Fighter 4425763

KO/TKO · R1 1:14

Dec 14, 2025
W

Fighter 3821549

KO/TKO · R3 0:27

Jul 13, 2025
L

Nathaniel Wood

Decision - Unanimous · R3 5:00

Mar 22, 2025
W

Fighter 2558526

KO/TKO · R2 0:27

Sep 28, 2024
L

Fighter 4040926

Decision - Split · R3 5:00

Apr 6, 2024
W

Fighter 5157247

KO/TKO · R1 3:51

Sep 2, 2023

Felipe Lima

L

Fighter 5144008

Decision - Unanimous · R3 5:00

Jun 29, 2025
W

Fighter 4010864

Decision - Unanimous · R3 5:00

Dec 15, 2024
W

Muhammad Naimov

Submission · R3 1:15

Jun 22, 2024
W

Fighter 4291016

Decision - Unanimous · R5 5:00

Jul 28, 2023
W

Fighter 3925492

KO (Knee) · R1 -

Nov 20, 2021
W

Fighter 4907664

Decision - Unanimous · R3 5:00

Mar 6, 2021

Your pick

Desk briefing

Sign in to request a written analyst note on this fight.