UFC Fight Night: Ankalaev vs. Guskov · Bantamweight · 3 rounds
Opening locked Aug 19, 2026 · Cody Gibson 84% · Decision · Distance · scored miss (Abdul Hussein / Submission)
Cody Gibson
84.4%
Abdul Hussein
15.6%
Model win probability · confidence 82%
No market posted yet.
Why the model leans this way
Cody Gibson is the model side at 84.4% because the largest live edges sit where this fight is likely to be fought. Grappler historical edge: Gibson (ground 53) into Hussein (TD reaction 55). Ground game is the clearest separator: Gibson 53 (C) vs Hussein 21 (D). Gibson brings 2.0 TD/15 and 6 sub wins into Hussein's 85% takedown defense.
Ground game
GibsonGibson 53 (C) vs Hussein 21 (D). Gibson brings 2.0 TD/15 and 6 sub wins into Hussein's 85% takedown defense.
Durability
GibsonGibson 85 (A) vs Hussein 74 (B). Gibson has been finished by strikes 0 times; Hussein 0.
Striking defense
GibsonGibson 64 (C+) vs Hussein 57 (C). Gibson absorbs 3.34/min at 61% defense; Hussein is a softer target at 4.60 SApM.
Counter punching
GibsonGibson 44 (D) vs Hussein 37 (D). Gibson's return is the live one (0.10 KD/15, 0 KOs) against Hussein's entries.
Path · Gibson
Gibson has to wrestle early, chain the second shot, and make Hussein defend the neck instead of throwing. That is the percentage path.
Path · Hussein
Hussein has to stuff the first takedown (55 TD-reaction), keep this standing, and hunt a pocket that grades 64 on defense. Wrestling is the death lane.
This is a firm lean, not a lock. The upset script is Hussein attacking punching agility with durability.
Style and location. Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish. Gibson is built as: Hybrid who can change levels — suspect hips against the shot. Hussein is built as: Hybrid who can change levels. Fight IQ delta is -6 toward Hussein — that is composure, win-lane diversity, and whether they solve a second problem when the first look dies.
The edges that move the number. Ground game: Gibson 53 (C) vs Hussein 21 (D). Gibson brings 2.0 TD/15 and 6 sub wins into Hussein's 85% takedown defense. Durability: Gibson 85 (A) vs Hussein 74 (B). Gibson has been finished by strikes 0 times; Hussein 0. Striking defense: Gibson 64 (C+) vs Hussein 57 (C). Gibson absorbs 3.34/min at 61% defense; Hussein is a softer target at 4.60 SApM.
The finish path leans the mat (35% submission). Once a takedown sticks, the neck becomes the whole fight. This is a firm lean, not a lock. The upset script is Hussein attacking punching agility with durability. These trait marks are derived from FightMetric rates, career method shares, and loaded bout rows — reaction time and agility are proxies, not stopwatch numbers. The model folds the same scores into win probability, so a hole on this card is a hole in the percentage.
Fight IQ, ground game, defense, counter punching, reaction, agility, and takedown reaction — scored from tape and folded into the win number above.
Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish.
R1
22%
R2
15%
R3
18%
Dist
44%
Most likely: Distance. Expected 10.6 minutes.
Grappler historical edge: Gibson (ground 53) into Hussein (TD reaction 55).
Striking differential
0.25 vs -4.60 SLpM−SApM (recency / opp. adjusted)
Striking efficiency
52% vs 0%
Damage ratio
1.07 vs 0.00 landed/absorbed
Ground game (tape)
53 vs 21
Output (SLpM)
3.59 vs 0.00
Grappling composite
TD avg × acc × def + control + submission threat (adj.)
Striking defense
61% vs 68%
Fight IQ
C 54 vs C 59 — composure, win-lane diversity, adjustments
Reach / length
71.0" vs 67.0"
Recency form
Opp.-adjusted last 0/0 UFC rows
Durability
0 vs 0 KO losses
Pocket defense (tape)
C+ vs C
Style interaction
Grappler historical edge: Gibson (ground 53) into Hussein (TD reaction 55).
Counter punching
44 vs 37
Age-adjusted curve
38 vs 29
Punching agility
Output × accuracy × age curve
Takedown reaction
77% vs 85% hips on the shot
Cardio proxy
Output sustainability + distance rate
Timing & reaction
Defense + absorb + knockdown timing proxy
Takedown mismatch
TD def 77% vs 85%
Strength of schedule
Opp. quality 50 vs 50
Layoff / rust
Time since last fight
Championship / 5-round
Three-round fight
No recent UFC tape in the book.
No recent UFC tape in the book.
Sign in to request a written analyst note on this fight.