Noche UFC: Rodriguez vs. Silva · Heavyweight · 3 rounds
Opening locked Aug 19, 2026 · Curtis Blaydes 63% · KO/TKO · Distance · waiting on the result

Dominican RepublicWaldo Cortes Acosta
“Salsa Boy”
Unranked · 17-3 · striker · Orthodox · 34 · IQ C+ 67
UKF Gym · Dominican Republic
Waldo Cortes Acosta
36.9%
Curtis Blaydes
63.1%
Model win probability · confidence 75%
No market posted yet.
Why the model leans this way
Curtis Blaydes is the model side at 63.1% because the largest live edges sit where this fight is likely to be fought. Grappler historical edge: Blaydes (ground 62) into Acosta (TD reaction 62). Ground game is the clearest separator: Blaydes 62 (C+) vs Cortes Acosta 27 (D). Blaydes brings 5.1 TD/15 and 0 sub wins into Cortes Acosta's 78% takedown defense.
Ground game
BlaydesBlaydes 62 (C+) vs Cortes Acosta 27 (D). Blaydes brings 5.1 TD/15 and 0 sub wins into Cortes Acosta's 78% takedown defense.
Counter punching
BlaydesBlaydes 74 (B) vs Cortes Acosta 67 (C+). Blaydes's return is the live one (0.75 KD/15, 10 KOs) against Cortes Acosta's entries.
Timing & reaction
AcostaCortes Acosta 67 (C+) vs Blaydes 60 (C+). The reaction proxy — defense plus absorb plus knockdown timing — sits with Cortes Acosta.
Punching agility
AcostaCortes Acosta 69 (B) vs Blaydes 65 (C+). Hand speed / output lean Cortes Acosta (5.3 SLpM at 51%).
Path · Acosta
Cortes Acosta has to stuff the first takedown (62 TD-reaction), keep this standing, and hunt a pocket that grades 63 on defense. Wrestling is the death lane.
Path · Blaydes
Blaydes has to wrestle early, chain the second shot, and make Cortes Acosta defend the neck instead of throwing. That is the percentage path.
A one-score fight on the model. Any three-minute pocket explosion or a stuck takedown against the grain wipes a lot of this number.
Style and location. Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish. Blaydes is built as: Hybrid who can change levels. Cortes Acosta is built as: Power striker. Fight IQ delta is +2 toward Blaydes — that is composure, win-lane diversity, and whether they solve a second problem when the first look dies.
The edges that move the number. Ground game: Blaydes 62 (C+) vs Cortes Acosta 27 (D). Blaydes brings 5.1 TD/15 and 0 sub wins into Cortes Acosta's 78% takedown defense. Counter punching: Blaydes 74 (B) vs Cortes Acosta 67 (C+). Blaydes's return is the live one (0.75 KD/15, 10 KOs) against Cortes Acosta's entries. Timing & reaction: Cortes Acosta 67 (C+) vs Blaydes 60 (C+). The reaction proxy — defense plus absorb plus knockdown timing — sits with Cortes Acosta.
The finish path leans strikes (49% KO/TKO vs 14% submission). One clean read in the pocket can flip a close card. A one-score fight on the model. Any three-minute pocket explosion or a stuck takedown against the grain wipes a lot of this number. These trait marks are derived from FightMetric rates, career method shares, and loaded bout rows — reaction time and agility are proxies, not stopwatch numbers. The model folds the same scores into win probability, so a hole on this card is a hole in the percentage.
Fight IQ, ground game, defense, counter punching, reaction, agility, and takedown reaction — scored from tape and folded into the win number above.
Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish.
R1
33%
R2
15%
R3
16%
Dist
37%
Most likely: Distance. Expected 9.3 minutes.
Grappler historical edge: Blaydes (ground 62) into Acosta (TD reaction 62).
Ground game (tape)
27 vs 62
Striking differential
1.99 vs 2.98 SLpM−SApM (recency / opp. adjusted)
Recency form
Opp.-adjusted last 8/6 UFC rows
Grappling composite
TD avg × acc × def + control + submission threat (adj.)
Damage ratio
1.66 vs 1.94 landed/absorbed
Output (SLpM)
5.04 vs 6.16
Striking efficiency
49% vs 58%
Counter punching
67 vs 74
Style interaction
Grappler historical edge: Blaydes (ground 62) into Acosta (TD reaction 62).
Reach / length
78.0" vs 80.0"
Timing & reaction
Defense + absorb + knockdown timing proxy
Fight IQ
C+ 67 vs B 69 — composure, win-lane diversity, adjustments
Punching agility
Output × accuracy × age curve
Pocket defense (tape)
C+ vs C+
Durability
0 vs 0 KO losses
Striking defense
58% vs 59%
Takedown reaction
78% vs 65% hips on the shot
Cardio proxy
Output sustainability + distance rate
Strength of schedule
Opp. quality 66 vs 63
Takedown mismatch
TD def 79% vs 64%
Age-adjusted curve
34 vs 35
Layoff / rust
Time since last fight
Championship / 5-round
Three-round fight
Alexander Volkov
Decision - Unanimous · R3 5:00
Derrick Lewis
KO/TKO · R2 3:14
Shamil Gaziev
KO/TKO · R1 1:22
Fighter 3041315
KO/TKO · R1 3:59
Fighter 4217395
Decision - Unanimous · R3 5:00
Serghei Spivac
Decision - Unanimous · R3 5:00
Ryan Spann
KO/TKO · R2 4:48
Robelis Despaigne
Decision - Unanimous · R3 5:00
Fighter 4049391
Decision - Unanimous · R3 5:00
Fighter 4001837
Decision - Split · R3 5:00
Fighter 4010976
KO/TKO · R1 1:00
Fighter 4873640
KO/TKO · R2 0:36
Fighter 4217395
KO/TKO · R1 3:08
Fighter 4010976
KO/TKO · R1 0:15
Sign in to request a written analyst note on this fight.