Noche UFC: Rodriguez vs. Silva · Flyweight · 3 rounds
Opening locked Aug 19, 2026 · Tim Elliott 90% · Submission · Distance · waiting on the result
Tim Elliott
89.5%
Édgar Cháirez
10.5%
Model win probability · confidence 86%
No market posted yet.
Why the model leans this way
Tim Elliott is the model side at 89.5% because the largest live edges sit where this fight is likely to be fought. Grappler historical edge: Elliott (ground 72) into Cháirez (TD reaction 19). Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly. Striking defense is the clearest separator: Elliott 85 (A) vs Cháirez 28 (D). Elliott absorbs 2.07/min at 72% defense; Cháirez is a softer target at 7.87 SApM.
Striking defense
ElliottElliott 85 (A) vs Cháirez 28 (D). Elliott absorbs 2.07/min at 72% defense; Cháirez is a softer target at 7.87 SApM.
Timing & reaction
ElliottElliott 66 (C+) vs Cháirez 21 (D). The reaction proxy — defense plus absorb plus knockdown timing — sits with Elliott.
Takedown reaction
ElliottElliott 51 (C) vs Cháirez 19 (D). When the shot comes, Elliott stuffs it at 71% — Cháirez is at 0%.
Ground game
ElliottElliott 72 (B) vs Cháirez 41 (D). Elliott brings 3.6 TD/15 and 8 sub wins into Cháirez's 0% takedown defense.
Path · Elliott
Elliott has to wrestle early, chain the second shot, and make Cháirez defend the neck instead of throwing. That is the percentage path.
Path · Cháirez
Cháirez has to stuff the first takedown (19 TD-reaction), keep this standing, and hunt a pocket that grades 85 on defense. Wrestling is the death lane.
This is a firm lean, not a lock. The upset script is Cháirez attacking counter punching with their best weapon.
Style and location. Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish. Elliott is built as: Hybrid who can change levels — suspect hips against the shot, southpaw. Cháirez is built as: Pocket striker — suspect hips against the shot, porous pocket. Fight IQ delta is +9 toward Elliott — that is composure, win-lane diversity, and whether they solve a second problem when the first look dies.
The edges that move the number. Striking defense: Elliott 85 (A) vs Cháirez 28 (D). Elliott absorbs 2.07/min at 72% defense; Cháirez is a softer target at 7.87 SApM. Timing & reaction: Elliott 66 (C+) vs Cháirez 21 (D). The reaction proxy — defense plus absorb plus knockdown timing — sits with Elliott. Takedown reaction: Elliott 51 (C) vs Cháirez 19 (D). When the shot comes, Elliott stuffs it at 71% — Cháirez is at 0%.
The finish path leans the mat (41% submission). Once a takedown sticks, the neck becomes the whole fight. This is a firm lean, not a lock. The upset script is Cháirez attacking counter punching with their best weapon. These trait marks are derived from FightMetric rates, career method shares, and loaded bout rows — reaction time and agility are proxies, not stopwatch numbers. The model folds the same scores into win probability, so a hole on this card is a hole in the percentage.
Fight IQ, ground game, defense, counter punching, reaction, agility, and takedown reaction — scored from tape and folded into the win number above.
Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish.
R1
24%
R2
17%
R3
21%
Dist
38%
Most likely: Distance. Expected 10.1 minutes.
Grappler historical edge: Elliott (ground 72) into Cháirez (TD reaction 19). Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly.
Striking differential
1.78 vs -2.02 SLpM−SApM (recency / opp. adjusted)
Striking defense
73% vs 42%
Damage ratio
1.87 vs 0.68 landed/absorbed
Pocket defense (tape)
A vs D
Ground game (tape)
72 vs 41
Takedown reaction
71% vs 0% hips on the shot
Timing & reaction
Defense + absorb + knockdown timing proxy
Grappling composite
TD avg × acc × def + control + submission threat (adj.)
Counter punching
51 vs 31
Recency form
Opp.-adjusted last 6/6 UFC rows
Takedown mismatch
TD def 71% vs 35%
Fight IQ
C+ 62 vs C 53 — composure, win-lane diversity, adjustments
Style interaction
Grappler historical edge: Elliott (ground 72) into Cháirez (TD reaction 19). Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly.
Reach / length
66.0" vs 71.0"
Punching agility
Output × accuracy × age curve
Durability
0 vs 0 KO losses
Cardio proxy
Output sustainability + distance rate
Output (SLpM)
3.82 vs 4.38
Striking efficiency
44% vs 47%
Age-adjusted curve
39 vs 30
Strength of schedule
Opp. quality 60 vs 54
Layoff / rust
Time since last fight
Championship / 5-round
Three-round fight
Fighter 4997217
Decision - Unanimous · R3 5:00
Kai Asakura
Submission · R2 4:39
Sumudaerji
Submission · R1 4:02
Fighter 4905261
Submission · R3 3:03
Fighter 4713584
Decision - Unanimous · R3 5:00
Fighter 4294924
Decision - Unanimous · R3 5:00
Fighter 3895544
Submission · R1 4:13
Fighter 4916248
Decision - Split · R3 5:00
Fighter 4396359
Submission · R1 2:30
Joshua Van
Decision - Unanimous · R3 5:00
Fighter 4895772
Submission · R1 2:17
Fighter 4895772
No Contest · R1 3:47
Sign in to request a written analyst note on this fight.