UFC Fight Night: Buckley vs. Malott · Welterweight · 5 rounds
Opening locked Aug 19, 2026 · Mike Malott 62% · KO/TKO · Round 1 · waiting on the result
Joaquin Buckley
38.5%
Mike Malott
61.5%
Model win probability · confidence 55%
No market posted yet.
Why the model leans this way
Mike Malott is the model side at 61.5% because the largest live edges sit where this fight is likely to be fought. Grappler historical edge: Malott (ground 51) into Buckley (TD reaction 67). Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly. Ground game is the clearest separator: Malott 51 (C) vs Buckley 33 (D). Malott brings 1.6 TD/15 and 6 sub wins into Buckley's 79% takedown defense.
Ground game
MalottMalott 51 (C) vs Buckley 33 (D). Malott brings 1.6 TD/15 and 6 sub wins into Buckley's 79% takedown defense.
Fight IQ
MalottMalott 68 (B) vs Buckley 57 (C). Problem-solving and win-lane diversity sit with Malott (B vs C).
Punching agility
MalottMalott 56 (C) vs Buckley 46 (D). Hand speed / output lean Malott (4.0 SLpM at 52%).
Counter punching
MalottMalott 49 (D) vs Buckley 43 (D). Malott's return is the live one (0.49 KD/15, 0 KOs) against Buckley's entries.
Path · Buckley
Buckley has to stuff the first takedown (67 TD-reaction), keep this standing, and hunt a pocket that grades 65 on defense. Wrestling is the death lane.
Path · Malott
Malott has to wrestle early, chain the second shot, and make Buckley defend the neck instead of throwing. That is the percentage path.
A one-score fight on the model. Any three-minute pocket explosion or a stuck takedown against the grain wipes a lot of this number.
Style and location. Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish. Malott is built as: Pocket striker. Buckley is built as: Hybrid who can change levels — southpaw. Fight IQ delta is +12 toward Malott — that is composure, win-lane diversity, and whether they solve a second problem when the first look dies.
The edges that move the number. Ground game: Malott 51 (C) vs Buckley 33 (D). Malott brings 1.6 TD/15 and 6 sub wins into Buckley's 79% takedown defense. Fight IQ: Malott 68 (B) vs Buckley 57 (C). Problem-solving and win-lane diversity sit with Malott (B vs C). Punching agility: Malott 56 (C) vs Buckley 46 (D). Hand speed / output lean Malott (4.0 SLpM at 52%).
The finish path leans strikes (36% KO/TKO vs 35% submission). One clean read in the pocket can flip a close card. A one-score fight on the model. Any three-minute pocket explosion or a stuck takedown against the grain wipes a lot of this number. These trait marks are derived from FightMetric rates, career method shares, and loaded bout rows — reaction time and agility are proxies, not stopwatch numbers. The model folds the same scores into win probability, so a hole on this card is a hole in the percentage.
Fight IQ, ground game, defense, counter punching, reaction, agility, and takedown reaction — scored from tape and folded into the win number above.
Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish.
R1
33%
R2
19%
R3
14%
R4
2%
R5
3%
Dist
29%
Most likely: Round 1. Expected 12.2 minutes.
Grappler historical edge: Malott (ground 51) into Buckley (TD reaction 67). Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly.
Ground game (tape)
33 vs 51
Fight IQ
C 57 vs B 68 — composure, win-lane diversity, adjustments
Striking differential
0.29 vs 0.83 SLpM−SApM (recency / opp. adjusted)
Striking efficiency
40% vs 52%
Damage ratio
1.09 vs 1.26 landed/absorbed
Grappling composite
TD avg × acc × def + control + submission threat (adj.)
Reach / length
76.0" vs 73.0"
Punching agility
Output × accuracy × age curve
Counter punching
43 vs 49
Recency form
Opp.-adjusted last 0/0 UFC rows
Output (SLpM)
3.62 vs 4.02
Style interaction
Grappler historical edge: Malott (ground 51) into Buckley (TD reaction 67). Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly.
Durability
0 vs 0 KO losses
Timing & reaction
Defense + absorb + knockdown timing proxy
Age-adjusted curve
32 vs 34
Striking defense
61% vs 60%
Pocket defense (tape)
C+ vs C+
Takedown reaction
79% vs 78% hips on the shot
Cardio proxy
Output sustainability + distance rate
Takedown mismatch
TD def 79% vs 78%
Strength of schedule
Opp. quality 50 vs 50
Layoff / rust
Time since last fight
Championship / 5-round
Five-round experience matters
No recent UFC tape in the book.
No recent UFC tape in the book.
Sign in to request a written analyst note on this fight.