UFC Fight Night: Gamrot vs Salkilld · Women's Strawweight · 3 rounds
Opening locked Aug 19, 2026 · Alexia Thainara 74% · Submission · Distance · scored hit (Alexia Thainara / Decision - Unanimous)

BrazilAmanda Lemos
Unranked · 15-7-1 · striker · Southpaw · 39 · IQ C+ 62
Marajo Brothers Team · Brazil
Amanda Lemos
25.8%
Alexia Thainara
74.2%
Model win probability · confidence 70%
No market posted yet.
Why the model leans this way
Alexia Thainara is the model side at 74.2% because the largest live edges sit where this fight is likely to be fought. Grappler historical edge: Thainara (ground 83) into Lemos (TD reaction 59). Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly. Ground game is the clearest separator: Thainara 83 (A) vs Lemos 44 (D). Thainara brings 4.0 TD/15 and 7 sub wins into Lemos's 81% takedown defense.
Ground game
ThainaraThainara 83 (A) vs Lemos 44 (D). Thainara brings 4.0 TD/15 and 7 sub wins into Lemos's 81% takedown defense.
Punching agility
ThainaraThainara 64 (C+) vs Lemos 48 (D). Hand speed / output lean Thainara (4.8 SLpM at 59%).
Takedown reaction
LemosLemos 59 (C) vs Thainara 50 (D). When the shot comes, Lemos stuffs it at 81% — Thainara is at 69%.
Counter punching
LemosLemos 53 (C) vs Thainara 44 (D). Lemos's return is the live one (0.37 KD/15, 0 KOs) against Thainara's entries.
Path · Lemos
Lemos has to stuff the first takedown (59 TD-reaction), keep this standing, and hunt a pocket that grades 67 on defense. Wrestling is the death lane.
Path · Thainara
Thainara has to wrestle early, chain the second shot, and make Lemos defend the neck instead of throwing. That is the percentage path.
This is a firm lean, not a lock. The upset script is Lemos attacking counter punching with durability.
Style and location. Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish. Thainara is built as: Hybrid who can change levels — suspect hips against the shot. Lemos is built as: Pocket striker — southpaw. Fight IQ delta is +1 toward Thainara — that is composure, win-lane diversity, and whether they solve a second problem when the first look dies.
The edges that move the number. Ground game: Thainara 83 (A) vs Lemos 44 (D). Thainara brings 4.0 TD/15 and 7 sub wins into Lemos's 81% takedown defense. Punching agility: Thainara 64 (C+) vs Lemos 48 (D). Hand speed / output lean Thainara (4.8 SLpM at 59%). Takedown reaction: Lemos 59 (C) vs Thainara 50 (D). When the shot comes, Lemos stuffs it at 81% — Thainara is at 69%.
The finish path leans the mat (42% submission). Once a takedown sticks, the neck becomes the whole fight. This is a firm lean, not a lock. The upset script is Lemos attacking counter punching with durability. These trait marks are derived from FightMetric rates, career method shares, and loaded bout rows — reaction time and agility are proxies, not stopwatch numbers. The model folds the same scores into win probability, so a hole on this card is a hole in the percentage.
Fight IQ, ground game, defense, counter punching, reaction, agility, and takedown reaction — scored from tape and folded into the win number above.
Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish.
R1
25%
R2
16%
R3
18%
Dist
41%
Most likely: Distance. Expected 10.2 minutes.
Grappler historical edge: Thainara (ground 83) into Lemos (TD reaction 59). Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly.
Striking differential
-0.77 vs 1.88 SLpM−SApM (recency / opp. adjusted)
Ground game (tape)
44 vs 83
Damage ratio
0.79 vs 1.64 landed/absorbed
Grappling composite
TD avg × acc × def + control + submission threat (adj.)
Output (SLpM)
2.84 vs 4.80
Punching agility
Output × accuracy × age curve
Takedown reaction
81% vs 69% hips on the shot
Age-adjusted curve
39 vs 30
Recency form
Opp.-adjusted last 0/0 UFC rows
Counter punching
53 vs 44
Striking defense
62% vs 58%
Style interaction
Grappler historical edge: Thainara (ground 83) into Lemos (TD reaction 59). Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly.
Reach / length
65.0" vs 67.0"
Pocket defense (tape)
C+ vs C+
Durability
0 vs 0 KO losses
Takedown mismatch
TD def 81% vs 69%
Timing & reaction
Defense + absorb + knockdown timing proxy
Cardio proxy
Output sustainability + distance rate
Striking efficiency
60% vs 59%
Fight IQ
C+ 62 vs C+ 62 — composure, win-lane diversity, adjustments
Strength of schedule
Opp. quality 50 vs 50
Layoff / rust
Time since last fight
Championship / 5-round
Three-round fight
No recent UFC tape in the book.
No recent UFC tape in the book.
Sign in to request a written analyst note on this fight.