UFC Fight Night: Ankalaev vs. Guskov · Lightweight · 3 rounds
Opening locked Aug 19, 2026 · Magomed Zaynukov 91% · Decision · Distance · scored hit (Magomed Zaynukov / Decision - Unanimous)

RussiaMagomed Zaynukov
“Wild Chanco”
Unranked · 9-0 · striker · Orthodox · 31 · IQ B 70
Abdulmanap Nurmagomedov Martial Arts School · Russia
Magomed Zaynukov
91.0%
Damian Rzepecki
9.0%
Model win probability · confidence 86%
No market posted yet.
Why the model leans this way
Magomed Zaynukov is the model side at 91.0% because the largest live edges sit where this fight is likely to be fought. Grappler historical edge: Zaynukov (ground 42) into Rzepecki (TD reaction 69). Punching agility is the clearest separator: Zaynukov 80 (B+) vs Rzepecki 38 (D). Hand speed / output lean Zaynukov (15.7 SLpM at 62%).
Punching agility
ZaynukovZaynukov 80 (B+) vs Rzepecki 38 (D). Hand speed / output lean Zaynukov (15.7 SLpM at 62%).
Ground game
ZaynukovZaynukov 42 (D) vs Rzepecki 21 (D). Zaynukov brings 2.0 TD/15 and 0 sub wins into Rzepecki's 85% takedown defense.
Striking defense
ZaynukovZaynukov 66 (C+) vs Rzepecki 57 (C). Zaynukov absorbs 1.40/min at 42% defense; Rzepecki is a softer target at 4.60 SApM.
Counter punching
RzepeckiRzepecki 37 (D) vs Zaynukov 29 (D). Rzepecki's return is the live one (0.10 KD/15, 0 KOs) against Zaynukov's entries.
Path · Zaynukov
Zaynukov has to wrestle early, chain the second shot, and make Rzepecki defend the neck instead of throwing. That is the percentage path.
Path · Rzepecki
Rzepecki has to stuff the first takedown (69 TD-reaction), keep this standing, and hunt a pocket that grades 66 on defense. Wrestling is the death lane.
This is a firm lean, not a lock. The upset script is Rzepecki attacking counter punching with durability.
Style and location. Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish. Zaynukov is built as: Volume pressure striker. Rzepecki is built as: Hybrid who can change levels. Fight IQ delta is +0 toward Zaynukov — that is composure, win-lane diversity, and whether they solve a second problem when the first look dies.
The edges that move the number. Punching agility: Zaynukov 80 (B+) vs Rzepecki 38 (D). Hand speed / output lean Zaynukov (15.7 SLpM at 62%). Ground game: Zaynukov 42 (D) vs Rzepecki 21 (D). Zaynukov brings 2.0 TD/15 and 0 sub wins into Rzepecki's 85% takedown defense. Striking defense: Zaynukov 66 (C+) vs Rzepecki 57 (C). Zaynukov absorbs 1.40/min at 42% defense; Rzepecki is a softer target at 4.60 SApM.
The clock is live — decision is the modal ending (62%). Minutes and control matter more than a single shot. This is a firm lean, not a lock. The upset script is Rzepecki attacking counter punching with durability. These trait marks are derived from FightMetric rates, career method shares, and loaded bout rows — reaction time and agility are proxies, not stopwatch numbers. The model folds the same scores into win probability, so a hole on this card is a hole in the percentage.
Fight IQ, ground game, defense, counter punching, reaction, agility, and takedown reaction — scored from tape and folded into the win number above.
Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish.
R1
15%
R2
10%
R3
12%
Dist
62%
Most likely: Distance. Expected 12 minutes.
Grappler historical edge: Zaynukov (ground 42) into Rzepecki (TD reaction 69).
Striking differential
14.27 vs -4.60 SLpM−SApM (recency / opp. adjusted)
Damage ratio
11.19 vs 0.00 landed/absorbed
Output (SLpM)
15.67 vs 0.00
Striking efficiency
62% vs 0%
Striking defense
42% vs 68%
Ground game (tape)
42 vs 21
Punching agility
Output × accuracy × age curve
Grappling composite
TD avg × acc × def + control + submission threat (adj.)
Pocket defense (tape)
C+ vs C
Cardio proxy
Output sustainability + distance rate
Counter punching
29 vs 37
Reach / length
68.0" vs 71.0"
Style interaction
Grappler historical edge: Zaynukov (ground 42) into Rzepecki (TD reaction 69).
Durability
0 vs 0 KO losses
Timing & reaction
Defense + absorb + knockdown timing proxy
Takedown reaction
77% vs 85% hips on the shot
Recency form
Opp.-adjusted last 0/0 UFC rows
Age-adjusted curve
31 vs 24
Takedown mismatch
TD def 77% vs 85%
Fight IQ
B 70 vs B 69 — composure, win-lane diversity, adjustments
Strength of schedule
Opp. quality 50 vs 50
Layoff / rust
Time since last fight
Championship / 5-round
Three-round fight
No recent UFC tape in the book.
No recent UFC tape in the book.
Sign in to request a written analyst note on this fight.