UFC 330: Makhachev vs. Machado Garry · Middleweight · 3 rounds
Opening locked Aug 19, 2026 · Dustin Stoltzfus 55% · Submission · Round 1 · scored hit (Dustin Stoltzfus / Submission)
Mansur Abdul-Malik
45.5%
Dustin Stoltzfus
54.5%
Model win probability · confidence 47%
No market posted yet.
Why the model leans this way
Dustin Stoltzfus is the model side at 54.5% because the largest live edges sit where this fight is likely to be fought. Grappler historical edge: Stoltzfus (ground 58) into Abdul-Malik (TD reaction 53). Ground game is the clearest separator: Stoltzfus 58 (C) vs Abdul-Malik 41 (D). Stoltzfus brings 2.1 TD/15 and 7 sub wins into Abdul-Malik's 78% takedown defense.
Ground game
StoltzfusStoltzfus 58 (C) vs Abdul-Malik 41 (D). Stoltzfus brings 2.1 TD/15 and 7 sub wins into Abdul-Malik's 78% takedown defense.
Timing & reaction
Abdul-MalikAbdul-Malik 69 (B) vs Stoltzfus 60 (C). The reaction proxy — defense plus absorb plus knockdown timing — sits with Abdul-Malik.
Takedown reaction
StoltzfusStoltzfus 58 (C) vs Abdul-Malik 53 (C). When the shot comes, Stoltzfus stuffs it at 77% — Abdul-Malik is at 78%.
Fight IQ
StoltzfusStoltzfus 61 (C+) vs Abdul-Malik 57 (C). Problem-solving and win-lane diversity sit with Stoltzfus (C+ vs C).
Path · Abdul-Malik
Abdul-Malik has to stuff the first takedown (53 TD-reaction), keep this standing, and hunt a pocket that grades 64 on defense. Wrestling is the death lane.
Path · Stoltzfus
Stoltzfus has to wrestle early, chain the second shot, and make Abdul-Malik defend the neck instead of throwing. That is the percentage path.
A one-score fight on the model. Any three-minute pocket explosion or a stuck takedown against the grain wipes a lot of this number.
Style and location. Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish. Stoltzfus is built as: Hybrid who can change levels. Abdul-Malik is built as: Hybrid who can change levels — suspect hips against the shot. Fight IQ delta is +4 toward Stoltzfus — that is composure, win-lane diversity, and whether they solve a second problem when the first look dies.
The edges that move the number. Ground game: Stoltzfus 58 (C) vs Abdul-Malik 41 (D). Stoltzfus brings 2.1 TD/15 and 7 sub wins into Abdul-Malik's 78% takedown defense. Timing & reaction: Abdul-Malik 69 (B) vs Stoltzfus 60 (C). The reaction proxy — defense plus absorb plus knockdown timing — sits with Abdul-Malik. Takedown reaction: Stoltzfus 58 (C) vs Abdul-Malik 53 (C). When the shot comes, Stoltzfus stuffs it at 77% — Abdul-Malik is at 78%.
The finish path leans the mat (41% submission). Once a takedown sticks, the neck becomes the whole fight. A one-score fight on the model. Any three-minute pocket explosion or a stuck takedown against the grain wipes a lot of this number. These trait marks are derived from FightMetric rates, career method shares, and loaded bout rows — reaction time and agility are proxies, not stopwatch numbers. The model folds the same scores into win probability, so a hole on this card is a hole in the percentage.
Fight IQ, ground game, defense, counter punching, reaction, agility, and takedown reaction — scored from tape and folded into the win number above.
Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish.
R1
33%
R2
19%
R3
20%
Dist
27%
Most likely: Round 1. Expected 8.8 minutes.
Grappler historical edge: Stoltzfus (ground 58) into Abdul-Malik (TD reaction 53).
Ground game (tape)
41 vs 58
Striking efficiency
46% vs 56%
Reach / length
79.5" vs 75.0"
Grappling composite
TD avg × acc × def + control + submission threat (adj.)
Fight IQ
C 57 vs C+ 61 — composure, win-lane diversity, adjustments
Style interaction
Grappler historical edge: Stoltzfus (ground 58) into Abdul-Malik (TD reaction 53).
Timing & reaction
Defense + absorb + knockdown timing proxy
Takedown reaction
78% vs 77% hips on the shot
Recency form
Opp.-adjusted last 0/0 UFC rows
Age-adjusted curve
28 vs 34
Durability
0 vs 0 KO losses
Striking differential
-0.17 vs -0.15 SLpM−SApM (recency / opp. adjusted)
Punching agility
Output × accuracy × age curve
Damage ratio
0.95 vs 0.96 landed/absorbed
Takedown mismatch
TD def 78% vs 77%
Output (SLpM)
3.28 vs 3.30
Counter punching
48 vs 48
Striking defense
61% vs 61%
Strength of schedule
Opp. quality 50 vs 50
Cardio proxy
Output sustainability + distance rate
Layoff / rust
Time since last fight
Championship / 5-round
Three-round fight
Pocket defense (tape)
C+ vs C+
No recent UFC tape in the book.
No recent UFC tape in the book.
Sign in to request a written analyst note on this fight.