UFC Fight Night: Du Plessis vs. Usman · Light Heavyweight · 3 rounds
Opening locked Aug 19, 2026 · Levi Rodrigues Jr. 70% · Decision · Distance · scored miss (Felipe Franco / KO/TKO)

BrazilLevi Rodrigues Jr.
“Baby Monster”
Unranked · 5-1 · striker · Orthodox · 29 · IQ C+ 66
Inside Muay Thai · Brazil
Levi Rodrigues Jr.
69.9%
Felipe Franco
30.1%
Model win probability · confidence 65%
No market posted yet.
Why the model leans this way
Levi Rodrigues Jr. is the model side at 69.9% because the largest live edges sit where this fight is likely to be fought. Grappler historical edge: Franco (ground 50) into Jr. (TD reaction 69). Ground game is the clearest separator: Franco 50 (D) vs Rodrigues Jr. 12 (D). Franco brings 3.0 TD/15 and 4 sub wins into Rodrigues Jr.'s 85% takedown defense.
Ground game
FrancoFranco 50 (D) vs Rodrigues Jr. 12 (D). Franco brings 3.0 TD/15 and 4 sub wins into Rodrigues Jr.'s 85% takedown defense.
Punching agility
Jr.Rodrigues Jr. 68 (C+) vs Franco 50 (C). Hand speed / output lean Rodrigues Jr. (4.5 SLpM at 89%).
Takedown reaction
Jr.Rodrigues Jr. 69 (B) vs Franco 51 (C). When the shot comes, Rodrigues Jr. stuffs it at 85% — Franco is at 73%.
Striking defense
Jr.Rodrigues Jr. 67 (C+) vs Franco 61 (C+). Rodrigues Jr. absorbs 3.02/min at 59% defense; Franco is a softer target at 3.97 SApM.
Path · Jr.
Rodrigues Jr. has to stuff the first takedown (69 TD-reaction), keep this standing, and hunt a pocket that grades 61 on defense. Wrestling is the death lane.
Path · Franco
Franco has to wrestle early, chain the second shot, and make Rodrigues Jr. defend the neck instead of throwing. It is the only reliable flip if the pocket goes cold.
A one-score fight on the model. Any three-minute pocket explosion or a stuck takedown against the grain wipes a lot of this number.
Style and location. Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish. Rodrigues Jr. is built as: Pocket striker. Franco is built as: Hybrid who can change levels — suspect hips against the shot. Fight IQ delta is -3 toward Franco — that is composure, win-lane diversity, and whether they solve a second problem when the first look dies.
The edges that move the number. Ground game: Franco 50 (D) vs Rodrigues Jr. 12 (D). Franco brings 3.0 TD/15 and 4 sub wins into Rodrigues Jr.'s 85% takedown defense. Punching agility: Rodrigues Jr. 68 (C+) vs Franco 50 (C). Hand speed / output lean Rodrigues Jr. (4.5 SLpM at 89%). Takedown reaction: Rodrigues Jr. 69 (B) vs Franco 51 (C). When the shot comes, Rodrigues Jr. stuffs it at 85% — Franco is at 73%.
The clock is live — decision is the modal ending (52%). Minutes and control matter more than a single shot. A one-score fight on the model. Any three-minute pocket explosion or a stuck takedown against the grain wipes a lot of this number. These trait marks are derived from FightMetric rates, career method shares, and loaded bout rows — reaction time and agility are proxies, not stopwatch numbers. The model folds the same scores into win probability, so a hole on this card is a hole in the percentage.
Fight IQ, ground game, defense, counter punching, reaction, agility, and takedown reaction — scored from tape and folded into the win number above.
Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish.
R1
19%
R2
13%
R3
15%
Dist
52%
Most likely: Distance. Expected 11.2 minutes.
Grappler historical edge: Franco (ground 50) into Jr. (TD reaction 69).
Striking differential
1.48 vs -2.16 SLpM−SApM (recency / opp. adjusted)
Ground game (tape)
12 vs 50
Damage ratio
1.49 vs 0.46 landed/absorbed
Striking efficiency
89% vs 65%
Output (SLpM)
4.50 vs 1.81
Takedown reaction
85% vs 73% hips on the shot
Grappling composite
TD avg × acc × def + control + submission threat (adj.)
Punching agility
Output × accuracy × age curve
Striking defense
59% vs 64%
Fight IQ
C+ 66 vs B 69 — composure, win-lane diversity, adjustments
Pocket defense (tape)
C+ vs C+
Style interaction
Grappler historical edge: Franco (ground 50) into Jr. (TD reaction 69).
Counter punching
54 vs 51
Timing & reaction
Defense + absorb + knockdown timing proxy
Cardio proxy
Output sustainability + distance rate
Durability
0 vs 0 KO losses
Takedown mismatch
TD def 85% vs 73%
Age-adjusted curve
29 vs 25
Reach / length
76.5" vs 76.0"
Recency form
Opp.-adjusted last 0/0 UFC rows
Strength of schedule
Opp. quality 50 vs 50
Layoff / rust
Time since last fight
Championship / 5-round
Three-round fight
No recent UFC tape in the book.
No recent UFC tape in the book.
Sign in to request a written analyst note on this fight.