UFC Fight Night: Kape vs. Horiguchi 2 · Featherweight · 3 rounds
Opening locked Aug 19, 2026 · Otari Tanzilovi 91% · Decision · Distance · scored miss (Shane Collins / Decision - Unanimous)
Shane Collins
9.2%
Otari Tanzilovi
90.8%
Model win probability · confidence 86%
No market posted yet.
Why the model leans this way
Otari Tanzilovi is the model side at 90.8% because the largest live edges sit where this fight is likely to be fought. Grappler historical edge: Tanzilovi (ground 49) into Collins (TD reaction 69). Ground game is the clearest separator: Tanzilovi 49 (D) vs Collins 14 (D). Tanzilovi brings 4.0 TD/15 and 0 sub wins into Collins's 85% takedown defense.
Ground game
TanziloviTanzilovi 49 (D) vs Collins 14 (D). Tanzilovi brings 4.0 TD/15 and 0 sub wins into Collins's 85% takedown defense.
Punching agility
TanziloviTanzilovi 68 (B) vs Collins 39 (D). Hand speed / output lean Tanzilovi (4.5 SLpM at 75%).
Counter punching
TanziloviTanzilovi 54 (C) vs Collins 37 (D). Tanzilovi's return is the live one (0.10 KD/15, 0 KOs) against Collins's entries.
Striking defense
TanziloviTanzilovi 67 (C+) vs Collins 57 (C). Tanzilovi absorbs 3.01/min at 59% defense; Collins is a softer target at 4.60 SApM.
Path · Collins
Collins has to stuff the first takedown (69 TD-reaction), keep this standing, and hunt a pocket that grades 67 on defense. Wrestling is the death lane.
Path · Tanzilovi
Tanzilovi has to wrestle early, chain the second shot, and make Collins defend the neck instead of throwing. That is the percentage path.
This is a firm lean, not a lock. The upset script is Collins attacking ground game with durability.
Style and location. Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish. Tanzilovi is built as: Hybrid who can change levels. Collins is built as: Hybrid who can change levels. Fight IQ delta is +6 toward Tanzilovi — that is composure, win-lane diversity, and whether they solve a second problem when the first look dies.
The edges that move the number. Ground game: Tanzilovi 49 (D) vs Collins 14 (D). Tanzilovi brings 4.0 TD/15 and 0 sub wins into Collins's 85% takedown defense. Punching agility: Tanzilovi 68 (B) vs Collins 39 (D). Hand speed / output lean Tanzilovi (4.5 SLpM at 75%). Counter punching: Tanzilovi 54 (C) vs Collins 37 (D). Tanzilovi's return is the live one (0.10 KD/15, 0 KOs) against Collins's entries.
The clock is live — decision is the modal ending (65%). Minutes and control matter more than a single shot. This is a firm lean, not a lock. The upset script is Collins attacking ground game with durability. These trait marks are derived from FightMetric rates, career method shares, and loaded bout rows — reaction time and agility are proxies, not stopwatch numbers. The model folds the same scores into win probability, so a hole on this card is a hole in the percentage.
Fight IQ, ground game, defense, counter punching, reaction, agility, and takedown reaction — scored from tape and folded into the win number above.
Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish.
R1
14%
R2
10%
R3
12%
Dist
65%
Most likely: Distance. Expected 12.2 minutes.
Grappler historical edge: Tanzilovi (ground 49) into Collins (TD reaction 69).
Striking differential
-4.60 vs 1.52 SLpM−SApM (recency / opp. adjusted)
Striking efficiency
0% vs 75%
Damage ratio
0.00 vs 1.50 landed/absorbed
Output (SLpM)
0.00 vs 4.53
Ground game (tape)
14 vs 49
Punching agility
Output × accuracy × age curve
Striking defense
68% vs 59%
Grappling composite
TD avg × acc × def + control + submission threat (adj.)
Counter punching
37 vs 54
Fight IQ
C+ 68 vs B 74 — composure, win-lane diversity, adjustments
Pocket defense (tape)
C vs C+
Takedown reaction
85% vs 69% hips on the shot
Recency form
Opp.-adjusted last 0/0 UFC rows
Style interaction
Grappler historical edge: Tanzilovi (ground 49) into Collins (TD reaction 69).
Cardio proxy
Output sustainability + distance rate
Takedown mismatch
TD def 85% vs 69%
Reach / length
71.0" vs 70.0"
Timing & reaction
Defense + absorb + knockdown timing proxy
Age-adjusted curve
26 vs 28
Strength of schedule
Opp. quality 50 vs 50
Layoff / rust
Time since last fight
Championship / 5-round
Three-round fight
Durability
0 vs 0 KO losses
No recent UFC tape in the book.
No recent UFC tape in the book.
Sign in to request a written analyst note on this fight.