UFC Fight Night: Hooker vs. Parnasse · Heavyweight · 3 rounds
Opening locked Aug 19, 2026 · Mario Pinto 86% · KO/TKO · Distance · waiting on the result
Mario Pinto
86.3%
Ryan Spann
13.7%
Model win probability · confidence 86%
No market posted yet.
Why the model leans this way
Mario Pinto is the model side at 86.3% because the largest live edges sit where this fight is likely to be fought. Submission threat runs into stout takedown defense — the striker can keep this upright. Counter punching is the clearest separator: Pinto 79 (B+) vs Spann 28 (D). Pinto's return is the live one (0.70 KD/15, 6 KOs) against Spann's entries.
Counter punching
PintoPinto 79 (B+) vs Spann 28 (D). Pinto's return is the live one (0.70 KD/15, 6 KOs) against Spann's entries.
Punching agility
PintoPinto 65 (C+) vs Spann 27 (D). Hand speed / output lean Pinto (2.9 SLpM at 82%).
Striking defense
PintoPinto 63 (C+) vs Spann 28 (D). Pinto absorbs 3.60/min at 62% defense; Spann is a softer target at 6.60 SApM.
Timing & reaction
PintoPinto 68 (C+) vs Spann 38 (D). The reaction proxy — defense plus absorb plus knockdown timing — sits with Pinto.
Path · Pinto
Pinto should keep this standing, feint the level change, and make Spann reach. The counter is built for a high-SApM pocket.
Path · Spann
Spann wins by forcing the fight into takedown reaction and denying Pinto a long look at fight iq.
This is a firm lean, not a lock. The upset script is Spann attacking ground game with takedown reaction.
Style and location. Wrestling attempts get stuffed; the fight leaks back to the feet. Pinto is built as: Hybrid who can change levels — high-IQ problem solver, live counter. Spann is built as: Submission hunter — porous pocket. Fight IQ delta is +29 toward Pinto — that is composure, win-lane diversity, and whether they solve a second problem when the first look dies.
The edges that move the number. Counter punching: Pinto 79 (B+) vs Spann 28 (D). Pinto's return is the live one (0.70 KD/15, 6 KOs) against Spann's entries. Punching agility: Pinto 65 (C+) vs Spann 27 (D). Hand speed / output lean Pinto (2.9 SLpM at 82%). Striking defense: Pinto 63 (C+) vs Spann 28 (D). Pinto absorbs 3.60/min at 62% defense; Spann is a softer target at 6.60 SApM.
The finish path leans strikes (50% KO/TKO vs 14% submission). One clean read in the pocket can flip a close card. This is a firm lean, not a lock. The upset script is Spann attacking ground game with takedown reaction. These trait marks are derived from FightMetric rates, career method shares, and loaded bout rows — reaction time and agility are proxies, not stopwatch numbers. The model folds the same scores into win probability, so a hole on this card is a hole in the percentage.
Fight IQ, ground game, defense, counter punching, reaction, agility, and takedown reaction — scored from tape and folded into the win number above.
Wrestling attempts get stuffed; the fight leaks back to the feet.
R1
33%
R2
17%
R3
15%
Dist
36%
Most likely: Distance. Expected 9.2 minutes.
Submission threat runs into stout takedown defense — the striker can keep this upright.
Striking differential
-0.50 vs -3.47 SLpM−SApM (recency / opp. adjusted)
Fight IQ
B+ 83 vs C 54 — composure, win-lane diversity, adjustments
Counter punching
79 vs 28
Striking efficiency
72% vs 38%
Striking defense
64% vs 41%
Pocket defense (tape)
C+ vs D
Punching agility
Output × accuracy × age curve
Recency form
Opp.-adjusted last 6/6 UFC rows
Timing & reaction
Defense + absorb + knockdown timing proxy
Damage ratio
0.85 vs 0.46 landed/absorbed
Durability
0 vs 0 KO losses
Cardio proxy
Output sustainability + distance rate
Takedown reaction
76% vs 100% hips on the shot
Ground game (tape)
50 vs 57
Grappling composite
TD avg × acc × def + control + submission threat (adj.)
Age-adjusted curve
28 vs 34
Takedown mismatch
TD def 78% vs 90%
Strength of schedule
Opp. quality 58 vs 53
Output (SLpM)
2.86 vs 2.93
Reach / length
79.0" vs 79.0"
Style interaction
Submission threat runs into stout takedown defense — the striker can keep this upright.
Layoff / rust
Time since last fight
Championship / 5-round
Three-round fight
Fighter 5292014
Decision - Unanimous · R3 5:00
Fighter 5145497
KO/TKO · R2 4:10
Fighter 2223033
KO/TKO · R2 0:39
Fighter 5218818
KO/TKO · R1 1:43
Fighter 4898181
Decision - Unanimous · R5 5:00
Fighter 5074149
KO/TKO · R3 1:18
Fighter 4711604
KO/TKO · R2 2:10
Fighter 4710386
Submission · R1 2:47
Waldo Cortes Acosta
KO/TKO · R2 4:48
Fighter 2500735
Submission · R1 1:35
Fighter 5152109
KO/TKO · R2 3:16
Fighter 2512976
Decision - Split · R3 5:00
Sign in to request a written analyst note on this fight.