UFC Fight Night: Ankalaev vs. Guskov · Light Heavyweight · 3 rounds
Opening locked Aug 19, 2026 · Brendson Ribeiro 77% · Decision · Distance · scored miss (Magomed Tuchalov / Decision - Unanimous)

RussiaMagomed Tuchalov
“Tiger”
Unranked · 7-0 · hybrid · Orthodox · 26 · IQ C+ 68
Dagestan Fighter · Russia
Magomed Tuchalov
22.9%
Brendson Ribeiro
77.1%
Model win probability · confidence 73%
No market posted yet.
Why the model leans this way
Brendson Ribeiro is the model side at 77.1% because the largest live edges sit where this fight is likely to be fought. Grappler historical edge: Ribeiro (ground 41) into Tuchalov (TD reaction 69). Ground game is the clearest separator: Ribeiro 41 (D) vs Tuchalov 15 (D). Ribeiro brings 0.8 TD/15 and 7 sub wins into Tuchalov's 85% takedown defense.
Ground game
RibeiroRibeiro 41 (D) vs Tuchalov 15 (D). Ribeiro brings 0.8 TD/15 and 7 sub wins into Tuchalov's 85% takedown defense.
Fight IQ
TuchalovTuchalov 68 (C+) vs Ribeiro 53 (C). Problem-solving and win-lane diversity sit with Tuchalov (C+ vs C).
Takedown reaction
TuchalovTuchalov 69 (B) vs Ribeiro 59 (C). When the shot comes, Tuchalov stuffs it at 85% — Ribeiro is at 82%.
Striking defense
RibeiroRibeiro 63 (C+) vs Tuchalov 57 (C). Ribeiro absorbs 3.54/min at 62% defense; Tuchalov is a softer target at 4.60 SApM.
Path · Tuchalov
Tuchalov has to stuff the first takedown (69 TD-reaction), keep this standing, and hunt a pocket that grades 63 on defense. Wrestling is the death lane.
Path · Ribeiro
Ribeiro has to wrestle early, chain the second shot, and make Tuchalov defend the neck instead of throwing. That is the percentage path.
This is a firm lean, not a lock. The upset script is Tuchalov attacking counter punching with durability.
Style and location. Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish. Ribeiro is built as: Hybrid who can change levels. Tuchalov is built as: Hybrid who can change levels. Fight IQ delta is -14 toward Tuchalov — that is composure, win-lane diversity, and whether they solve a second problem when the first look dies.
The edges that move the number. Ground game: Ribeiro 41 (D) vs Tuchalov 15 (D). Ribeiro brings 0.8 TD/15 and 7 sub wins into Tuchalov's 85% takedown defense. Fight IQ: Tuchalov 68 (C+) vs Ribeiro 53 (C). Problem-solving and win-lane diversity sit with Tuchalov (C+ vs C). Takedown reaction: Tuchalov 69 (B) vs Ribeiro 59 (C). When the shot comes, Tuchalov stuffs it at 85% — Ribeiro is at 82%.
The finish path leans strikes (31% KO/TKO vs 31% submission). One clean read in the pocket can flip a close card. This is a firm lean, not a lock. The upset script is Tuchalov attacking counter punching with durability. These trait marks are derived from FightMetric rates, career method shares, and loaded bout rows — reaction time and agility are proxies, not stopwatch numbers. The model folds the same scores into win probability, so a hole on this card is a hole in the percentage.
Fight IQ, ground game, defense, counter punching, reaction, agility, and takedown reaction — scored from tape and folded into the win number above.
Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish.
R1
24%
R2
17%
R3
20%
Dist
39%
Most likely: Distance. Expected 10.1 minutes.
Grappler historical edge: Ribeiro (ground 41) into Tuchalov (TD reaction 69).
Striking differential
-4.60 vs -0.50 SLpM−SApM (recency / opp. adjusted)
Striking efficiency
0% vs 45%
Damage ratio
0.00 vs 0.86 landed/absorbed
Ground game (tape)
15 vs 41
Output (SLpM)
0.00 vs 3.04
Fight IQ
C+ 68 vs C 53 — composure, win-lane diversity, adjustments
Recency form
Opp.-adjusted last 0/0 UFC rows
Striking defense
68% vs 62%
Grappling composite
TD avg × acc × def + control + submission threat (adj.)
Takedown reaction
85% vs 82% hips on the shot
Reach / length
78.0" vs 81.0"
Pocket defense (tape)
C vs C+
Style interaction
Grappler historical edge: Ribeiro (ground 41) into Tuchalov (TD reaction 69).
Durability
0 vs 0 KO losses
Timing & reaction
Defense + absorb + knockdown timing proxy
Cardio proxy
Output sustainability + distance rate
Punching agility
Output × accuracy × age curve
Age-adjusted curve
26 vs 29
Counter punching
37 vs 36
Takedown mismatch
TD def 85% vs 82%
Strength of schedule
Opp. quality 50 vs 50
Layoff / rust
Time since last fight
Championship / 5-round
Three-round fight
No recent UFC tape in the book.
No recent UFC tape in the book.
Sign in to request a written analyst note on this fight.