UFC 329: McGregor vs. Holloway 2 · Women's Flyweight · 3 rounds
Opening locked Aug 19, 2026 · Wang Cong 78% · Decision · Distance · scored hit (Wang Cong / Decision - Unanimous)
Tracy Cortez
22.1%
Wang Cong
77.9%
Model win probability · confidence 74%
No market posted yet.
Why the model leans this way
Wang Cong is the model side at 77.9% because the largest live edges sit where this fight is likely to be fought. Striker vs striker. The pocket and the counter become the whole fight. Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly. Punching agility is the clearest separator: Cong 79 (B+) vs Cortez 54 (C). Hand speed / output lean Cong (6.8 SLpM at 64%).
Punching agility
CongCong 79 (B+) vs Cortez 54 (C). Hand speed / output lean Cong (6.8 SLpM at 64%).
Striking defense
CongCong 73 (B) vs Cortez 65 (C+). Cong absorbs 2.21/min at 54% defense; Cortez is a softer target at 3.22 SApM.
Fight IQ
CongCong 62 (C+) vs Cortez 56 (C). Problem-solving and win-lane diversity sit with Cong (C+ vs C).
Counter punching
CortezCortez 46 (D) vs Cong 41 (D). Cortez's return is the live one (0.10 KD/15, 0 KOs) against Cong's entries.
Path · Cortez
Cortez wins by forcing the fight into durability and denying Cong a long look at durability.
Path · Cong
Volume. Cong wins ugly minutes at range, clutter the center, and never give Cortez a clean reset.
This is a firm lean, not a lock. The upset script is Cortez attacking counter punching with durability.
Style and location. Almost exclusively standing. Power and volume decide it. Cong is built as: Volume pressure striker — suspect hips against the shot, southpaw. Cortez is built as: Pocket striker — suspect hips against the shot. Fight IQ delta is +6 toward Cong — that is composure, win-lane diversity, and whether they solve a second problem when the first look dies.
The edges that move the number. Punching agility: Cong 79 (B+) vs Cortez 54 (C). Hand speed / output lean Cong (6.8 SLpM at 64%). Striking defense: Cong 73 (B) vs Cortez 65 (C+). Cong absorbs 2.21/min at 54% defense; Cortez is a softer target at 3.22 SApM. Fight IQ: Cong 62 (C+) vs Cortez 56 (C). Problem-solving and win-lane diversity sit with Cong (C+ vs C).
The finish path leans strikes (29% KO/TKO vs 24% submission). One clean read in the pocket can flip a close card. This is a firm lean, not a lock. The upset script is Cortez attacking counter punching with durability. These trait marks are derived from FightMetric rates, career method shares, and loaded bout rows — reaction time and agility are proxies, not stopwatch numbers. The model folds the same scores into win probability, so a hole on this card is a hole in the percentage.
Fight IQ, ground game, defense, counter punching, reaction, agility, and takedown reaction — scored from tape and folded into the win number above.
Almost exclusively standing. Power and volume decide it.
R1
22%
R2
15%
R3
17%
Dist
47%
Most likely: Distance. Expected 10.7 minutes.
Striker vs striker. The pocket and the counter become the whole fight. Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly.
Striking differential
0.73 vs 4.61 SLpM−SApM (recency / opp. adjusted)
Damage ratio
1.23 vs 3.09 landed/absorbed
Output (SLpM)
3.95 vs 6.82
Punching agility
Output × accuracy × age curve
Fight IQ
C 56 vs C+ 62 — composure, win-lane diversity, adjustments
Striking defense
60% vs 54%
Striking efficiency
56% vs 64%
Pocket defense (tape)
C+ vs B
Recency form
Opp.-adjusted last 0/0 UFC rows
Counter punching
46 vs 41
Cardio proxy
Output sustainability + distance rate
Takedown reaction
77% vs 83% hips on the shot
Grappling composite
TD avg × acc × def + control + submission threat (adj.)
Age-adjusted curve
32 vs 34
Takedown mismatch
TD def 77% vs 83%
Style interaction
Striker vs striker. The pocket and the counter become the whole fight. Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly.
Timing & reaction
Defense + absorb + knockdown timing proxy
Ground game (tape)
42 vs 42
Reach / length
65.5" vs 65.5"
Strength of schedule
Opp. quality 50 vs 50
Layoff / rust
Time since last fight
Championship / 5-round
Three-round fight
Durability
0 vs 0 KO losses
No recent UFC tape in the book.
No recent UFC tape in the book.
Sign in to request a written analyst note on this fight.