UFC Fight Night: Kape vs. Horiguchi 2 · Light Heavyweight · 3 rounds
Opening locked Aug 19, 2026 · Navajo Stirling 72% · KO/TKO · Round 1 · scored hit (Navajo Stirling / KO/TKO)

MoldovaIon Cutelaba
“The Hulk”
Unranked · 20-12-1 · hybrid · Southpaw · 32 · IQ C 58
Xtreme Couture · Moldova
Ion Cutelaba
28.4%
Navajo Stirling
71.6%
Model win probability · confidence 67%
No market posted yet.
Why the model leans this way
Navajo Stirling is the model side at 71.6% because the largest live edges sit where this fight is likely to be fought. Grappler historical edge: Cutelaba (ground 59) into Stirling (TD reaction 68). Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly. Ground game is the clearest separator: Cutelaba 59 (C) vs Stirling 22 (D). Cutelaba brings 3.8 TD/15 and 4 sub wins into Stirling's 82% takedown defense.
Ground game
CutelabaCutelaba 59 (C) vs Stirling 22 (D). Cutelaba brings 3.8 TD/15 and 4 sub wins into Stirling's 82% takedown defense.
Punching agility
StirlingStirling 85 (A) vs Cutelaba 55 (C). Hand speed / output lean Stirling (6.5 SLpM at 58%).
Takedown reaction
StirlingStirling 68 (C+) vs Cutelaba 54 (C). When the shot comes, Stirling stuffs it at 82% — Cutelaba is at 70%.
Timing & reaction
StirlingStirling 73 (B) vs Cutelaba 61 (C+). The reaction proxy — defense plus absorb plus knockdown timing — sits with Stirling.
Path · Cutelaba
Cutelaba has to wrestle early, chain the second shot, and make Stirling defend the neck instead of throwing. It is the only reliable flip if the pocket goes cold.
Path · Stirling
Stirling has to stuff the first takedown (68 TD-reaction), keep this standing, and hunt a pocket that grades 66 on defense. Wrestling is the death lane.
A one-score fight on the model. Any three-minute pocket explosion or a stuck takedown against the grain wipes a lot of this number.
Style and location. Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish. Stirling is built as: Volume pressure striker. Cutelaba is built as: Hybrid who can change levels — suspect hips against the shot, southpaw. Fight IQ delta is +8 toward Stirling — that is composure, win-lane diversity, and whether they solve a second problem when the first look dies.
The edges that move the number. Ground game: Cutelaba 59 (C) vs Stirling 22 (D). Cutelaba brings 3.8 TD/15 and 4 sub wins into Stirling's 82% takedown defense. Punching agility: Stirling 85 (A) vs Cutelaba 55 (C). Hand speed / output lean Stirling (6.5 SLpM at 58%). Takedown reaction: Stirling 68 (C+) vs Cutelaba 54 (C). When the shot comes, Stirling stuffs it at 82% — Cutelaba is at 70%.
The finish path leans strikes (54% KO/TKO vs 18% submission). One clean read in the pocket can flip a close card. A one-score fight on the model. Any three-minute pocket explosion or a stuck takedown against the grain wipes a lot of this number. These trait marks are derived from FightMetric rates, career method shares, and loaded bout rows — reaction time and agility are proxies, not stopwatch numbers. The model folds the same scores into win probability, so a hole on this card is a hole in the percentage.
Fight IQ, ground game, defense, counter punching, reaction, agility, and takedown reaction — scored from tape and folded into the win number above.
Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish.
R1
35%
R2
19%
R3
18%
Dist
29%
Most likely: Round 1. Expected 8.7 minutes.
Grappler historical edge: Cutelaba (ground 59) into Stirling (TD reaction 68). Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly.
Striking differential
1.11 vs 4.13 SLpM−SApM (recency / opp. adjusted)
Damage ratio
1.36 vs 2.76 landed/absorbed
Ground game (tape)
59 vs 22
Output (SLpM)
4.23 vs 6.47
Punching agility
Output × accuracy × age curve
Grappling composite
TD avg × acc × def + control + submission threat (adj.)
Takedown reaction
70% vs 82% hips on the shot
Fight IQ
C 58 vs C+ 66 — composure, win-lane diversity, adjustments
Recency form
Opp.-adjusted last 0/0 UFC rows
Reach / length
75.0" vs 79.0"
Striking defense
60% vs 55%
Timing & reaction
Defense + absorb + knockdown timing proxy
Striking efficiency
52% vs 58%
Pocket defense (tape)
C+ vs B
Style interaction
Grappler historical edge: Cutelaba (ground 59) into Stirling (TD reaction 68). Open-stance look favors the southpaw / switch side slightly.
Counter punching
46 vs 50
Cardio proxy
Output sustainability + distance rate
Takedown mismatch
TD def 70% vs 82%
Age-adjusted curve
32 vs 28
Strength of schedule
Opp. quality 50 vs 50
Layoff / rust
Time since last fight
Championship / 5-round
Three-round fight
Durability
0 vs 0 KO losses
No recent UFC tape in the book.
No recent UFC tape in the book.
Sign in to request a written analyst note on this fight.