UFC Fight Night: Muhammad vs. Bonfim · Women's Strawweight · 3 rounds
Opening locked Aug 19, 2026 · Ketlen Souza 61% · Decision · Distance · scored hit (Ketlen Souza / KO/TKO)

BrazilKetlen Souza
“Esquentadinha”
Unranked · 17-6 · striker · Orthodox · 32 · IQ C 57
Ribas Family · Brazil
Ketlen Souza
61.4%
Ariane Carnelossi
38.6%
Model win probability · confidence 55%
No market posted yet.
Why the model leans this way
Ketlen Souza is the model side at 61.4% because the largest live edges sit where this fight is likely to be fought. Grappler historical edge: Carnelossi (ground 35) into Souza (TD reaction 58). Punching agility is the clearest separator: Souza 58 (C) vs Carnelossi 43 (D). Hand speed / output lean Souza (4.0 SLpM at 61%).
Punching agility
SouzaSouza 58 (C) vs Carnelossi 43 (D). Hand speed / output lean Souza (4.0 SLpM at 61%).
Ground game
CarnelossiCarnelossi 35 (D) vs Souza 21 (D). Carnelossi brings 1.1 TD/15 and 2 sub wins into Souza's 83% takedown defense.
Counter punching
SouzaSouza 50 (C) vs Carnelossi 42 (D). Souza's return is the live one (0.12 KD/15, 0 KOs) against Carnelossi's entries.
Striking defense
SouzaSouza 65 (C+) vs Carnelossi 62 (C+). Souza absorbs 3.20/min at 60% defense; Carnelossi is a softer target at 3.66 SApM.
Path · Souza
Souza has to stuff the first takedown (58 TD-reaction), keep this standing, and hunt a pocket that grades 62 on defense. Wrestling is the death lane.
Path · Carnelossi
Carnelossi has to wrestle early, chain the second shot, and make Souza defend the neck instead of throwing. It is the only reliable flip if the pocket goes cold.
A one-score fight on the model. Any three-minute pocket explosion or a stuck takedown against the grain wipes a lot of this number.
Style and location. Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish. Souza is built as: Pocket striker. Carnelossi is built as: Hybrid who can change levels. Fight IQ delta is +1 toward Souza — that is composure, win-lane diversity, and whether they solve a second problem when the first look dies.
The edges that move the number. Punching agility: Souza 58 (C) vs Carnelossi 43 (D). Hand speed / output lean Souza (4.0 SLpM at 61%). Ground game: Carnelossi 35 (D) vs Souza 21 (D). Carnelossi brings 1.1 TD/15 and 2 sub wins into Souza's 83% takedown defense. Counter punching: Souza 50 (C) vs Carnelossi 42 (D). Souza's return is the live one (0.12 KD/15, 0 KOs) against Carnelossi's entries.
The clock is live — decision is the modal ending (54%). Minutes and control matter more than a single shot. A one-score fight on the model. Any three-minute pocket explosion or a stuck takedown against the grain wipes a lot of this number. These trait marks are derived from FightMetric rates, career method shares, and loaded bout rows — reaction time and agility are proxies, not stopwatch numbers. The model folds the same scores into win probability, so a hole on this card is a hole in the percentage.
Fight IQ, ground game, defense, counter punching, reaction, agility, and takedown reaction — scored from tape and folded into the win number above.
Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish.
R1
18%
R2
13%
R3
15%
Dist
54%
Most likely: Distance. Expected 11.3 minutes.
Grappler historical edge: Carnelossi (ground 35) into Souza (TD reaction 58).
Striking differential
0.81 vs -0.98 SLpM−SApM (recency / opp. adjusted)
Damage ratio
1.25 vs 0.73 landed/absorbed
Ground game (tape)
21 vs 35
Output (SLpM)
4.01 vs 2.68
Striking efficiency
61% vs 52%
Punching agility
Output × accuracy × age curve
Counter punching
50 vs 42
Style interaction
Grappler historical edge: Carnelossi (ground 35) into Souza (TD reaction 58).
Striking defense
60% vs 63%
Grappling composite
TD avg × acc × def + control + submission threat (adj.)
Reach / length
63.0" vs 61.5"
Takedown reaction
83% vs 81% hips on the shot
Pocket defense (tape)
C+ vs C+
Fight IQ
C 57 vs C 56 — composure, win-lane diversity, adjustments
Cardio proxy
Output sustainability + distance rate
Timing & reaction
Defense + absorb + knockdown timing proxy
Takedown mismatch
TD def 83% vs 81%
Recency form
Opp.-adjusted last 0/0 UFC rows
Age-adjusted curve
32 vs 33
Strength of schedule
Opp. quality 50 vs 50
Layoff / rust
Time since last fight
Championship / 5-round
Three-round fight
Durability
0 vs 0 KO losses
No recent UFC tape in the book.
No recent UFC tape in the book.
Sign in to request a written analyst note on this fight.