UFC Fight Night: Fiziev vs. Torres · Lightweight · 5 rounds
Opening locked Aug 19, 2026 · Manuel Torres 79% · KO/TKO · Round 1 · scored miss (Rafael Fiziev / KO/TKO)

AzerbaijanRafael Fiziev
“Ataman”
Unranked · 14-5 · striker · Switch · 33 · IQ C 60
Tiger Muay Thai · Azerbaijan
Rafael Fiziev
21.2%
Manuel Torres
78.8%
Model win probability · confidence 75%
No market posted yet.
Why the model leans this way
Manuel Torres is the model side at 78.8% because the largest live edges sit where this fight is likely to be fought. Grappler historical edge: Torres (ground 58) into Fiziev (TD reaction 67). Ground game is the clearest separator: Torres 58 (C) vs Fiziev 34 (D). Torres brings 1.7 TD/15 and 7 sub wins into Fiziev's 81% takedown defense.
Ground game
TorresTorres 58 (C) vs Fiziev 34 (D). Torres brings 1.7 TD/15 and 7 sub wins into Fiziev's 81% takedown defense.
Punching agility
TorresTorres 85 (A) vs Fiziev 64 (C+). Hand speed / output lean Torres (7.3 SLpM at 60%).
Takedown reaction
FizievFiziev 67 (C+) vs Torres 53 (C). When the shot comes, Fiziev stuffs it at 81% — Torres is at 78%.
Counter punching
FizievFiziev 50 (C) vs Torres 42 (D). Fiziev's return is the live one (0.59 KD/15, 0 KOs) against Torres's entries.
Path · Fiziev
Fiziev has to stuff the first takedown (67 TD-reaction), keep this standing, and hunt a pocket that grades 73 on defense. Wrestling is the death lane.
Path · Torres
Torres has to wrestle early, chain the second shot, and make Fiziev defend the neck instead of throwing. That is the percentage path.
This is a firm lean, not a lock. The upset script is Fiziev attacking counter punching with durability.
Style and location. Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish. Torres is built as: Volume pressure striker — suspect hips against the shot. Fiziev is built as: Pocket striker. Fight IQ delta is +4 toward Torres — that is composure, win-lane diversity, and whether they solve a second problem when the first look dies.
The edges that move the number. Ground game: Torres 58 (C) vs Fiziev 34 (D). Torres brings 1.7 TD/15 and 7 sub wins into Fiziev's 81% takedown defense. Punching agility: Torres 85 (A) vs Fiziev 64 (C+). Hand speed / output lean Torres (7.3 SLpM at 60%). Takedown reaction: Fiziev 67 (C+) vs Torres 53 (C). When the shot comes, Fiziev stuffs it at 81% — Torres is at 78%.
The finish path leans strikes (40% KO/TKO vs 36% submission). One clean read in the pocket can flip a close card. This is a firm lean, not a lock. The upset script is Fiziev attacking counter punching with durability. These trait marks are derived from FightMetric rates, career method shares, and loaded bout rows — reaction time and agility are proxies, not stopwatch numbers. The model folds the same scores into win probability, so a hole on this card is a hole in the percentage.
Fight IQ, ground game, defense, counter punching, reaction, agility, and takedown reaction — scored from tape and folded into the win number above.
Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish.
R1
37%
R2
20%
R3
15%
R4
2%
R5
2%
Dist
24%
Most likely: Round 1. Expected 11 minutes.
Grappler historical edge: Torres (ground 58) into Fiziev (TD reaction 67).
Striking differential
1.76 vs 5.24 SLpM−SApM (recency / opp. adjusted)
Damage ratio
1.60 vs 3.56 landed/absorbed
Ground game (tape)
34 vs 58
Output (SLpM)
4.71 vs 7.29
Takedown reaction
81% vs 78% hips on the shot
Punching agility
Output × accuracy × age curve
Grappling composite
TD avg × acc × def + control + submission threat (adj.)
Striking defense
59% vs 53%
Fight IQ
C 60 vs C+ 64 — composure, win-lane diversity, adjustments
Counter punching
50 vs 42
Striking efficiency
55% vs 60%
Pocket defense (tape)
C+ vs B
Reach / length
71.5" vs 73.5"
Style interaction
Grappler historical edge: Torres (ground 58) into Fiziev (TD reaction 67).
Durability
0 vs 0 KO losses
Recency form
Opp.-adjusted last 0/0 UFC rows
Cardio proxy
Output sustainability + distance rate
Age-adjusted curve
33 vs 31
Timing & reaction
Defense + absorb + knockdown timing proxy
Takedown mismatch
TD def 81% vs 78%
Strength of schedule
Opp. quality 50 vs 50
Layoff / rust
Time since last fight
Championship / 5-round
Five-round experience matters
No recent UFC tape in the book.
No recent UFC tape in the book.
Sign in to request a written analyst note on this fight.