UFC Fight Night: Muhammad vs. Bonfim · Middleweight · 3 rounds
Opening locked Aug 19, 2026 · Brendan Allen 72% · Submission · Round 1 · scored hit (Brendan Allen / Decision - Unanimous)

BrazilBrendan Allen
“All In”
Unranked · 27-7 · striker · Orthodox · 30 · IQ B 68
Kill Cliff FC · Brazil
Brendan Allen
71.6%
Edmen Shahbazyan
28.4%
Model win probability · confidence 76%
No market posted yet.
Why the model leans this way
Brendan Allen is the model side at 71.6% because the largest live edges sit where this fight is likely to be fought. Grappler historical edge: Allen (ground 57) into Shahbazyan (TD reaction 38). Timing & reaction is the clearest separator: Allen 63 (C+) vs Shahbazyan 32 (D). The reaction proxy — defense plus absorb plus knockdown timing — sits with Allen.
Timing & reaction
AllenAllen 63 (C+) vs Shahbazyan 32 (D). The reaction proxy — defense plus absorb plus knockdown timing — sits with Allen.
Striking defense
AllenAllen 64 (C+) vs Shahbazyan 39 (D). Allen absorbs 3.34/min at 61% defense; Shahbazyan is a softer target at 4.20 SApM.
Takedown reaction
AllenAllen 62 (C+) vs Shahbazyan 38 (D). When the shot comes, Allen stuffs it at 79% — Shahbazyan is at 60%.
Ground game
AllenAllen 57 (C) vs Shahbazyan 38 (D). Allen brings 1.6 TD/15 and 14 sub wins into Shahbazyan's 60% takedown defense.
Path · Allen
Allen has to wrestle early, chain the second shot, and make Shahbazyan defend the neck instead of throwing. That is the percentage path.
Path · Shahbazyan
Shahbazyan has to stuff the first takedown (38 TD-reaction), keep this standing, and hunt a pocket that grades 64 on defense. Wrestling is the death lane.
A one-score fight on the model. Any three-minute pocket explosion or a stuck takedown against the grain wipes a lot of this number.
Style and location. Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish. Allen is built as: Pocket striker. Shahbazyan is built as: Power striker — suspect hips against the shot, porous pocket. Fight IQ delta is +11 toward Allen — that is composure, win-lane diversity, and whether they solve a second problem when the first look dies.
The edges that move the number. Timing & reaction: Allen 63 (C+) vs Shahbazyan 32 (D). The reaction proxy — defense plus absorb plus knockdown timing — sits with Allen. Striking defense: Allen 64 (C+) vs Shahbazyan 39 (D). Allen absorbs 3.34/min at 61% defense; Shahbazyan is a softer target at 4.20 SApM. Takedown reaction: Allen 62 (C+) vs Shahbazyan 38 (D). When the shot comes, Allen stuffs it at 79% — Shahbazyan is at 60%.
The finish path leans the mat (39% submission). Once a takedown sticks, the neck becomes the whole fight. A one-score fight on the model. Any three-minute pocket explosion or a stuck takedown against the grain wipes a lot of this number. These trait marks are derived from FightMetric rates, career method shares, and loaded bout rows — reaction time and agility are proxies, not stopwatch numbers. The model folds the same scores into win probability, so a hole on this card is a hole in the percentage.
Fight IQ, ground game, defense, counter punching, reaction, agility, and takedown reaction — scored from tape and folded into the win number above.
Wrestling entries, fence control, and mat time should decide the scorecards — or the finish.
R1
33%
R2
19%
R3
20%
Dist
28%
Most likely: Round 1. Expected 8.9 minutes.
Grappler historical edge: Allen (ground 57) into Shahbazyan (TD reaction 38).
Striking defense
61% vs 38%
Takedown reaction
79% vs 60% hips on the shot
Ground game (tape)
57 vs 38
Pocket defense (tape)
C+ vs D
Timing & reaction
Defense + absorb + knockdown timing proxy
Fight IQ
B 68 vs C 57 — composure, win-lane diversity, adjustments
Striking efficiency
60% vs 48%
Grappling composite
TD avg × acc × def + control + submission threat (adj.)
Output (SLpM)
3.59 vs 4.66
Style interaction
Grappler historical edge: Allen (ground 57) into Shahbazyan (TD reaction 38).
Punching agility
Output × accuracy × age curve
Striking differential
0.25 vs 0.49 SLpM−SApM (recency / opp. adjusted)
Recency form
Opp.-adjusted last 0/7 UFC rows
Durability
0 vs 0 KO losses
Takedown mismatch
TD def 79% vs 60%
Counter punching
51 vs 48
Damage ratio
1.07 vs 1.12 landed/absorbed
Strength of schedule
Opp. quality 50 vs 55
Age-adjusted curve
30 vs 28
Cardio proxy
Output sustainability + distance rate
Reach / length
75.0" vs 75.0"
Layoff / rust
Time since last fight
Championship / 5-round
Three-round fight
No recent UFC tape in the book.
Fighter 4025699
Decision - Unanimous · R3 5:00
Fighter 3091099
KO/TKO · R1 4:58
Fighter 4697476
Decision - Unanimous · R3 5:00
Fighter 5032015
KO/TKO · R1 1:35
Fighter 2553261
Submission · R2 4:12
Fighter 4374436
KO/TKO · R1 4:33
Anthony Hernandez
KO/TKO · R3 1:01
Sign in to request a written analyst note on this fight.